User:Angeliki/Grad-thesis

Thesis outline

2nd draft/...

Introduction

My initial motivation to start this project was the (gender,educational,cultural) exclusion, that I have felt, in communication platforms like radio because of the exclusion in the technical knowledge of them. "The radio activists presented the work of soldering a transmitter, tuning an antenna, and producing a news program or governing a radio station to be accessible to all. Nevertheless, they were conscious of patterned gaps in their organization and volunteer base: men were more likely than women to know how to build electronics, to be excited by tinkering, and to have the know-how to teach neophytes.This troubled the activists"(Dunbar-Hester, pg. 53-54). Another reason is my experience in a previous project I had regarding what voice/speech triggers in public spaces and the power of the invisible soundscapes to create borders and social spheres. Can we realise the impact of our voice by appropriating those mediums in a way that follows up the "situation"/position (cultural, political) of a person? How embedded is the voice into those spheres? How it can become present and what (spatial, social,political) qualities can create?

Background

The voice is part of the speech that since the roots of our writing culture, heading back to oral cultures, has been an important element of the establishment of communication and the creation of political spheres and common spaces. Speech acts are some of the first actions of making decisions collectively through the embodied presence of the individual or groups. Often the speech in public takes the form of something big, like demonstrations and state announcements, being spread through a network technology, like radio and social media, or through the amplification of the sound in a public space. At the same time it can take the form of something small, like gossiping or private conversations, being spread again through platforms like radio in low frequencies (also video calls, phone calls, voice messages in a private space spread through networks), or in public/private space in small range and with the physical presence.
The freedom of voice to be spread throughout all those platforms and spaces isn't given though. The strict restrictions and rules on airwaves is an example of this fact. It is very often that we forget to use our voice as a way to communicate because of the technical difficulties of the audio to travel, the airwave restrictions and the constant use of writing in internet, mobile phones and other. But voice carries more things than the message, as Ong says. It carries our cultural, gender and bodily characteristics and gestures. The sound of voice isn't about only the message.
The voice can have a broader meaning. It can be the voice of the machine, the mechanized voice of the humans ('fake' computer generated voice), the mediated voice, the human voice, the sounds of the body. Talking about the control over voice, one can't dismiss the speech recognition technology that have being developed for AI, surveillance, other commercial or state purposes. How can this technology being used for the sake of the redefinition/appropriation/reclaiming of the voice in the creation of common/communication spaces?

Statement

The voice being present in public and the cyber/speech recognition software
How the voice and speech give presence to the public.
The multiple identity/personas and parallel presence of the voice

How the voice occupies the public space.
The occupation of public spaces through the voice.
Voice_based communication platforms as radical tools of redefining the public space.

Public speech and the electromagnetic spectrum.
Reclaiming the radio/ seeing it from other perspectives/not just a medium of technology or amateurism. Aspects of artists reusing it and opening up its full potential
How communication platforms like radio electromagnetic spectrum raise questions on limited and restricted public spaces.

The impact of reading and narrating

Structure of the text

The text can take the form of radio show, song, theatre play, script, python script, structure of phonetic rules (ref: "Speech for the stage"), structure of pocketsphinx(tool for speech recognition), audio book (uploaded in XPPL:)). The purpose is to find other ways to talk about a topic in an academic context. It is my intention the structure of the text to talk also about the topic (ref: Amy's ref).

Body

speech/voice/phonetics

First topic: The voice has a strong impact on the creation of common spaces. Sometimes that is consciously embedded in the behaviour of the people but many times the voice is controlled, isolated and used for the shake of commercial aims or the "public good". But how can we consciously use the voice as a medium for creating our own (common) soundscapes and being circulated, acting politically in all these spheres. (How the voice was used and how it is used?)

Point A: New technologies, commercial and state manipulation over voice or exclusion of it

1. Control over voice (ref: articles of Gizmodo): when the voice and speech data become material for control by using speech recognition. state terrorism
2. Restrictions/exclusions of radio pirates or music and songs outside of store/ exclusion of voices in public space (dutch law for speaker)
3. Software for speech. The manipulation oh human voice for commercial and state purposes.

Point B: The voice gives presence.

1. How voices of the voiceless becomes present in counter- communication platforms and spaces. Radio communities, micro phonic demonstrations, occupy movements. Amplify the voice./The voice circulated in communication platforms
2. The need for embodied presence (ref:"Orality and literacy"). Speech acts. Voice not only as words.
3. Speech recognition art examples

Point C: The voice creates commons.

