Archive & Memory: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:
General introduction. +  
General introduction. +  
Student presentation by each student of max. 10 min of your work and expectations you have of the Thematic Project.
Student presentation by each student of max. 10 min of your work and expectations you have of the Thematic Project.


'''January 17:''' Archives
'''January 17:''' Archives
Line 28: Line 29:
10:00 - 12:00
10:00 - 12:00
Discussion of texts below
Discussion of texts below
examples: [http://prezi.com/5s4jgplmpf4g/archives-artists/]


13.00 - 17:00  
13.00 - 17:00  
Line 39: Line 42:


Jacques Derrida (1995) ''Archive Fever. A Freudian Impression.'' pp. 9-21. [http://pzwart3.wdka.hro.nl/wiki/File:Derrida_archive_fever_1995.pdf]
Jacques Derrida (1995) ''Archive Fever. A Freudian Impression.'' pp. 9-21. [http://pzwart3.wdka.hro.nl/wiki/File:Derrida_archive_fever_1995.pdf]
Arjun Appadurai, Archive and Aspiration. In ''Information is Alive'', edited by Joke Brouwer and Arjen Mulder  14-25. Rotterdam: V2_Publishing/NAI Publishers, pp.14-25 (2003) [https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:y_TPIXAVkioJ:entreculturas.info/system/docs/10/original/Appadurai._Archive_and_Aspiration.pdf%3F1276464953+Arjun+Appadurai,+Archive+and+Aspiration&hl=nl&gl=nl&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiacS5jPQMIcZtfS_3q3mLofyDCJtNsqpLQhsxLV8gC7xvAzSubZf2t-p3GP22gu6EgmIDelXduk8UPgHNxy2iGOQzKMfn_dNTBaqy266onoKAc1XsN_anCYBnLotu7RzQ_rXqS&sig=AHIEtbTGYfwyhebE6NwUZmMQkJEaATD9GQ]


''optional:''
''optional:''
Line 47: Line 48:
Contradictions (pp.149-156)
Contradictions (pp.149-156)


'''January 24:'''


Briet, Suzanne (1951, English translation 2006) ''What is Documentation?'' Lanham, Maryland:  
'''January 24:''' Databases
Scarecrow Press Inc.
 
'''''reading:'''''
 
Briet, Suzanne (1951, English translation 2006) ''What is Documentation?'' Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press Inc.


Lev Manovich (2007) Database as Symbolic Form. In: ''Database Aesthetics. Art in the Age of Information Overflow'', edited by Victoria Vesna. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp.39-60.
Lev Manovich (2007) Database as Symbolic Form. In: ''Database Aesthetics. Art in the Age of Information Overflow'', edited by Victoria Vesna. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp.39-60.


''screening (among others):'''''Bold text'''
Arjun Appadurai, Archive and Aspiration. In ''Information is Alive'', edited by Joke Brouwer and Arjen Mulder  14-25. Rotterdam: V2_Publishing/NAI Publishers, pp.14-25 (2003) [https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:y_TPIXAVkioJ:entreculturas.info/system/docs/10/original/Appadurai._Archive_and_Aspiration.pdf%3F1276464953+Arjun+Appadurai,+Archive+and+Aspiration&hl=nl&gl=nl&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiacS5jPQMIcZtfS_3q3mLofyDCJtNsqpLQhsxLV8gC7xvAzSubZf2t-p3GP22gu6EgmIDelXduk8UPgHNxy2iGOQzKMfn_dNTBaqy266onoKAc1XsN_anCYBnLotu7RzQ_rXqS&sig=AHIEtbTGYfwyhebE6NwUZmMQkJEaATD9GQ]
 
 
'''''screening (among others):'''''


Francoise Levie, The man who wanted to classify the world.
Francoise Levie, The man who wanted to classify the world.


January 31:


February 7:
----
 
'''>> everything below is preliminary and subject to changes <<'''
 
 
'''January 31:''' Data: data gathering, scraping, searching
 
Andrew Goffey (2008) Algorithm. In: Software Studies. A Lexicon, edited by Matthew Fuller. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp.15-20.
 
Sabine Niederer, Wisdom of the Crowd or Technicity of Content? Wikipedia as a socio-technical system.
 
Clay Shirky (2005) “Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags.” http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html
 
visit: Beeld en Geluid, Hilversum (to be confirmed)
 
 
'''February 7:'''
 
 
'''February 14:''' Data: remixing, appropriation, variability
 
Lev Manovich (2005) Remixability and Modularity. www.manovich.net/DOCS/Remix_modular.doc


February 14:
Liam Buckley (2008) Objects of Love and Decay: Colonial Photographs in a Postcolonial Archive. Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 249 – 270.
 
