User:Manetta/i-could-have-written-that/syntactic-view: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
(Created page with "[http://pzwart1.wdka.hro.nl/~manetta/i-could-have-written-that/elements/computer-control-languages/computer-control-languages.html (annotations FC)] [http://pzwart1.wdka.hro.n...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://pzwart1.wdka.hro.nl/~manetta/i-could-have-written-that/elements/computer-control-languages/computer-control-languages.html (annotations FC)] [http://pzwart1.wdka.hro.nl/~manetta/i-could-have-written-that/elements/outing-A.I._beyond-the-Turing-test/outing-A.I._beyond-the-Turing-test.html (annotations BB)]
<div style="width:50%;">
__NOTOC__
=syntactical view=
 
==calls==
* ''Critical thinking about computers is not possible without an informed understanding.'' (...) ''Software as a whole is not only 'code' but a symbolic form involving cultural practices of its employment and appropriation.'' (...) ''It's upon critics to reflect on the contraints that computer control languages write into culture.'' <ref name="fc">Language, by Florian Cramer; published in Software Studies, edited by Matthew Fuller (2008)</ref>
 
* ''in many cases these debates [about artificial intelligence] may be missing the real point of what it means to live and think with forms of '''synthetic intelligence''' very different from our own.'' (...) ''To regard A.I. as inhuman and machinic should enable a more reality-based understanding of ourselves, our situation, and a fuller and more complex understanding of what 'intelligence' is and is not.'' <ref name="bb">Benjamin Bratton, Outing A.I. Beyond the Turing Test (2015)</ref>
 
 
(...)
 
 
==notes==
(...)
 
==references==
<references />
 
==related==
[http://pzwart1.wdka.hro.nl/~manetta/i-could-have-written-that/elements/computer-control-languages/computer-control-languages.html (annotations FC)] <br>
[http://pzwart1.wdka.hro.nl/~manetta/i-could-have-written-that/elements/outing-A.I._beyond-the-Turing-test/outing-A.I._beyond-the-Turing-test.html (annotations BB)]<br>
 
--------------------------------------------
<gallery mode="nolines" height="50px">
</gallery>
</div>

Latest revision as of 23:08, 10 November 2015

syntactical view

calls

  • Critical thinking about computers is not possible without an informed understanding. (...) Software as a whole is not only 'code' but a symbolic form involving cultural practices of its employment and appropriation. (...) It's upon critics to reflect on the contraints that computer control languages write into culture. [1]
  • in many cases these debates [about artificial intelligence] may be missing the real point of what it means to live and think with forms of synthetic intelligence very different from our own. (...) To regard A.I. as inhuman and machinic should enable a more reality-based understanding of ourselves, our situation, and a fuller and more complex understanding of what 'intelligence' is and is not. [2]


(...)


notes

(...)

references

  1. Language, by Florian Cramer; published in Software Studies, edited by Matthew Fuller (2008)
  2. Benjamin Bratton, Outing A.I. Beyond the Turing Test (2015)

related

(annotations FC)
(annotations BB)