User:Menno Harder/Cultural Hegenomy

Synopsis Marx *RULING CLASS and RULING IDEAS*
The ruling intellectual force of any society is simultaneously also the class that controls material production. This means that whoever is intellectually stronger over the other will have more power. They rule as thinkers, and are the ones producing ideas and giving structure to society itself by these ruling ideas. They are the dominant force.
The division of labour can be divided into mental and material labour: mental labour is driven by active, concept ideologists, creating ideas and illusions about this class. while the material labour is accepting these ideas and illusions passively and receptively. Hostility between these two classes may occur, but if the whole class itself is endangered this comes to an end.
Examples are given of ruling dominant ideas: during the time of aristocracy the concept of honour and loyalty were dominant, during bourgeoisie the concepts of freedom and equality. These ideas have to have a form of universality in order to survive and also represent them as the only rational, universally valid ones. The class making a revolution represents the whole of society confronting the one ruling class, because it has not yet developed as the particular interest of a particular class. Prove of the hegemony of the spirit in history is confined to three efforts.

Synopsis Gramsci *HISTORY of the SUBALTERN CLASSES*
The history of the ruling classes is also the history of the State and groups of States. This historical unity is created out of the relationship between State (political society) and the civil society. The subaltern classes are not unified, therefore their history is intertwined with civil society and thereby with the history of State. The historian must carefully note all these classes, from their very primitive beginnings. The social group is dominating the antagonistic group, it leads allied groups. It must exercise winning power, when it hold this power, it must continue to lead.
The ideological structure of a dominant class is organised by maintaining, defending and developing the theoretical or ideological front. Gramsci names the publishing houses, political newspapers, periodicals of every kind (scientific, literary, philological, popular). The press is the most dynamic part of this ideological structure of the ruling class. But not the only one, as are libraries, schools, clubs or anything else that influences or can influence public opinion.

Gramsci like Marx talks about the ruling class and it's social class, however, Gramsci states it is not only a base and superstructure. The ruling class as such, in Gramsci's believe, must be investigated and recognised as artificial social constructs ruling the social-class. Gramsci's reasoning behind cultural hegemony comes from within each of these classes themselves, wherein each class has it's own societal purpose and is co-existing within the whole of society.

Cultural hegemony is the social hierarchy on which a society is based. Different classes co-exist and work together within one superstructure and may or may not overlap. Each of these classes has a status quo, or, "the way things are", therefore the sense of feeling part of a bigger structure often lacks, making it impossible to either escape or change society on it's whole. In a way the occupy movement is an example of countering cultural hegemony as it surpasses class or socio-economic ideas within one individual given class. It tries to represent more, or most of them (the 99%). However, to work, it still needs to be picked up by the media and keep refreshing, and growing on it's own (a class itself), and is therefore very fragile to keep existing: when either the media, or it's own believes stop spreading because it is not news-worthy anymore, the movement itself also fails to work.