User:Thijshijsijsjss/Notes on SI22: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
(Add quote by Steve)
(Expand on my discussion on week 1's methods class)
Line 85: Line 85:
* Print to the lineprinter: <code>echo "[message]" > /dev/usb/lp0</code>
* Print to the lineprinter: <code>echo "[message]" > /dev/usb/lp0</code>


==Methods==
==[[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/20-09-2023_-Event_1|Methods]]==
What is annotating? In it's simplest form: shouting at your TV.


How do I annotate?
[[File:Gear for annotating.jpg|300px|thumb|right|alt=Thijs's gear for annotating|Selected gear I use for annotating (zoom in for a description of this layout)]]
 
What is annotating? In it's simplest form: shouting at your TV. We spend some time thinking about the way we currently annotate (examining this Protocol). How do I annotate?
* It depends on the origin of the to-be-annotated work and the purpose of my annotation, but the common denominator tends to be the use of color to structure both the work as well as my notes.
* It depends on the origin of the to-be-annotated work and the purpose of my annotation, but the common denominator tends to be the use of color to structure both the work as well as my notes.
* I tend to prefer physical annotation, because it feels like my annotations are more transformative for the work. Especially when collaborating.
* I tend to prefer physical annotation, because it feels like my annotations are more transformative for the work. Especially when collaborating.


''Notetaking can be an act of generosity.''
Some nice quotes from / through Steve:
*''Notetaking can be an act of generosity.''
*''Every text creates a reader.''
 
Together with Victor, Bernadette and Rosa, I read the text ''On the data set's ruins''. We spend quite a big portion of the allocated time on creating, adhering to and reflecting on a reading Protocol (see [https://pad.xpub.nl/p/AnnotateDataset'sRuins pad]). I noticed I felt more at ease during this discussion. I figure it might have to do with the following aspects:
*Me being more familiar with the article's contents, and hence feeling more confident to speak
*The smaller group size being less intimidating to speak up -- and more easily invited to engage.
*In particular, it might be interesting to reflect on whether the presence of our Protocol had an effect on my at-easeness. It might have, in the sense that I did not have to worry about internally deciding when or where to make a comment: I just had to follow the Protocol.
 
After this group discussion, we met back with the whole class to discuss our findings (on Protocols and subject matter). In this plenary session, I felt more inclined to speak up that earlier that day. Is this me getting used to the implied Protocols of this class?


=Week 2=
=Week 2=

Revision as of 19:19, 20 September 2023

This page reports on my explorations, findings, unfindings and (more) during Special Issue 22. In the spirit of the wiki, I will resist my current urge to write this introduction in detail -- because I can't write it in detail, yet.

Week 1

Tour at WORM

Field Recording task

My field recording explorations

Show

Maria, Victor and Bernadette are this show's Caretakers. They are present in the Radio WORM studio, while the rest of us are gathered around stereo boxes connected to the (previously tellingly broken) digital screen. Communication between Caretakers and the Caretakers' caretakers goes via an Etherpad. This communication is semi-continuous. I notice I am hesitant to write in it.

(Retroactive) playlist

Time Data Content
0-25 20.6MB About Radio Aporee
25-27 3MB Chat from Victor, Bernadette
27-53 23MB Collective Audio Field Recording
53- 57 ~3MB Studio Field Recording
57 -65 ~11.5MB Cassette Tape Recording
65-68 1.5MB Bells
68-70 1MB Victor: making the mixtape
70-77 4 MB Riffusion Jingle
77-86 ? Maria Reads a text (might be called 'Snow', might be by 'Ina Blom')
86-98 ~11MB? Aporee Mix / Voices / Westminster
98-105 6MB droning windows movie maker music + voices
105-120 15MB? The remainder

Shownotes discussion

In the afternoon after the show, we had a discussion with the classroom, this show's caretakers, Michael and Joseph. There are some important takeaways (for me):

  • We all like the tension between a preprogrammed playlist and improvisation and the mysterious dynamic it creates for the listerner.
    • Personally, I was impressed by the cohesion of the show.
  • We liked the overlays between music / sounds / voices. There is some balancing here that is important, it is easy to overwhelm the listener.
  • One of the highlight's of the show was when the caretaker's used the etherpad as a script. This back-and-forth between the caretakers and the classroom is something to be fleshed out over the coming week(s).

We have chosen new caretakers already. Actually, my first instinct was not to pick them already. It will be interesting to see how this will change the dynamic between programmed and improvisational radio. Something to reflect on next week.

Prototyping

Tuesday afternoon we had our first prototyping session. In it, we set up a Raspberry Pi and create our own personal user profiles on it. Some useful commands we used today:

  • Log in to the pi: ssh thijsoid@145.24.139.16
  • Broadcast a message: wall [message]
  • Print to the lineprinter: echo "[message]" > /dev/usb/lp0

Methods

Thijs's gear for annotating
Selected gear I use for annotating (zoom in for a description of this layout)

What is annotating? In it's simplest form: shouting at your TV. We spend some time thinking about the way we currently annotate (examining this Protocol). How do I annotate?

  • It depends on the origin of the to-be-annotated work and the purpose of my annotation, but the common denominator tends to be the use of color to structure both the work as well as my notes.
  • I tend to prefer physical annotation, because it feels like my annotations are more transformative for the work. Especially when collaborating.

Some nice quotes from / through Steve:

  • Notetaking can be an act of generosity.
  • Every text creates a reader.

Together with Victor, Bernadette and Rosa, I read the text On the data set's ruins. We spend quite a big portion of the allocated time on creating, adhering to and reflecting on a reading Protocol (see pad). I noticed I felt more at ease during this discussion. I figure it might have to do with the following aspects:

  • Me being more familiar with the article's contents, and hence feeling more confident to speak
  • The smaller group size being less intimidating to speak up -- and more easily invited to engage.
  • In particular, it might be interesting to reflect on whether the presence of our Protocol had an effect on my at-easeness. It might have, in the sense that I did not have to worry about internally deciding when or where to make a comment: I just had to follow the Protocol.

After this group discussion, we met back with the whole class to discuss our findings (on Protocols and subject matter). In this plenary session, I felt more inclined to speak up that earlier that day. Is this me getting used to the implied Protocols of this class?

Week 2

...

Ethereal library