User:Tash/grad thesis outline1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* (Self-)censorship, cultural regulation and revisionism (“New media, Old wounds”) | * (Self-)censorship, cultural regulation and revisionism (“New media, Old wounds”) | ||
* Meme culture as a mode of civic engagement, a way of imaging dissent | * Meme culture as a mode of civic engagement, a way of imaging dissent | ||
* Archiving as an active political practice (and post-colonial tool?) | * Archiving (remembering) as an active political practice (and post-colonial tool?) | ||
* Alternative ways of sharing knowledge, and their social aspects (“We publish to find comrades!”) | * Alternative ways of sharing knowledge, and their social aspects (“We publish to find comrades!”) | ||
* Weaponization of the internet, propaganda wars in the comments section | * Weaponization of the internet, propaganda wars in the comments section | ||
==== | ==== Structure: ==== | ||
I. Introduction | |||
Background: As a publisher, I have always been interested in the way netizenship informs citizenship and vice versa. As an Indonesian, recent events in Indonesian politics (like the 2016 prosecution of progressive Jakarta governor Ahok on so-called ‘blasphemy’ charges) lead me to believe that there is a rising problem of (self-)censorship in our country, and an urgent need for alternative platforms and modes of discourse. At the same time, I see how engaged young Indonesians are with social media and meme culture, often using them to as forms of political participation. Following this, I’m fascinated by the participatory potential of memetic media, and want to explore how it could be used as a democratic tool in present-day Indonesia.
| |||
Thesis Statement: While in Indonesia today – a young republic in which free speech is still limited – social media has had generally positive effects on the democratic process, deliberate digital activism (including the likes of critical memetics, progressive propaganda, trolling and culture jamming) is needed to turn these spaces of reaction into meaningful platforms for political discourse. | |||
II. Body | |||
First Topic: The roles of mainstream vs alternative media in Indonesia
| |||
Point A: Historically, mainstream Indonesian media industries (newspapers, books and film) do little to challenge existing social and political hegemonies. | |||
e.g. film as propaganda and psywar | |||
e.g. omissions and erasures of events from collective memory, like the 1965 genocide | |||
e.g. new forms of censorship: Anti Pornography law, blasphemy law, defamation law | |||
Point B: The emergence of pop culture and screen culture represented a new kind of media by the people, for the people. | |||
e.g. Web 2.0. and social media flourished in post-colonial contexts like Indonesia, Phillippines etc. allowing anonymity, expression, debate (freedom of speech) | |||
e.g. Internet as a way of creating new networks of people (freedom of connection), reference Hito Steyerl’s In Defense of the Poor Image and Balaguer & Cramer’s Moral of the Xerox | |||
Second Topic: Social media as a democratic tool | |||
Point A: New media has had a pivotal role in recent political processes around the world. | |||
e.g. The use of social media campaigns during recent presidential elections (Indonesia 2014). | |||
Point B: Memes and meme culture has become a fundamental new mode of civic engagement for Indonesian citizens. | |||
e.g. The use of political memes during the recent corruption scandal of government official, Setya Novanto | |||
e.g. Humour as a mechanism by which to make politics accessible to the masses | |||
Third Topic: Dissecting the counterarguments: the weaponization of the internet | |||
Point A: Social and memetic media are sometimes dismissed as trivial, empty forms of political participation. | |||
e.g. they are only reactive, only create more polarisation | |||
e.g. they are easily exploited by special interest groups, weaponized by political parties | |||
Point B: How (self)-censorship manifests online. | |||
e.g. social pressure from the Muslim majority, making certain subjects taboo | |||
Point C: Artists, activists and publishers can intervene in social media’s mechanisms to challenge existing modes of engagement. | |||
e.g. comment section activism? | |||
e.g. creating new hooks / platforms for discussion? | |||
III. Conclusion | |||
For a country whose mainstream media is becoming more and more sensitive to dissent, meme culture – with its polyvocality, and capacity for both critique and humor – represents a valuable space for young Indonesians to engage and experiment with alternative political discourse. |
Revision as of 19:05, 7 October 2018
Thesis Outline Draft 1
Format:
2) An analytical essay exploring related artistic, theoretical, historical and critical issues and practices that inform your practice, without necessarily referring to your work directly.
