User:Simon/spatial classification: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


How to utilise a "paradoxical space"? The text seems to suggest focusing on connections, relationships between subjects rather than differences? What could an associative classification system look like?
How to utilise a "paradoxical space"? The text seems to suggest focusing on connections, relationships between subjects rather than differences? What could an associative classification system look like?
Is the space of a page a suitable spatial dimension to explore in thinking about how to spatially represent dynamic, on-the-fly classification systems?
[[File:garden 01.png|500px|frameless]]
[[File:garden 02.png|500px|frameless]]<br>
Digital annotations on a pdf of Jorge Luis Borges' "The Garden of Forking Paths"
[[File:carrier bag 01.png|500px|frameless]]
[[File:carrier bag 02.png|500px|frameless]]<br>
Hand-drawn annotations on a pdf of Ursula K. Le Guin's "The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction"

Revision as of 14:17, 31 May 2019

File:Olson mapping beyond deweys boundaries.a4.pdf
Hope A Olson's text "Mapping Beyond Dewey's Boundaries" on spatial representations in classification systems brings up several thoughts. Stating that "classifications are locational systems" puts first and foremost the idea that spatial representations can be used with various effect; describing, exposing, and when used as metaphors, shifting.

1. Spatial representation of classification systems reveals the ideological conditions that form them.

2. The concepts of "paradoxical space" and "rhetorical space". Paradoxical space is described in a similar way to the paranodal; "

How to utilise a "paradoxical space"? The text seems to suggest focusing on connections, relationships between subjects rather than differences? What could an associative classification system look like?