User:Themsen/TT3-1: Difference between revisions
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=Video recordings= | =Video recordings= | ||
[https://www.youtube.com/embed/vGa4uBFaD_Y|conwaytry1 with mouse-writing] | [https://www.youtube.com/embed/vGa4uBFaD_Y| conwaytry1 with mouse-writing] | ||
[https://youtu.be/AKmhDSiY3K4 | conway2 with written transcript while mouse-writing] | |||
[https://youtu.be/AKmhDSiY3K4] | |||
=Text transcript= | =Text transcript= |
Revision as of 15:27, 19 April 2015
Description
What: Using conway's game of Life to write about my views on M. Heidegger's "The Thing". Conway's Game of life proposedly simulates cellular life, 'chaos', according to 4 simple rules. It is one of the pioneering applications of evolutionary algorithms. How: As I write the simulation is static, and when I press play what I've written interacts with the rest of the environment, like Archimedes writing in the sand. The first try we more similar to the latter where I let my thoughts fly while playing with the game. Why: I found the media object to be a so-called anti-heideggerian thing. The media object, in this case, simulates life and death according to what we perceive as life. By simulating life we objectify it to a greater degree: first, from the perspective of the object doing the simulating, and second, according to the form we have set for the simulation.
Video recordings
| conway2 with written transcript while mouse-writing
Text transcript
References
M. Heidegger, The Thing Game of Life