User:Angeliki/Research writing: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
Line 72: Line 72:


https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQuHs6xJWF5yEz3vcgM1RcS2mSYI71sI35NmIzSK20fNV29mx-D
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQuHs6xJWF5yEz3vcgM1RcS2mSYI71sI35NmIzSK20fNV29mx-D
Some formats: interviews


=== Questions ===
=== Questions ===

Revision as of 11:21, 4 October 2018

"it is difficult to imagine how someone researching the equipment and technical skills necessary to produce her own broadcasts would fail to come across the information that what she is trying to do is probably illegal" John Anderson, presentation at Southern Illinois University, February 25, 2008.

Project proposal

What do you want to make?
How do you plan to make it?
What is your timetable?
Why do you want to make it?
Who can help you and how?
Who can help you and how?
Relation to a larger context


Small ideas:

-The text circulated in the digital sphere (social media, news etc) read/broadcasted (espeak?people participated to create phonemes?) live to participants while walking in the city. Choosing spots that have an importance (historical, political, surveillance spots etc) in relevance to my documentation and research.
-In reverse: sounds/voices/speeches of the electromagnetic-online realm being transcribed to a text that is shared to the public.
-local networks and reading rooms
-Taking my research text into the archival material (texts, transcriptions, voices, speeches) being compared

An attempt to:
Walking, parallel actions. Setting up local networks of writing and reading and working with programming. Reading rooms. Deconstruct research methodologies by collaborating together in the physical space while being in the cyber. Bringing conflictuous contexts together. How the language is an error, how projects with the language become a tool for communication and interrogation as a group, collective. Collaborating and communicating/antennas hardware. Hack the available medium into each instance/context I will be involved. Writing abstracts mostly and use them as a first raw material to experiment with. Working with software that seems related even if it looks irrelevant, like antennas software, speech recognition, local networks, python/nltk?, pirate libraries. While writing and prototyping I intend to interact with public spheres. I would like to try interact with contexts outside of my known area, like the art-initiatives in Philippines (already interacting) and Greece/Romania or local groups here and communities online.

The steps I want to follow:

-prototyping with radio/antennas and webcast/broadcast and embroidered antennas
-prototyping with mapping and lines
-prototyping with speech recognition
-prototyping with synopsis
-Set-up a platform to document prototyping, writing, experiments in public. People can contribute to that. Comminication friction. leave a trace. Establish temporary platforms
-documenting events, public spaces (where the electromagnetic, online sphere and speeches appear, surveillance spots, How the spaces are mediated and use tracking devices or software for communication)
-searching archives like city archive, Kootwijk history, radio communities
-search for technologies that are already made for surveillance and are related to speech recognition in the city
-Collect bibliography
-Setting up questions
-Reading- Making abstracts


The reason I am doing that:
I want to dive into the in between space of media and physical landscapes. Regarding the expanses of public spheres in diverse spaces interesting networks are created that can stay active by circulating the knowledge produced by the people being involved. Knowledge is circulated also through the speech and the voice of people in internet, electromagnetic spheres, communication platforms in general and physical spaces. The small conversations/murmurings/gossiping spread around those communication platforms are making a public space, that differs from the public access in spaces as Saskia Sassen mentions and the big political, religion, institutional speeches dominating the public spaces. Seeing the documentation of these voices/sounds/speeches as an archive of collective memory, this material could be placed together on a way that proposes alternative of perceiving ourselves individually and collectively into those landscapes. It can also propose other ways of "publicness". As Ong observed in Orality and Literacy, the condition for a democratic social dialogue in oral cultures was the presence of people in the space and their oral speech and thus after many discussions and performative behaviors they would reach to a decision together or they would just share their individual identities and stories. At the same time peoples voices are used for the creation of phonemes that would help the "machine" to understand, recognize and imitate human voices, conversations. How political decisions affect those spheres? I can imagine living in the world of voices.


Who could help me:
XPUB gang, Clara,Roel,...

Previously:
I interrogated the language structure by bringing together people from different backgrounds and contexts to read, listen and write texts in a playful way that reveals layers and structures of the language. At the same time I keep being interested in how the tool becomes the output and reverse. I worked with collective writing, reading, speech recognition, collective annotation, collective reading and interacted with digital communities to construct the software. My way of working looks like an alien creature but weirdly make sense; I combine different unrelated (technically and conceptually) software with the purpose to follow the concept.

