User:Laurier Rochon/readingnotes/cybertext

Espen J. Aarseth > Cybertext - Perspectives on Ergodic Literature

Define Ergodic : Of or related to certain systems that, given enough time, will eventually return to previously experienced state; Of or relating to a process in which every sequence or sample of sufficient size is equally representative of the whole.

keywords/concepts : cybernetic textuality, semiotics, linguistics, information theory, semiosis, processing, typology of symbols, textual variation, cyborg

• "By naming none I hope to include all" (completely unrelated, just sounds nice)

Intro

• Ergodic literature takes effort to traverse the text, given the extranoematic responsibilities of the reader, added to the eye movement and page turning process, which could characterize non-ergodic literature.

• "Cybertext focuses on the mechanical organization of the text"

• "A cybertext is a machine for the production of variety of expression."

• 'Traditional' linearity in a text means that there is an absence of possibility other than the direction given by the text. From a non-linear perspective (according to the author), the choices not made and the result of decisions not taken are reminded to the reader periodically. Inaccessibility != ambiguity.

• Aarseth's critics were analyzing what was being read, and he focused on what was being read FROM.

• The variable expression of a nonlinear text is often mistaken with the ambiguity of a linear text.

• In linear texts, the reader is passive. "Safe, but impotent"

• "The cybertext reader is a player, a gambler"

• The difference lies between games and narratives

• study of labyrinth - if the concept of it changes during periods, then the concept of text as a labyrinth changes with time, too.

• A footnote as an interactive feature of text : follow the path or not!

• Examples of paper-based Ergodic literature : I Ching (Book of Changes) which has inspired the binary math of computers, Calligrammes (Apollinaire), Composition No.1 (Marc Saporta)

• Examples of computer-based Ergodic works : Listen (Sharon Hopkins), Eliza (Weizenbaum), Adventure (Crowther & Woods), Tale Spin (Meehan), Hypertext (Nelson), TinyMud (Aspnes)

• Old question in a new context : What is a text?

• Author's exploration is based on narratology and rhetoric

• The distinctions that are made between printed and electronic texts are usually historical, technological and always political.

• cybertext = contains some kind of feedback loop

• Can a text never really 'reach itself'? And therefore not exist? (Fish, 1980) - will have to look into this idea.

• "Cybertext is the wide range of possible textualities seen as a typology of machines, as various kinds of literary communications systems where the functional differences among the mechanical parts play a defining role in determining the aesthetic process."

Paradigms and perspectives

• Can self-generating, self-sustaining works like Game of Life be considered a semiotic system?

• "Cybernetic signs are basically mouthpieces for their human designers and programmers"

• Andeersen's typology of symbols : permanence, transience, handling and action. The author will methodically destroy this technique of analysis based on semiotics. He is 'far from convinced' that computer-mediated communication is primarily a semiotic domain.

• Multilinear VS nonlinear VS linear VS multicursal

• What is interaction? Definitions proposed by Andersen and Lippman are obviously not suitable. Also, what does fiction mean?

• cyborg = coined in 1960s, humans + technology.

• The word 'interaction' connotes many, many things, but denotes nothing. It is useless then?

• Haraway's conception of a cyborg as a window to explore the aesthetics of ergodic communication.

A typology of textual communication

• As new media becomes visible, it forces us to look at old media in a new light.

• "The discussion of computer media lack rigorous terminology". True.

• Aarseth tries to create a topology for media...obviously the previous attempts came up short.

• What is text? 1) it cannot operate independently of some material medium, and this influences its behavior 2) a text is not equal to the information it transmits

• 7 variables determine the typology

• After analyzing many texts (both paper and electronic), some interesting results were presented to us. Usually groups of texts cluster together depending on the outcome of the variables determining the typology, and most interesting of all was the way paper and electronic texts were mashed up together. This showed how electronic features were merely emulations of already existing functions of paper texts, and that the paper/electronic dichotomy did not stand.