User:Lor.ensō/projectproposal: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


== 13/11/24 [ W O R K I N P R O G R E S S ] ==
<blockquote>INCORPORATE THIS: I would propose in my project proposal to experiment with developing a method to make an infrastructure for countermapping / anti-campaigning by showing (human) complications and miscalculations as a reaction towards the renders, city marketing and planning, would that make sense, or would I have need to do experimenting NOW and be sure from moment and just start making something of an essay? </blockquote>
<blockquote>INCORPORATE THIS: I would propose in my project proposal to experiment with developing a method to make an infrastructure for countermapping / anti-campaigning by showing (human) complications and miscalculations as a reaction towards the renders, city marketing and planning, would that make sense, or would I have need to do experimenting NOW and be sure from moment and just start making something of an essay? </blockquote>




=== '''What do I want to make?''' ===




°°°°°CLEANING OUT THIS PAGE°°°°°


I want to experiment with developing a method to make an infrastructure for countermapping / anti-campaigning by showing (human) complications, tensions and miscalculations as a reaction towards the renders, city marketing and planning with stories and anecdotes I collected and search for ways of developing a platform. I want


== What do you want to make? ==
I want to


Using drawings as an alternative to the hollow representation that 'shape' Rotterdam.
experiment with developing a method to  


I am searching for a right way to visualize the tensions.  The human touch as reminder of the (in)humane complications.
make an infrastructure for countermapping / anti-campaigning


3D renders are calculated and these are over simplified for the sake of entertainment, marketing
by showing (human) complications, tensions and miscalculations as a reaction towards the renders, city marketing and planning


I order to reflect / criticize the city, I want to start at the first tile and then zooming out towards 'the big picture'
with stories and anecdotes I collected and search for ways of developing a platform. 


In this project I want to draw out harsh alternative looks to postcard utopianism
.


Making a (few) series based on contexts which are based on finding miscalculations and a result of this could be a series of miscalculations as countermap.  
== How do you plan to make it? ==
Through organizing a set of sessions that could be comparable to the [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Lor.ens%C5%8D#/XPUB2/PROTOTYPING/COLLOQUIUM/ colloquium] where I gave my
<syntaxhighlight lang="qvto">
"Search for examples of city planning / marketing / maintenance of the city/village/township where you are from*"
collect img / promises / memories                    
then.......
ask yourself / eachother "how does -location- relate to you as the inhabitant*?"
aaand thennn  
ask yourself / eachother "how do you relate to -location-?"
</syntaxhighlight>
free interpretation ofcourse, whatever feels the most comfortable


Using drawings as an alternative to the hollow representation that 'shape' Rotterdam.


Beginning from the personal small tile of context that includes reality. Slowly zooming out towards the future renders and ideas. Showing examples and
I am searching for a right way to visualize the tensions.  The human touch as reminder of the (in)humane complications. 
 
=== '''How do you plan to make it?''' ===
Exploring multiple ways of drawing. From actual hands-on to annotated renders.
 
 
 
"where you come from": how does this city profile itself?
"what do you want to change": which axes do you want to add?
 
=== '''What is your timetable?''' ===
November - 
 
December -
 
January -
 
February -
 
March -
 
April -
 
May -
 
June -
 
=== '''Who can help you and how?''' ===
 
 
=== '''Why do you want to make it?''' ===
 
=== '''Relation to previous practice''' ===
 
 
POINXS / Video essays /
 
=== '''Relation to a larger context''' ===
Gentrification / urban decay / etc
 
 
=== '''References/bibliography''' ===
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
athens: infrastructural tours
 
oslo: visual identity; we just copy paste a typeface everywhere, not adopt it to a specific place
 
-
 
"collective jam session for research" nice
- pretty open session... intentionally?
-
 
 
from the municipality pov... from the specific needs pov...
 