- plus annotations written from a personal point of view, to situate the research within my own context and practice
Key topics:
- Social & networked media as democratic or emancipatory tools
- Freedom of speech / freedom of connection / freedom of religion
- The rise of alternative media / pop culture and its role in contemporary nation-building
- (Self-)censorship, cultural regulation and revisionism (“New media, Old wounds”)
- Meme culture as a mode of civic engagement, a way of imaging dissent
- Archiving (remembering) as an active political practice (and post-colonial tool?)
- Alternative ways of sharing knowledge, and their social aspects (“We publish to find comrades!”)
- Weaponization of the internet, propaganda wars in the comments section
Structure:
I. Introduction Background: As a publisher, I have always been interested in the way netizenship informs citizenship and vice versa. As an Indonesian, recent events in Indonesian politics (like the 2016 prosecution of progressive Jakarta governor Ahok on so-called ‘blasphemy’ charges) lead me to believe that there is a rising problem of (self-)censorship in our country, and an urgent need for alternative platforms and modes of discourse. At the same time, I see how engaged young Indonesians are with social media and meme culture, often using them to as forms of political participation. Following this, I’m fascinated by the participatory potential of memetic media, and want to explore how it could be used as a democratic tool in present-day Indonesia. Thesis Statement: While in Indonesia today – a young republic in which free speech is still limited – social media has had generally positive effects on the democratic process, deliberate digital activism (including the likes of critical memetics, progressive propaganda, trolling and culture jamming) is needed to turn these spaces of reaction into meaningful platforms for political discourse.
II. Body First Topic: The roles of mainstream vs alternative media in Indonesia Point A: Historically, mainstream Indonesian media industries (newspapers, books and film) do little to challenge existing social and political hegemonies. e.g. film as propaganda and psywar e.g. omissions and erasures of events from collective memory, like the 1965 genocide e.g. new forms of censorship: Anti Pornography law, blasphemy law, defamation law
Point B: The emergence of pop culture and screen culture represented a new kind of media by the people, for the people. e.g. Web 2.0. and social media flourished in post-colonial contexts like Indonesia, Phillippines etc. allowing anonymity, expression, debate (freedom of speech) e.g. Internet as a way of creating new networks of people (freedom of connection), reference Hito Steyerl’s In Defense of the Poor Image and Balaguer & Cramer’s Moral of the Xerox
Second Topic: Social media as a democratic tool Point A: New media has had a pivotal role in recent political processes around the world. e.g. The use of social media campaigns during recent presidential elections (Indonesia 2014).
Point B: Memes and meme culture has become a fundamental new mode of civic engagement for Indonesian citizens. e.g. The use of political memes during the recent corruption scandal of government official, Setya Novanto e.g. Humour as a mechanism by which to make politics accessible to the masses
Third Topic: Dissecting the counterarguments: the weaponization of the internet Point A: Social and memetic media are sometimes dismissed as trivial, empty forms of political participation. e.g. they are only reactive, only create more polarisation e.g. they are easily exploited by special interest groups, weaponized by political parties
Point B: How (self)-censorship manifests online. e.g. social pressure from the Muslim majority, making certain subjects taboo
Point C: Artists, activists and publishers can intervene in social media’s mechanisms to challenge existing modes of engagement. e.g. comment section activism? e.g. creating new hooks / platforms for discussion?
III. Conclusion
For a country whose mainstream media is becoming more and more sensitive to dissent, meme culture – with its polyvocality, and capacity for both critique and humor – represents a valuable space for young Indonesians to engage and experiment with alternative political discourse.