Wendy Chun (2011) Deamonic Interfaces, Empowering Obfuscations. In: Programmed Visions, Wendy Chun. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp.59-95.
 
 
'''February 21:''' Time '''>> date will change, to coincide with Sonic Acts Festival in Amsterdam'''


February 21:


'''February 28: Spring Break'''
'''February 28: Spring Break'''


(to be expanded)


<span style='font-size:18px;font-weight:bold;text-transform:uppercase;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;display:block;padding:5px;background:#666;color:#fff;width:350px;'>'''References, Resources and Links'''</span>
'''March 6:''' Memory
 
Aristotle
 
David Lowenthal (1998) ‘Fabricating Heritage’. History & Memory Volume 10, Number 1.
 
Wendy Chun (2008) Enduring Ephemerality
 
 
'''March 13:''' Assessments
 
 
'''March 20:''' Glitch: loss & forgetting
 
 
'''March 27:''' Documentation & Performativity
 
Walter Benjamin, ‘The task of the translator’ (introduction to a Beaudelaire translation, 1923) http://www.scribd.com/doc/12733233/Walter-Benjamin-the-Task-of-Translator
 
Becky Edmunds, Enjoy the Gap
 
Olia Lialina (2000) Ein Link Waere Schone Genug, http://art.teleportacia.org/observation/du.html
 
 
Visit NIMk, Amsterdam




'''Reading:'''  
'''April 3: PRESENTATIONS'''






Screening:
<span style='font-size:18px;font-weight:bold;text-transform:uppercase;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;display:block;padding:5px;background:#666;color:#fff;width:350px;'>'''References, Resources and Links'''</span>




Links:





Revision as of 14:18, 18 January 2012

File sharing!.jpg

Archive & Memory

An archive is a collection of documents and records, such as letters, official papers, photographs, recorded material, or computer files that is preserved for historical purposes. As such, an archive is considered a site of the past, a place that contains traces of a collective memory of a nation, a people or a social group. Artists have always shown an interest in archives, either as inspiration for their own work, or to use and re-appropriate material. An archive has therefore become a site of reproduction. Although often not recognised as archives, commercial sites like YouTube and Facebook are examples of this: documents are posted and reposted all the time in these environments. Previously regarded as tedious repositories of the past, with the additional stereotype of archivists as spinsters who were picky, hardworking, standoffish, and, by most accounts, pitiable enforcers of orders and structures, today the image of archives is changing. They are becoming exciting places where one can adapt and appropriate through processes of cut-and-paste.

An archive was once a place to preserve the past, to build legacies as well as to remember and recognise the roots from which to grow. However, as Michel Foucault reminds us, memories and archives do not survive by chance but are constructed to serve structures of power. Thus, the shape of an archive constrains and enables the content it encloses, and the technical methods for building and supporting an archive produces the document for collection. After all, the word ‘archive’ is derived from the Greek arkhē, which means government or order, origin and first place. However, digital technologies have changed and altered the status and meaning of an archive. The creation of documents and their aggregation into all sorts of different – especially online – archives has become part of everyday life. Archives are now being collectively built. As Arjun Appadurai asserts in his text Archive and Aspiration, ‘we should begin to see all documentation as intervention, and all archiving as part of some sort of collective project. Rather than being the tomb of the trace, the archive, is more frequently the product of the anticipation of collective memory.’

It could be argued that whether the archive is composed of print, photographs, film and/or digital media, the technologies used to organise, search and share documents have taken over the purview of a state, with the crowd acting as the control mechanism. Digital archives have changed from a stable entity into flexible systems, referred to with the popular term ‘Living Archives’. But in which ways do these changes affect our relationship to the past, present and future? What are the implications for this mode of forgetting, for memories, as well as for what is suppressed? Will the erased, forgotten and neglected be redeemed, and new social memories be allowed? Will the fictional versus factual mode of archiving offer the democracy that the public domain implies, or is it another way for public instruments of power to operate?

These and other questions will be addressed and discussed from the perspective of both lens-based and networked media, by looking at different topics that relate to archive and memory, from database to narrative, time, and the glitch, and through the works of (among others) Johan Grimonprez, Chris Marker, Geoffrey Bowker, Lynn Hershmann, Paul Otlet, Suzanne Briet, Rosa Menkman, Graham Harwood, Thomson & Craighead, David Lowenthal, Etoy, Walter Benjamin. There will be additional visits to Beeld & Geluid (home of the National Broadcasting Archives and owner of unique audio-visual collections), Hilversum; Sonic Acts Festival, Amsterdam; and Netherlands Media Art Institute (an institute dedicated to video and media art), Amsterdam.