 
- from which perspective do you speak?
       
issue of time gaps, not living there anymore, .. interestingly brings up the specificness of perspective
       
tourists (alessia), youth (anita), disabilities (maria), city marketing (bernadette), pets (maria), city design (victor/zuzu), history (mania), biggest/tallest records (mania), advertisements (mania), city planning (riviera)
   
 
-
 
- unpack!
   
- video municipality.. time to observe together?
   
 
- quote Jara Rocha + Femke Snelting
 
 
- xyzt axes, what do they do, where are they used?
 
 
How will collected material be used?
 
 
Why are we doing this?
 
Work towards concrete outputs?
 
 
 
Personal perspective works!
 
 
Moment of sharing after first part would work
 
---
 
 
XYZT+? as a method
method to critique + reflect (!)
building infrastructure for this method as a way to circulate it
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
== 24/10/24 ==
 
=== What do you want to make? ===
A way / method, to showcase virtual/physical clashes with contexts and representations. Possibility is, a visual essay based on an inner/outer mono or dialogue I'm currently having considering the rendered imagery of Rotterdam used in both (simulator) games and future architectural concepts of Rotterdam. But also going out of my bubble and reflect on multiple views rather than only my personal render.
 
=== How do you plan to make it? ===
I did a colloquium which was a good attempt in gather and discussing reflective criticism. Using a methodology gives me more freedoms and restrictions.
 
 
 
 
Using a sort of 'framework' that uses 'bricks' of information and places it in the context of both the complex realities of a city vs the hollow representations. To reflect.
 
=== What is your timetable? ===
October: <blockquote>Read up on previously saved sources. Start sketching and writing thoughts down, collecting both sides.</blockquote>November:<blockquote>Think about the outcome. start the design and think of it either being a moving image, online or offline zine, a mocksite, etc.
 
Make a first draft for the first public moment. Maybe trigger a discussion. An anti-campaign. <s>Parody? Satire?</s> 
 
I am not sure if satire is the way, merely showing the THE LACK THAT IS BINDING / CRACKS.
 
4nov: do a walk-in type deal and develop some sort of way to ask for contributions.
 
23nov deliver </blockquote>December:<blockquote>Continue and have something to show / discuss in Gent, to reflect in the project proposal and thesis outline. Have something of a 1,5-2 draft for the break to pick up after the winter break.</blockquote>January
 
February
 
March
 
April
 
May
 
June
 
=== Why do you want to make it? ===
I'm in confusion by the idea of vision / images of the city through virtual representation. Mostly, because I feel that is an image that lacks multiple layers of complex contexts:
 
Accessibility(concerning disability)
 
livability (concerning the housing crisis)
 
affordability(pushing away the inhabitants).
 
leisureability (queer / underground scenes / festivals / gigs / event)
 
=== Who can help you and how? ===
<s>Reading up on FemkeSnelting / Michael recently gave me a source about MassMoving which was more about public interventions</s>
 
=== Relation to previous practice ===
POINXS / Video essays /
 
=== Relation to a larger context ===
Gentrification / urban decay / etc
 
=== References/bibliography ===
V                                          https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Lorenderesearchannotationpad
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FEEDBACK FROM MANIA / ANITA / MARLOES =
It is not clear 'visual essay' / website / game. too abstract and broad -> in depth explained to
Comic Book? -> dive into it.  // Same
A lot of different points -> so many of these different HUGE topics.-> how do I link / elimination.
The focus point is '''''the lack. Concern'''''
 
What> visual essay > found footage > own footage / mixture? > documentation > personal POV vs marketing > contrast > gemeente represent vs lorenzo 
 
<s>hyperlink > same page</s> 
 
'''''<u>*supernice*</u>'''''
 
=== **THE LACK THAT IS BINDING / CRACKS** ===
<s>Blending the PMOMM AND PROTOTYPE / CONCEPT</s>
 
tactical media / venue -> SARS -> facemasks --> new supermarket -> don't come to the opening ->  Anita en Mania sturen het nog op
 
=== What do you want to make? ===
A visual essay based on an inner/outer mono or dialogue I'm currently having considering the rendered imagery of Rotterdam used in both (simulator) games and future architectural concepts of Rotterdam.
 
