Jos de Mulbl: Difference between revisions
From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Jos de Mul - The work of art in the age of digital recombination'''
| |
|
| |
|
| We have always used media. There is no difference in prehistoric painters and media artists.
| |
|
| |
| Media = are not innocent instruments and is generally assumed that media play a crucial role in the configuration (samenstellen/beinvloeden) of the human mind and experience.
| |
|
| |
| Media = means for presenting information.
| |
|
| |
| Media are interfaces that mediate (bemiddelt) between us and the world (designation), me and you (communication), us and ourselves (self understanding).
| |
|
| |
| Aesthetic (kunstgevoel/schoonheidsleer) experience is no exception --> artistic media are interfaces that structure the imagination of the artist, the work of art itself and its reception.
| |
|
| |
| Aim of the paper:
| |
| To contribute to the reflection by analyzing the way the computer interface constitutes and structures aesthetic experience.
| |
|
| |
| Walter Benjamin:
| |
| Cult value is replaced by Exhibition value.
| |
|
| |
| De Mul: the thesis (stelling) I will defend in this paper is:
| |
| - In the age of digital recombination the database constitutes (format) the ontological model (= set of concepts) of the work of art.
| |
Latest revision as of 18:23, 16 June 2020
