User:Lidia.Pereira/GPS/10: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
10. Which actions and modes of address prove innefective within the context of the digital multitude? <br> | 10. Which actions and modes of address prove innefective within the context of the digital multitude? <br> | ||
The ideological focus of social media on the individual rather than on the collective presents difficulties to the formation of a political conscience. Not only that, but the political, social and cultural assymetries to be found within the digital multitude midst are an obstacle nearly impossible to transpose. <br> | |||
The ideological focus on the individual rather than on the collective presents difficulties to the formation of a political conscience. Not only that, but the political, social and cultural assymetries to be found within the digital multitude midst are an obstacle nearly impossible to transpose. <br> | I propose is to bring to life a movement that would attempt to go beyond such obstacles and create a platform for the encounter of the atomized voices of the digital age, a demanding force of dialogue amongst the different subjectivities involved, capable of clearly stating their demands within the economics of immaterial labor . Despite the impossibility of such undertaking, it is just like any other utopia - the goal is not to reach it, but to proceed in its direction. <br> | ||
different subjectivities involved, capable of clearly stating their demands within the economics of immaterial labor . Despite the impossibility of such undertaking, it is just like any other utopia - the goal is not to reach it, but to proceed in its direction. <br> | |||
In order to realize my aims it will be necessary for me to study further the articulation of unions throughout history, carefully design a disruptive enough campaign that will gather a few interested people with whom I can then develop the toolkit for the liberation of the multitude, capable of critically disrupting social networking paradigms and of bringing new media campaigning methodologies to the traditional activist discourse. | In order to realize my aims it will be necessary for me to study further the articulation of unions throughout history, carefully design a disruptive enough campaign that will gather a few interested people with whom I can then develop the toolkit for the liberation of the multitude, capable of critically disrupting social networking paradigms and of bringing new media campaigning methodologies to the traditional activist discourse. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:08, 28 October 2014
1. What are the major difficulties in unionizing the multitude?
2. How not to be seen, yet still be represented?
3. Which would be the claims of the immaterial labor union, what would its goal be?
4. How to prevent cooptation and intrumentalization?
5. What are the best tactics to destroy from within?
6. Which part of the population do I aim to reach?
7. How to deal with the space of the minorities within the multitude?
8. How to balance between piecemeal and utopian action?
9. What is the relevance/importance of such a movement?
10. Which actions and modes of address prove innefective within the context of the digital multitude?
The ideological focus of social media on the individual rather than on the collective presents difficulties to the formation of a political conscience. Not only that, but the political, social and cultural assymetries to be found within the digital multitude midst are an obstacle nearly impossible to transpose.
I propose is to bring to life a movement that would attempt to go beyond such obstacles and create a platform for the encounter of the atomized voices of the digital age, a demanding force of dialogue amongst the different subjectivities involved, capable of clearly stating their demands within the economics of immaterial labor . Despite the impossibility of such undertaking, it is just like any other utopia - the goal is not to reach it, but to proceed in its direction.
In order to realize my aims it will be necessary for me to study further the articulation of unions throughout history, carefully design a disruptive enough campaign that will gather a few interested people with whom I can then develop the toolkit for the liberation of the multitude, capable of critically disrupting social networking paradigms and of bringing new media campaigning methodologies to the traditional activist discourse.