Miri's XPUB2 thesis outline: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
Line 56: Line 56:


something very intelligent
something very intelligent
(yet to come)
== Thesis: Glossary ==


(yet to come)
(yet to come)

Revision as of 18:45, 16 November 2022

Background

Key issues

  • Memes and their political dimension
  • Infiltration of public space as an art strategy
  • The potential of memefying daily life

Internet memes have developed into a kind of new language, a new digital dialect, which can not only help us identify and understand new cultural trends, but that can also have a political effect. What superficially can be understood as nonsense or jokes can be a very accessible form of important political participation. Everyone who is a bit familiar with the internet and digital culture can in principle understand meme language and also potentially make memes.

If you look further into the theories of memetics, you quickly find out that memes do not only refer to internet memes but in a broader way, to elements of behaviour passed on from one individual to another by imitation (such as jokes, songs, dances or even beliefs that have been passed on over generations).

When reading into this, I could not unsee the parallels between memetic strategies and art strategies I've researched and used in the past. Tactical media, culture jamming, hacking strategies and media activism often work similar to memes. Such parallels are:

  • Working bottom-up (meaning they proceed from the bottom of a hierarchy upwards)
  • Replicating something with a twist (taking something out of a context, changing it a bit and putting it back into this context)
  • Easy generation of attention and participation
  • The aspect of humour
  • The use of public space
  • The use of an audience
  • Being part of a community

These parallels may sound a bit made up, and they certainly do not apply to all the projects of these art movements. Nevertheless, they apply strongly to my own artistic practice. This is why I want this master thesis to be closely linked to my artistic practice as well as my master project and that it answers questions that arise in my own creative process.

Connecting these two topics, 1. memes and their political dimension and 2. infiltration of public space as an art strategy, for my master project, I want to translate memetic behaviour to infiltrations of public spaces and make a guide to "memefy" life. So for the theoretical part, I want to write about these topics as well and as the third key issue, talk about the potential of bringing memes to the street and the political dimension it could open up. The possibilities of memefying life in a non-digital way as pleasant disturbances, as a political voice or even as an act of non-violent protest.

Format

An experimental analytical essay. I want to combine the classical format of a text written in an academic style with a comment section that uses internet slang.

Thesis: Introduction

~ 500 words

  • Hook the reader with a funny joke lol
  • Explanation of the research goal and background information
Research goal:
Analyse memes theoretically to receive a certain set of rules that could be applied to non-digital memes in a non-digital sphere

Thesis: Chapter 1 - Memes and their political dimension

~ 2000 words

Memes

  • Introduce the term "meme", its origin and its meaning

The perfect meme

  • What makes a meme successful?
  • Introduce L. Shifman's explanation on viral vs. memetic success

Thesis: Chapter 2 - Infiltration of public space as an art strategy

~ 2000 words

Thesis: Chapter 3 - Memefying daily life

~ 2000 words

  • Speculating on how to incorporate memes in your daily life in a non-digital way

Thesis: Conclusion

~ 500 words

something very intelligent

(yet to come)

Thesis: Glossary

(yet to come)

Thesis: References

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press

Blackmore, S. and Dawkins, R. (1999). The Meme Machine. New York: Oxford University Press

Von Gehlen, D. (2020). Meme. Berlin: Verlag Klaus Wagenbach

Raley, R. (2009). Tactical media. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press

Arkenbout, C. and Scherz, L. (2022). Critical Meme Reader II: Memetic Tacticality. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures

McCulloch, G. (2019). Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. New York: Riverhead Books

Bogost, I. (2022). The Age of Social Media Is Ending. [online] Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/11/twitter-facebook-social-media-decline/672074/ [Accessed 26 Nov. 2022]

Weibel, P. (2015). Global Activism, Art and Conflict in the 21st Century. Cambridge: MIT Press

Friesinger, G. and Grenzfurthner J. and Ballhausen, T. (2010). Urban Hacking: Cultural Jamming Strategies in the Risky Spaces of Modernity. Bielefeld: Transcript publishing

Schmidt, S.M. (2010). Hacking the City, Interventions in urban and communicative spaces. Folkwang: Edition Folkwang / Steidl

Christe, D.W.C. and Ritzen, H.H.P.M. (2021), The Manual of Modern Pataphysics. Rotterdam: Platform P

Stiegler C. and Breitenbach P. and Zorbach T. (2015). New Media Culture: Mediale Phänomene der Netzkultur. Bielefeld: transcript publishing

Nowotny J. and Reidy J. (2022). Memes, Formen und Folgen eines Internetphänomens. Bielefeld: transcript publishing

Marrs, L. and & Dingsun, T. (2022). How to Read the Internet. [online] Available at: https://otherinter.net/research/lore/how-to-read-the-internet/ [Accessed 26 Nov. 2022]