Larger context:
urban tactical media, hacktivism, occupy movements, radio amateurs, text as a social space, architecture and media, radio public sphere, local to global, vernacular, paratext, misreading, platforms, phonemes, local networks, temporality, databases and GPS/sql More specific:

radio art, electromagnetic public sphere, platforms of communication and how to contest them, broadcasting and webcasting
mapping tools, walking practices
voice as a tool, speech recognition, transcriptions, voice in communication platforms
in relation to the above interventions of text


Feedback:
communicative language very academic


Approaching writing

I would like to keep writing abstracts, short essays. Writing texts to be merged with writing scripts and scores, until the point where the format of the text is deconstructed and proposes other ways of reading and writing the thesis. I would like to approach the text as a social space open to the public, like what we did the last trimester with reading a text in the tunnel, while walking.

Example of "blurry" writing:

"No_vowels poem"

#Takes out the vowels of a text
import sys
from sys import stdin

l=list('aeiou')
# original = input('give me the poem ')
original = stdin.read()

if len(original) > 0:
    word= original.lower()
    s=list(word)
    new_word=[]
    for i in s:
    	# or if i not in l
        if not i in l: 
           new_word.append(i)
    print (''.join(new_word))
else:
    print ('empty')
Jack tells Jill Jill tells Jack Jack wants Jill Jill wants Jack a perfect contract Jill wants Jack to want Jill to want Jacks want ofher want for his want of her want of Jacks want that Jill wants Jack to want Jill to want Jacks want of her want for his want of her to want Jack to want
 jck tlls jll jll tlls jck jck wnts jll jll wnts jck  prfct cntrct jll wnts jck t wnt jll t wnt jcks wnt fhr wnt fr hs wnt f hr wnt f jcks wnt tht jll wnts jck t wnt jll t wnt jcks wnt f hr wnt fr hs wnt f hr t wnt jck t wnt
From "Knots", R.D.Laing


walking_the_text

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQuHs6xJWF5yEz3vcgM1RcS2mSYI71sI35NmIzSK20fNV29mx-D

Some formats: interviews

Questions

  • How is the media sphere related to public spaces? How they do construct the space?
  • What that reveals for the space (either physical or digital) and our surroundings?
  • How the commons are related to that and how can be influenced by that?
  • How the tools provide another perspective and way of research or communicating?
  • How walking and including the presence of our body into this media occupied public space reveals hidden meanings and perspectives?
  • How the art and architecture opens up to these possibilities that this technical knowledge of programming, media provides? How can this still be conceptual, poetic? How can this include the "I" and the "we"? How and why to make things public?
  • Is it object, is it an endless process, is it an action?

Steve's questions:

  • What material from the 'text on method' you wrote last trimester could be useful for the proposal? ...Abstracts, descriptions of projects in process, collective writing...
  • What possibilities are open to you? ...tools, places/networks I would interact with, workshops of writing...

(make a list of whys, questions, silly or not, eternal, going closer to the core)

Mood

Being practical/mechanical/physical and at the same time conceptual/intuitive

-----the core and the surroundings-----

Being an insect having or creating antennas. Being in place and being absent. Being expert to my tools and mechanisms. The non-art Hack the media surrounding us, use them as artistic tools (antennas, locative/in-situ? installation in between spaces, digital, physical, cultural) layers of sharing