Thematic Seminar taught by Annet Dekker

Annet Dekker is independent curator and researcher. Subjects of interest are the influence of technology, science and popular culture on art and vice versa. Currently she works as webcurator for SKOR, as researcher on the project ”Born Digital art in Dutch art collections” for SBMK, VP, NIMk and DEN, as lecturer at Piet Zwart Institute for the thematic project “Archive & Memory” and new media theory at Rietveld Academy. In 2009 she initiated aaaan.net with Annette Wolfsberger. At the moment they organise the Artist in Residence programme at the Netherlands Media Art Institute in Amsterdam and they produced Funware, an international touring exhibition in 2010 and 2011 about fun in software (curated by Olga Goriunova). Since 2008 she is writing a PhD on strategies for documenting net art at the Centre for Cultural Studies, Goldsmiths, University of London, under supervision of Matthew Fuller. http://aaaan.net

Schedule

Unless otherwise specified, the Archive & Memory Seminar will take place on Tuesdays.

January 10: 10:00-18:00 General introduction. + Student presentation by each student of max. 10 min of your work and expectations you have of the Thematic Project.


January 17: Archives

10:00 - 12:00 Discussion of texts below

examples: [1]

13.00 - 17:00 Screenings by Simon Pummell

Required Reading:

Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge. And the Discourse on Language. New York: Vintage Books (1972 - edition 2010) Introduction (pp.3-17) The historical a priori and the archive (pp.126-131)

Jacques Derrida (1995) Archive Fever. A Freudian Impression. pp. 9-21. [2]

optional: Foucault, Archaeology of Knowledge: Archaeology and the history of ideas (pp.135-140) and The original and the regular (pp.141-148) Contradictions (pp.149-156)


January 24: Databases

reading:

Briet, Suzanne (1951, English translation 2006) What is Documentation? Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press Inc.

Lev Manovich (2007) Database as Symbolic Form. In: Database Aesthetics. Art in the Age of Information Overflow, edited by Victoria Vesna. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp.39-60.

Arjun Appadurai, Archive and Aspiration. In Information is Alive, edited by Joke Brouwer and Arjen Mulder 14-25. Rotterdam: V2_Publishing/NAI Publishers, pp.14-25 (2003) [3]


screening (among others):

Francoise Levie, The man who wanted to classify the world.



>> everything below is preliminary and subject to changes <<


January 31: Data: data gathering, scraping, searching

Andrew Goffey (2008) Algorithm. In: Software Studies. A Lexicon, edited by Matthew Fuller. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp.15-20.

Sabine Niederer, Wisdom of the Crowd or Technicity of Content? Wikipedia as a socio-technical system.

Clay Shirky (2005) “Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags.” http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html

visit: Beeld en Geluid, Hilversum (to be confirmed)


February 7:


February 14: Data: remixing, appropriation, variability

Lev Manovich (2005) Remixability and Modularity. www.manovich.net/DOCS/Remix_modular.doc

Liam Buckley (2008) Objects of Love and Decay: Colonial Photographs in a Postcolonial Archive. Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 249 – 270.

Wendy Chun (2011) Deamonic Interfaces, Empowering Obfuscations. In: Programmed Visions, Wendy Chun. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp.59-95.


February 21: Time >> date will change, to coincide with Sonic Acts Festival in Amsterdam


February 28: Spring Break


March 6: Memory

Aristotle

David Lowenthal (1998) ‘Fabricating Heritage’. History & Memory Volume 10, Number 1.

Wendy Chun (2008) Enduring Ephemerality


March 13: Assessments


March 20: Glitch: loss & forgetting


March 27: Documentation & Performativity

Walter Benjamin, ‘The task of the translator’ (introduction to a Beaudelaire translation, 1923) http://www.scribd.com/doc/12733233/Walter-Benjamin-the-Task-of-Translator

Becky Edmunds, Enjoy the Gap

Olia Lialina (2000) Ein Link Waere Schone Genug, http://art.teleportacia.org/observation/du.html


Visit NIMk, Amsterdam


April 3: PRESENTATIONS


References, Resources and Links



Quick Links to PZI Wiki Pages

Calendar

Student Pages

Wiki Main Page



Notes-on essays