=== How do you plan to make it? ===
Using a sort of 'framework' that uses 'bricks' of information and places it in the context of both the complex realities of a city vs the hollow representations. To reflect.
 
=== What is your timetable? ===
October: <blockquote>Read up on previously saved sources. Start sketching and writing thoughts down, collecting both sides.</blockquote>November:<blockquote>Think about the outcome. start the design and think of it either being a moving image, online or offline zine, a mocksite, etc.
 
Make a first draft for the first public moment. Maybe trigger a discussion. An anti-campaign. Parody? Satire?</blockquote>December:<blockquote>Continue and have something to show / discuss in Gent, to reflect in the project proposal and thesis outline. Have something of a 1,5-2 draft for the break to pick up after the winter break.</blockquote>January
 
February
 
March
 
April
 
May
 
June


=== Why do you want to make it? ===
Describe how you will go about developing your project and research through reading, writing and practice. In other words, through a combination of these approaches, you will explore questions or interests you have laid out in your general introduction.  In this section you can help us understand how your project will come together on a practical level and talk about possible outcome(s).  Of course, the outcome(s) may change as your research evolves, but it's important at this stage to have some concrete idea of how your project could come together as a whole.  
I'm in confusion by the idea of vision / images of the city through virtual representation. Mostly, because I feel that is an image that lacks multiple layers of complex contexts:


Accessibility(concerning disability)
== What is your timetable? ==
Please include a timeline of which steps you will take and the order in which those things will be done, in other words, what needs to be done and when.


livability (concerning the housing crisis)
== Why do you want to make it? ==
Describe your motivation for undertaking this project.


affordability(pushing away the inhabitants).
== Who can help you and how? ==
List the people that could help you realise your project and how they could help you, in other words, the support you hope to receive.


leisureability (queer / underground scenes / festivals / gigs / event)
== Relation to previous practice ==
Describe how your research connects to previous projects you have done. Here you can use the descriptions you made during the Methods seminar or make new descriptions.


=== Who can help you and how? ===
== Relation to a larger context ==
<s>Reading up on FemkeSnelting / Michael recently gave me a source about MassMoving which was more about public interventions</s>
Describe how your project is situated within a larger context of practices or ideas.  Write briefly about other projects or theoretical material which share an affinity with your project.  For example, if you are researching urban interventions, you might want to research about Situationist approaches to psychogeography, urban tactical media and activist strategies of reclaiming the streets.  Or, if you want to explore the way data is tracked, you might touch upon the politics of data mining by referencing concerns laid out by the Electronic Frontier or highlight theoretical questions raised by Wendy Chun or others.  (Keep in mind that we are *not* expecting well formulated conclusions or persuasive arguments in the proposal phase.  At this juncture, it's simply about showing an awareness of a broader context, which you will later build upon as your research progresses.)


=== Relation to previous practice ===
== References ==
POINXS / Video essays /
A list of references[1] used in the text supplemented with key works that are currently informing your practice.[2]


=== Relation to a larger context ===
[1] As with your previous essays, the references need to be formatted according to the [[Harvard method]].)
Gentrification / urban decay / etc


=== References/bibliography ===
[2] Remember that dictionaries, encyclopedias and wikipedia are not references to be listed. These are starting points which should lead to more substantial texts and practices.)
V                                          https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Lorenderesearchannotationpad


== PROTOTYPE SPACE ==
== How do you plan to make it? ==
{{User:Lor.ensō/Renderdam}}
2 How do you plan to make it? Do the steps proposed sound feasible? Are there any steps omitted?
3 What is your timetable? Does the timing of the project’s realisation sound feasible?
4 Why do you want to make it? Is the motivation for undertaking the project clear? If not, how can this be improved?
5 Who can help you and how? Are there people in your network that might be of help in developing this project?
6 Relation to previous practice: Is it clear how this project builds upon work done before
7 Relation to a larger context: Is it clear how the work is embedded in a broader context of art works, theory, etc.?
8 References/bibliography: Are there any references or sources you feel are connected to this project?