1. The practice of gossiping (ref: text of Amy, "practices of everyday life"), phonetics, use of the voice from women as a way to create their own commons.
2. Orality and literacy (technology and oral cultures)

Systems of transfer/Tools of communication in general in relation to voice- Control and power/ Invisible frequencies and how to manipulate/use them (radio and speech recognition)

Second topic: Radio/antennas are part of an invisible infrastructure that surrounds us based on voice and sound. The knowledge on its existence and technology can give an insight on how to understand our surroundings and create commons.

Point A: Spreading the technology of radio and antennas: an approach of reclaiming the airwaves

1. Restrictions and rules over airwaves more generally--including spatial perspectives of radio.
2. Radio stations and radio art: ways to appropriate physical space and electromagnetic spectrum (ref:"Take it to the air"). Re-claiming a military/state/commercial/functional directed tool.
3. The technology of radio/frequency/antennas. The knowledge of the technology of it (exclusion-inclusion). Documentation of making antennas

Point B: Listening, scanning throughout frequencies (and other sources) and understanding my surroundings.

1. Scanning through weird sounds, broadcasters, official frequencies. Documentation of scanning (sounds and text). Mapping the frequencies through 'live' speech recognition.

Point C: Radio as a voice communication platform.

1. Radio amateurs, artists, pirate radios. Documentation of interviews with pirates. Using it from a different perspective. Radio amateurs-> gendered space. Communication platform of transeiving (Receiving and transmitting as one act/structural coupling. ref:"radio in the chiasme, Tetsuo Kogawa"). The voice being spread as a frequency.

leave a trace: politics of presence

Third topic: The voice is invisible, but can exist in multiple spaces at the same time. It can be physical or digital/"parallelial"

Point A: The spatial perspectives of sound and voice/the physical dimensions of it./Radio and voice in space: Being present in the space and radio at the same time. Multiple voices (presence and absence).

1. Combination of voice and radio (two previous): Public space and pirate radios.
2. The parallel presence of it. Presence means also absence, means also receiving and listening. Akio Suzuki

Point B: Walking (ref:"Walking and mapping"), mapping, tracing, tracking, listening, murmuring(the thickening of space through the invisible, audible). The private soundscapes created by it.

1. Streaming
2. Being here now and elsewhere. "Heidegger, in Being and Time and elsewhere,", "To the extent that it always relates us to the absent other, the telephone"(Telephone Book, Ronell)

Conclusion

The transition of the voice

1st draft/18 October

Introduction

Background

The voice is part of the speech that since the roots of our writing culture, heading back to oral cultures, has been an important element of the establishment of communication and the creation of political spheres and common spaces. Speech acts are some of the first actions of making decisions collectively through the embodied presence of the individual or groups. Often the speech in public takes the form of something big, like demonstrations and state announcements, being spread through a network technology, like radio and social media, or through the amplification of the sound in a public space. At the same time it can take the form of something small, like gossiping or private conversations, being spread again through platforms like radio in low frequencies, or in public/private space in small range and with the physical presence. [Lotte:is this always with pyshical presence, for example phone calls or video calls can be done from their own space?]
The freedom of voice to be spread throughout all those platforms and spaces isn't given though. The strict restrictions and rules on airwaves is an example of this fact. It is very often that we forget to use our voice as a way to communicate because of the technical difficulties of the audio to travel, the airwave restrictions and the constant use of writing in internet, mobile phones and other. But voice carries more things than the message, as Ong says. It carries our cultural, gender and bodily characteristics and gestures. The sound of voice isn't about only the message.
The voice can have a broader meaning. It can be the voice of the machine, the mechanized voice of the humans, the mediated voice, the human voice, the sounds of the body. Talking about the control over voice, one can't dismiss the speech recognition technology that have being developed for AI, surveillance, other commercial or state purposes. [Lotte:How about using the 'fake' computer generated voice etc.?] How can this technology being used for the sake of the reposition of the voice in the creation of common/communication spaces? [Lotte:Is this going back to your experiments again? What does resposition mean ins this context?]

