User:Eleanorg/1.2/Thematic/Halfway Presentation: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
Line 122: Line 122:




* How much control over content should the central node have?
How 'porous'/vulnerable should the work be to participants' input? <br />
* Should hosts decide what content they take guardianship of?
What should 'hosts' role be - curating, or blind solidarity? <br />

Revision as of 21:34, 2 April 2012

<slidy theme="aa" />


Archives need at once a guardian and a localization
Derrida, Archive Fever


The question of land refuses to go away.
Hakim Bey, Post Anarchism Anarchy

last trimester: geographic/virtual distance

ShipTrack1.png ShipTrack2.png ShipTrack3.png ShipTrack4.png

RouteTracer1.png

Real Politic of server location

CensoredImagesExamples.jpg

Just as 'cyberspace' fantasy denies the body, so FB deems 'bodily' content out of place there



Interviews with grassroots hosting providers


An example: although I'm opposed to fox hunting, I believe that it is the right of people to... express their desire to do it. Therefore if the government outlawed the expression of the right to hunt foxes, then I would support a blog of people wishing to express that right.
- Network 23 hosting collective member


Hosting a group does not meant they cannot have a web presence - they need to find another provider. If they cannot, there is nothing to stop them getting the skills to set up their own hosting. Part of the principle behind ox4 comes from it's anarcho-roots whereby people shouldn't be coerced into doing work that they do not want to do. hosting a group that we didn't agree with 'politically' would be doing this type of work.
- OX4 hosting collective member


we ask everyone who requests a blog to agree to the terms upon request. ...If we find that someone doesn't then we reserve the right to disable their blog. I didn't used to hold that view for Indymedia, I was of the opinion that whatever goes, that being selective was censorship. But over the years having seen the trouble caused by being laissez-faire about policy... I'm more judgmental about it these days.
- Network 23 hosting collective member

Even in decentralised networks, the server's guardian & localization determine inclusion/exclusion

The Distributed Archive

Stars1.png Stars2.png

Stars3.png Stars4.png

linking code to personal research interests: physical vs virtual presence; boundary of self/other - sociality, fragility
previous versions: html. Now with ImageMagick.

Inspirations

SOPA blackouts

SOPA-Blackout-for-WordPress_1.png

DeadDrops.jpg

p54_f_1295521851.jpg

How to raise the issue of physical location without going completely offline?

Bodybook

CensoredImagesProjectSketch1.png

StorageJewellery1.jpg

Wtf.JPG
MariePortraitSmall.JPG
PetraPortraitSmall.JPG


My first thoughts were that I would leave the card in my wallet and not check its contents. ...The data remains abstract/imaginary. [But] when I saw the censored image the data gained visual form and meaning, and as a result the 'act of hosting' for me became a very conscious act. In this instance, the 'host' is not a passive participant but in knowing the contents becomes implicit and actively responsible for keeping the data in their possession.

Issues to explore

Let's face it: we're undone by each other. And if we're not, we're missing something. ...One does not always stay intact.
Judith Butler, Beside Oneself: on the Limits of Sexual Autonomy


How 'porous'/vulnerable should the work be to participants' input?
What should 'hosts' role be - curating, or blind solidarity?