User:Eleanorg/2.2/Annotation: Wikipedia:Consensus: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus Wikipedia:Consensus is a Wikipedia policy page, describing its Consensus policy for editing page content. It explains the con...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Achieving consensus can happen in three ways: through editing, through discussion, and (in cases of conflict) through consensus-building. | Achieving consensus can happen in three ways: through editing, through discussion, and (in cases of conflict) through consensus-building. | ||
* ''Consensus through editing'': This is the default and most desired form. "Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus." [2] A related essay linked from this statement, 'Silence and Consensus' [3] (though not a policy document), comments that "Consensus can be presumed to exist until voiced disagreement becomes evident... [because] In wiki-editing, it is difficult to get positive affirmation for your edits..."[4] | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
1. Wikipedia Editors (2013) Wikipedia:Consensus [online]. Accessed 21 Jan 2013 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus. | 1. Wikipedia Editors (2013) Wikipedia:Consensus [online]. Accessed 21 Jan 2013 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus. | ||
2. Ibid. | 2. Ibid. | ||
3. Wikipedia Editors (2013) Wikipedia:Silence and Consensus [online]. Accessed 21 Jan 2013 athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Silence_and_consensus | |||
4. Ibid. | |||
Revision as of 16:58, 21 January 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus
Wikipedia:Consensus is a Wikipedia policy page, describing its Consensus policy for editing page content. It explains the consensus editing process whereby "Decision-making involves an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns, while respecting Wikipedia's norms." [1] Its two main sections cover Achieving Consensus and Determining Consensus. Subsequent sections provide related notes and policies.
Achieving consensus can happen in three ways: through editing, through discussion, and (in cases of conflict) through consensus-building.
- Consensus through editing: This is the default and most desired form. "Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus." [2] A related essay linked from this statement, 'Silence and Consensus' [3] (though not a policy document), comments that "Consensus can be presumed to exist until voiced disagreement becomes evident... [because] In wiki-editing, it is difficult to get positive affirmation for your edits..."[4]
1. Wikipedia Editors (2013) Wikipedia:Consensus [online]. Accessed 21 Jan 2013 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus. 2. Ibid. 3. Wikipedia Editors (2013) Wikipedia:Silence and Consensus [online]. Accessed 21 Jan 2013 athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Silence_and_consensus 4. Ibid.