User:Emily/RW&RM/Trimester 02/02: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


I PAGE ONE <br>
I PAGE ONE <br>
<br>
 
A work of art has always been reproduced in order to help practice,  diffuse, pursuit of gain etc. Mechanical reproduction of a work of art represents something new.  When lithography began to keep pace with printing, it surpassed by photography, the same situation being revealed, when the pictorial reproduction could keep pace with speech, it foreshadowed the sound film. The technical reproduction had reached a standard that not only permitted it to produce all transmitted works of art and thus cause the most profound change in their impact upon the public.  
A work of art has always been reproduced in order to achieve practice,  diffusion and pursuit of gain etc. Mechanical reproduction of a work of art represents something new.  When lithography began to keep pace with printing, it surpassed by photography, the same situation being revealed, when the pictorial reproduction could keep pace with speech, it foreshadowed the sound film. The technical reproduction had reached a standard that not only permitted it to produce all transmitted works of art and thus cause the most profound change in their impact upon the public.  
<br>
<br>


II PAGE TWO <br>
II PAGE TWO <br>
History and authenticity demands for presence of the original, because even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art lacks of its presence in time and space, what’s more, the authenticity of a thing is the essence of all that is transmissible and historical testimony rests on the authenticity. However, technical reproduction is more independent and can make copies out of its own context but enables the original to meet the beholder halfway. Making many reproductions leads to a circle shattering the tradition, within which a plurality of copies substitute for a unique existence by making reproductions, and then it reactivates reproductions after permitting reproduction to meet audiences in its own particular situation. Film is the most representative agent, liquidating of the traditional value of the cultural heritage.
History and authenticity demands for presence of the original, because even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art lacks of its presence in time and space, what’s more, the authenticity of a thing is the essence of all that is transmissible and historical testimony rests on the authenticity. However, technical reproduction is more independent and may would put copies out of its original context. It enables the original to meet the beholder halfway. The eliminated element in the age of mechanical reproduction is subsumed in the term "aura". Making many reproductions leads to a circle shattering the tradition, by which a plurality of copies substitute for a unique existence. And then after permitting reproduction to meet audiences in its own particular situation, it in return reactivates reproductions . Film is the most representative agent, liquidating of the traditional value of the cultural heritage.
<br>
<br>


III PAGE THREE <br>
III PAGE THREE <br>
Human sense perception changes by nature and more historical circumstances. Social transformations are expressed by these changes of perception. the aura decays in the contemporary bases. It is revealed in two circumstances, the desire of contemporary masses to bring things closer spatially and humanly; overcoming the uniqueness of every reality by accepting its reproduction.
Human sense perception changes according to nature and historical circumstances as well. New perception developed along with an art different from antiquity. Social transformations are expressed by these changes of perception. And if changes in the medium of contemporary perception can be comprehended as decay of the aura, it is possible to show its social causes. It is revealed in two circumstances: the desire of contemporary masses to bring things closer spatially and humanly; the bent of desire towards overcoming the uniqueness of every reality by accepting its reproduction.  


IV PAGE FOUR <br>
IV PAGE FOUR <br>
The aura of art works as its uniqueness has its basis in ritual, the location of its original use value. Whereas, art reacted with a theology, it gave rise to pure art.  
The aura of art works as its uniqueness has its basis in ritual, the location of its original use value.  It is recognisable as secularized ritual even in the most profane forms of the cult of beauty. Whereas, art reacted with a certain theology, which gave rise to pure art. An analysis of art in the age of mechanical reproduction must do justice to these relationships, for they lead us to an all-important insight.
<br>
<br>
to be continue
To be continue

Revision as of 23:26, 26 January 2015

Annotation

'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction by Walter Benjamin 1936'

I PAGE ONE

A work of art has always been reproduced in order to achieve practice, diffusion and pursuit of gain etc. Mechanical reproduction of a work of art represents something new. When lithography began to keep pace with printing, it surpassed by photography, the same situation being revealed, when the pictorial reproduction could keep pace with speech, it foreshadowed the sound film. The technical reproduction had reached a standard that not only permitted it to produce all transmitted works of art and thus cause the most profound change in their impact upon the public.

II PAGE TWO
History and authenticity demands for presence of the original, because even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art lacks of its presence in time and space, what’s more, the authenticity of a thing is the essence of all that is transmissible and historical testimony rests on the authenticity. However, technical reproduction is more independent and may would put copies out of its original context. It enables the original to meet the beholder halfway. The eliminated element in the age of mechanical reproduction is subsumed in the term "aura". Making many reproductions leads to a circle shattering the tradition, by which a plurality of copies substitute for a unique existence. And then after permitting reproduction to meet audiences in its own particular situation, it in return reactivates reproductions . Film is the most representative agent, liquidating of the traditional value of the cultural heritage.

III PAGE THREE
Human sense perception changes according to nature and historical circumstances as well. New perception developed along with an art different from antiquity. Social transformations are expressed by these changes of perception. And if changes in the medium of contemporary perception can be comprehended as decay of the aura, it is possible to show its social causes. It is revealed in two circumstances: the desire of contemporary masses to bring things closer spatially and humanly; the bent of desire towards overcoming the uniqueness of every reality by accepting its reproduction.

IV PAGE FOUR
The aura of art works as its uniqueness has its basis in ritual, the location of its original use value. It is recognisable as secularized ritual even in the most profane forms of the cult of beauty. Whereas, art reacted with a certain theology, which gave rise to pure art. An analysis of art in the age of mechanical reproduction must do justice to these relationships, for they lead us to an all-important insight.
To be continue