Revision as of 14:16, 18 November 2024

INCORPORATE THIS: I would propose in my project proposal to experiment with developing a method to make an infrastructure for countermapping / anti-campaigning by showing (human) complications and miscalculations as a reaction towards the renders, city marketing and planning, would that make sense, or would I have need to do experimenting NOW and be sure from moment and just start making something of an essay?



°°°°°CLEANING OUT THIS PAGE°°°°°


What do you want to make?

I want to

experiment with developing a method to

make an infrastructure for countermapping / anti-campaigning

by showing (human) complications, tensions and miscalculations as a reaction towards the renders, city marketing and planning

with stories and anecdotes I collected and search for ways of developing a platform. 


How do you plan to make it?

Through organizing a set of sessions that could be comparable to the colloquium where I gave my

"Search for examples of city planning / marketing / maintenance of the city/village/township where you are from*" 
collect img / promises / memories 					                     
then....... 
ask yourself / eachother "how does -location- relate to you as the inhabitant*?"
aaand thennn  
ask yourself / eachother "how do you relate to -location-?"

free interpretation ofcourse, whatever feels the most comfortable

Using drawings as an alternative to the hollow representation that 'shape' Rotterdam.

I am searching for a right way to visualize the tensions.  The human touch as reminder of the (in)humane complications. 

Describe how you will go about developing your project and research through reading, writing and practice. In other words, through a combination of these approaches, you will explore questions or interests you have laid out in your general introduction. In this section you can help us understand how your project will come together on a practical level and talk about possible outcome(s). Of course, the outcome(s) may change as your research evolves, but it's important at this stage to have some concrete idea of how your project could come together as a whole.

What is your timetable?

Please include a timeline of which steps you will take and the order in which those things will be done, in other words, what needs to be done and when.

Why do you want to make it?

Describe your motivation for undertaking this project.

Who can help you and how?

List the people that could help you realise your project and how they could help you, in other words, the support you hope to receive.

Relation to previous practice

Describe how your research connects to previous projects you have done. Here you can use the descriptions you made during the Methods seminar or make new descriptions.

Relation to a larger context

Describe how your project is situated within a larger context of practices or ideas. Write briefly about other projects or theoretical material which share an affinity with your project. For example, if you are researching urban interventions, you might want to research about Situationist approaches to psychogeography, urban tactical media and activist strategies of reclaiming the streets. Or, if you want to explore the way data is tracked, you might touch upon the politics of data mining by referencing concerns laid out by the Electronic Frontier or highlight theoretical questions raised by Wendy Chun or others. (Keep in mind that we are *not* expecting well formulated conclusions or persuasive arguments in the proposal phase. At this juncture, it's simply about showing an awareness of a broader context, which you will later build upon as your research progresses.)

References

A list of references[1] used in the text supplemented with key works that are currently informing your practice.[2]

[1] As with your previous essays, the references need to be formatted according to the Harvard method.)

[2] Remember that dictionaries, encyclopedias and wikipedia are not references to be listed. These are starting points which should lead to more substantial texts and practices.)

How do you plan to make it?

2 How do you plan to make it? Do the steps proposed sound feasible? Are there any steps omitted? 3 What is your timetable? Does the timing of the project’s realisation sound feasible? 4 Why do you want to make it? Is the motivation for undertaking the project clear? If not, how can this be improved? 5 Who can help you and how? Are there people in your network that might be of help in developing this project? 6 Relation to previous practice: Is it clear how this project builds upon work done before 7 Relation to a larger context: Is it clear how the work is embedded in a broader context of art works, theory, etc.? 8 References/bibliography: Are there any references or sources you feel are connected to this project?