Statement

The voice being present in public and the
The impact of reading and narrating
Reclaiming the radio/ seeing it from other perspectives/not just a medium of technology or amateurism. Aspects of artists reusing it and opening up its full potential
How the voice occupies the public space. [Lotte: I think the one under this line is maybe more relevant / has more content?]
The occupation of public spaces through the voice.
Voice_based communication platforms as radical tools of redefining the public space. [Lotte: Also this one feels very similar, almost like its getting more defined :) ]
Public speech and the electromagnetic spectrum.
How communication platforms like radio electromagnetic spectrum raise questions on limited and restricted public spaces.
How the voice and speech give presence to the public.

Structure of the text

The text can take the form of radio show, song, theatre play, script, python script, structure of phonetic rules (ref: "Speech for the stage"), structure of pocketsphinx. The purpose is to find other ways to talk about a topic in an academic context. It is my intention the structure of the text to talk also about the topic. [ I LIKE THIS ]

Motivation

(Gender) exclusion in communication platforms like radio because of the exclusion in the technical knowledge of them. Redefining those mediums by appropriate them in a way that follows up the "situation"/position (cultural, political) of that person. [ Lotte: This already feels more spefic, maybe also use this in the background ? Very clear reason etc, maybe the rest should derive from that? ]

Body

Invisible frequencies and how to manipulate/use them

First topic: Radio/antennas are part of an invisible infrastructure that surrounds us. The knowledge on its existence and technology can give an insight on how to understand our surroundings and create commons.
Point A: Spreading the technology of radio and antennas: an approach of reclaiming the airwaves

1. Restrictions and rules over airwaves.
2. Radio stations and radio art: ways to appropriate physical space and electromagnetic spectrum (ref:"Take it to the air"). Re-claiming a military/state/commercial/functional directed tool.
3. The technology of radio/frequency/antennas. The knowledge of the technology of it (exclusion-inclusion). Documentation of making antennas

Point B: Listening, scanning throughout frequencies (and other sources) and understanding my surroundings.

1. Scanning through weird sounds, broadcasters, official frequencies. Documentation of scanning (sounds and text). Mapping the frequencies through 'live' speech recognition.

Point C: Radio as a voice communication platform.

1. Radio amateurs, artists, pirate radios. Documentation of interviews with pirates. Using it from a different perspective. Radio amateurs-> gendered space. Communication platform of transeiving (Receiving and transmitting as one act/structural coupling). The voice being spread as a frequency.

speech/voice/phonetics

Second topic: The voice has a strong impact on the creation of common spaces. Sometimes that is consciously embedded in the behaviour of the people but many times the voice is controlled, isolated and used for the shake of commercial aims or the "public good". But how can we consciously use the voice as a medium for creating our own (common) soundscapes and being circulated, acting politically in all these spheres.
Point A: The voice gives presence.

1. How voices of the voiceless becomes present in counter- communication platforms. Radio communities, micro phonic demonstrations, occupy movements. Amplify the voice.
2. The need for embodied presence (ref:"Orality and literacy"). Speech acts. Voice not only as words.

Point B: New technologies, commercial and state manipulation over voice or exclusion of it

1. Control over voice (ref: articles of Gizmodo): when the voice and speech data become material for control by using speech recognition.
2. Restrictions/exclusions of radio or music and songs outside of stores
3. Software for speech. The manipulation oh human voice for commercial and state purposes.

Point C: The voice creates commons.

1. The practice of gossiping (ref: text of Amy, "practices of everyday life"), phonetics, use of the voice from women as a way to create their own commons.
2. The voice circulated in communication platforms
3. Orality and literacy (technology and oral cultures)

leave a trace: politics of presence

Third topic: The voice is invisible, but can exist in multiple spaces at the same time. It can be physical or digital
Point A: The spatial perspectives of sound and voice/the physical dimensions of it. Point B: Radio and voice in space: Being present in the space and radio at the same time. Multiple voices (presence and absence).

1. Combination of voice and radio (two previous): Public space and pirate radios.
2. The parallel presence of it. Presence means also absence, means also receiving and listening. Akio Suzuki

Point C: Walking (ref:"Walking and mapping"), mapping, tracing, tracking, listening, murmuring. The private soundscapes created by it.

[ Lotte: Why not use speech first in body ? For me that's a more logical structure. Like you said in your introduction; first there was voice. Also i feel like some thing might be a bit overlapping?]

Conclusion

Revisions:
14/10/2018