Abstracts & Synopsis

References

  • Auge, M., 2009. Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity, 2 edition. ed. Verso, London ; New York.
  • Augoyard, J.-F., Torgue, H., 2006. Sonic Experience: A Guide to Everyday Sounds. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal ; Ithaca.
  • Bassett, C., n.d. ‘How Many Movements?’ [WWW Document]. Online Open. URL https://www.onlineopen.org/how-many-movements (accessed 8.18.18).
  • Berger, J., 2008. Ways of Seeing, 01 edition. ed. Penguin Classics, London.
  • Calle, S., 2012. Sophie Calle: The Address Book. Siglio, Los Angeles.
  • Calle, S., Baudrillard, J., 1988. Suite Venitienne/Please Follow Me. Bay Pr, Seattle.
  • Chantal Mouffe, n.d. Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism.
  • Deutsche, R., 1998. Evictions: Art and Spatial Politics, New Ed edition. ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Feminist Art of Failure, Ewa Partum and the Weak Avant-Garde | Majewska | Widok. Teorie i praktyki kultury wizualnej [WWW Document], n.d. URL http://pismowidok.org/index.php/one/article/view/370/918 (accessed 8.26.18).
  • Galloway, A.R., 2004. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Genette, G., 2010. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, NY, USA.
  • Gilbert Simondon, 2012. ON TECHNO-AESTHETICS. PARRHESIA 14, 1–8.
  • Habsburg, F. von, Cardiff, J., 2006. Janet Cardiff: The Walk Book, Har/Com edition. ed. Cornerhouse Publications, Köln.
  • Hand, B., 1999. Public Art Indoors: Sound and Art in Public Spaces. Circa 42–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/25563399
  • Harold, B., n.d. A Map of Misreading.
  • Jane Rendell, 1999. Introduction: ‘Gender, Space,’ in: Borden, I., Penner, B., Rendell, J. (Eds.), Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. Routledge, London ; New York, pp. 225–239.
  • Joseph-Hunter, G., 2009. Transmission Arts: The Air That Surrounds Us. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art 31, 34–40.
  • Kamal, S., 2007. Development On-Air: Women’s Radio Production in Afghanistan. Gender and Development 15, 399–411.
  • Kanouse, S., 2011. Take It to the Air: Radio as Public Art. Art Journal 70, 86–99.
  • Kwon, M., 2004. One Place after Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity, 1st edition. ed. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Latour, B., Weibel, P. (Eds.), 2005. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, First edition. ed. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. : Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Manovich, L., 2006. The Poetics of Augmented Space. Visual Communication - VIS COMMUN 5, 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357206065527
  • Milutis, J., 2006. Ether: The Nothing That Connects Everything, 1 edition. ed. Univ Of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  • Naughton, T., 1996. Community Radio: A Voice for the Voiceless. Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity 12–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/4066258
  • Noy, I., 2017. Emergency Noises: Sound Art and Gender, New edition edition. ed. Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, New York.
  • O`rourke, K., 2013. Walking and Mapping: Artists as Cartographers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Oliver Marchart, 2011. Art, Space and the Public Sphere(s). archive public.
  • Ouzounian, G., 2008. Sound art and spatial practices : situating sound installation art since 1958. UC San Diego.
  • Ouzounian, G., n.d. Visualizing Acoustic Space: The Story of Poème électronique. Revue Circuit.
  • Pauline Oliveros, 2011. Sonic Meditations, in: AUSTIN, L., KAHN, D., Gurusinghe, N. (Eds.), Source: Music of the Avant-Garde, 1966–1973. University of California Press, pp. 342–346.
  • Phillips, P.C., 2004. In This Issue: Unsettled Imaginations. Art Journal 63, 3–3. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134500
  • Place, Space and Purpose [WWW Document], n.d. . Ibraaz. URL https://www.ibraaz.org/interviews/168 (accessed 8.28.18).
  • Saskia Sassen, 2012. The Shifting Meaning of the Urban Condition, in: Panos Kouros, Elpida Karaba (Eds.), Archive Public. Performing Archives in Public Art, Topical Interpositions. Cube Art Editions, pp. 185–199.
  • Schraffenberger, H., Heide, E. van der, 2014. Everything Augmented: On the Real in Augmented Reality. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts 6, 17–29.
  • Scott Ruston, 2014. Location- Based Narrative, in: Ryan, M.-L., Emerson, L., Robertson, B.J. (Eds.), The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 127–129.
  • Self-* properties through gossiping, n.d.
  • Slouka, M., 1999. Listening for silence. Harper’s Magazine.
  • Smith, N., 2005. The Politics of Public Space, 1 edition. ed. Routledge, New York.
  • The Murmuring of the Artistic Multitude, n.d.
  • Tonkiss, F., 2003. Aural postcards: sound, memory and the city, in: Bull, M., Back, L. (Eds.), The Auditory Culture Reader. Berg Publishers, Oxford, pp. 303–310.
  • Tucker, 2017. Organize Your Own Temporality by Rasheedah Phillips. Organize Your Own.
  • Turkle, S., 2016. Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age, Reprint edition. ed. Penguin Books, New York.
  • U B U W E B :: Radio Radio [WWW Document], n.d. URL http://www.ubu.com/sound/radio_radio/ (accessed 9.17.18).
  • van der Heide, E., 2013. Radioscape: Into Electromagnetic Space. Leonardo Music Journal 23, 15–16. https://doi.org/10.1162/LMJ_a_00143
  • Weiss, A.S., 1995. Phantasmic Radio. Duke University Press Books, Durham, N.C.
  • Wendy, C., n.d. Control and freedom.


Projects

Public Broadcast Cart is a shopping cart outfitted with a dynamic microphone, a mixer, an amplifier, six speakers, a miniFM transmitter and a laptop with a wireless card. The audio captured by the microphone on the cart is fed through the mixer to three different broadcast sources.

EMF Sensing and Fractal Antennas. The wearable detectors that are produced at the workshop can be used in a number of ways - as an open-source tool to explore the city’s invisible landscape, as an audiovisual performance interface or as a way to collect EMF data that can afterwards be used for further analysis and experiments (e.g. vizualisation or signification).

Her Long Black Hair (Janet Cardiff, 2004) Her Long Black Hair takes each listener on a winding, mysterious journey through Central Park’s 19th-century pathways, retracing the footsteps of an enigmatic dark-haired woman.

Pak Sheung Chuen Coincidence Measured by Body/ Andrew Maerkle ()


Lam Siu-wing, Flaneur 11 Homeward Bound (2013)