User:Alice/Thesis outline: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "1. Topic: The reinterpretation of food culture through technology. 2. Argument: Tech culture is appropriating food culture and stripping it of its basic values.(too harsh?) 3/...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Introduction=== | ===Introduction=== | ||
- Background - I've always been accustomed to food being considered either a trivial subject (food=sustenance or food=entertainment), or extremely elitist (fine dining). The fact that food related discussions and events are increasingly associated with tech culture and organized in hackerspaces is striking to me, and I would like to critically reflect on this phenomenon. | - Background - | ||
I've always been accustomed to food being considered either a trivial subject (food=sustenance or food=entertainment), or extremely elitist (fine dining). The fact that food related discussions and events are increasingly associated with tech culture and organized in hackerspaces is striking to me, and I would like to critically reflect on this phenomenon. | |||
- Thesis statement | - Thesis statement | ||
Tech culture is appropriating food culture, stripping it of its basic values, using its terms... The past struggles associated with the oppression of women forced into domestic labour are often overlooked, and instead the focus is on playful experimentation and a display of a skillset. | Tech culture is appropriating food culture, stripping it of its basic values, using its terms... The past struggles associated with the oppression of women forced into domestic labour are often overlooked, and instead the focus is on playful experimentation and a display of a skillset. | ||
The fact that more attention is being given to reflections on food is a positive step forward, but how critical are the current approaches? | The fact that more attention is being given to reflections on food is a positive step forward, but how critical are the current approaches? | ||
Line 13: | Line 17: | ||
First topic | First topic | ||
Reflection on the role of cooking in our lives and how it has changed in time | Reflection on the role of cooking in our lives and how it has changed in time | ||
'''Point A:''' Women have always been pushed towards domestic work, deemed too unimportant for men | |||
* Women's role in the family is secondary in terms of power structure | |||
* women's liberation heavily focused on wages for housework | |||
''' | |||
Point B:''' Gender roles in the production of food are very defined | |||
* Cooking as caregiving, for health benefits - identified more with women | |||
* Cooking as entertainment, skill display - men | |||
''' | |||
Point C:''' Cooking as political act | |||
* Less of a consumer, more involved in the process of production | |||
* Cooking as labour, taken over by food industry | |||
Second topic | Second topic | ||
A bridge between cooking and programming | A bridge between cooking and programming | ||
Point A: The recipe is often used as metaphor for computer programs | |||
'''Point A:''' The recipe is often used as metaphor for computer programs | |||
* Appropriated terminology | |||
* Explaining one through the other, sometimes in a patronizing way | |||
'''Point B:''' Mutual contributions from FLOSS culture and food culture | |||
* Community aspect is beneficial for both and can be used as a starting point | |||
* Collaborative cooking/programming | |||
* Reflecting on histories/methods/tools/biases/prior assumptions | |||
Third topic | Third topic | ||
Imagining a concept for mindful cooking experiments | Imagining a concept for mindful cooking experiments | ||
'''Point A:''' Food hacking events | |||
* Background, notable members | |||
* How they work/how can they be improved | |||
'''Point B:''' Tech and cooking can work together in harmony | |||
* Positive examples | |||
* Positive examples | |||
===Conclusion=== | ===Conclusion=== |
Revision as of 18:18, 9 October 2018
1. Topic: The reinterpretation of food culture through technology. 2. Argument: Tech culture is appropriating food culture and stripping it of its basic values.(too harsh?) 3/4 Food related topics are becoming more prevalent in technology discussions. This association could be a representation of tech culture appropriating food culture, stripping it of its basic values and putting less emphasis on the past struggles associated with the oppression of women forced into domestic labour, and the community aspects related to collective memory and cooking, and more on technical experimentation. In my view, there is a need to critically reimagine food in technology to include all aspects, be more self aware and less elitist.
Introduction
- Background -
I've always been accustomed to food being considered either a trivial subject (food=sustenance or food=entertainment), or extremely elitist (fine dining). The fact that food related discussions and events are increasingly associated with tech culture and organized in hackerspaces is striking to me, and I would like to critically reflect on this phenomenon.
- Thesis statement
Tech culture is appropriating food culture, stripping it of its basic values, using its terms... The past struggles associated with the oppression of women forced into domestic labour are often overlooked, and instead the focus is on playful experimentation and a display of a skillset. The fact that more attention is being given to reflections on food is a positive step forward, but how critical are the current approaches?
Body
First topic
Reflection on the role of cooking in our lives and how it has changed in time
Point A: Women have always been pushed towards domestic work, deemed too unimportant for men
* Women's role in the family is secondary in terms of power structure
* women's liberation heavily focused on wages for housework Point B: Gender roles in the production of food are very defined
* Cooking as caregiving, for health benefits - identified more with women
* Cooking as entertainment, skill display - men Point C: Cooking as political act
* Less of a consumer, more involved in the process of production
* Cooking as labour, taken over by food industry
Second topic
A bridge between cooking and programming
Point A: The recipe is often used as metaphor for computer programs
* Appropriated terminology
* Explaining one through the other, sometimes in a patronizing way
Point B: Mutual contributions from FLOSS culture and food culture
* Community aspect is beneficial for both and can be used as a starting point
* Collaborative cooking/programming
* Reflecting on histories/methods/tools/biases/prior assumptions
Third topic
Imagining a concept for mindful cooking experiments
Point A: Food hacking events
* Background, notable members
* How they work/how can they be improved
Point B: Tech and cooking can work together in harmony
* Positive examples
* Positive examples