MELK camera tests: Difference between revisions
Sal Miranda (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Sal Miranda (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
The top left footage is shot with a handheld Samsung phone <div> | The top left footage is shot with a handheld Samsung phone <div> | ||
The top right footage is shot with a | The top right footage is shot with a [[Lasercut Rollieflex]] body<div> | ||
The bottom footage is shot with a Sony HVR Z7E on a figrig<div> | The bottom footage is shot with a Sony HVR Z7E on a figrig<div> | ||
Note: footage shot with a Canon 5D Mark II on a figrig is curropted and unviewable<div> | Note: footage shot with a Canon 5D Mark II on a figrig is curropted and unviewable<div> | ||
{{vimeo|246142446}} | {{vimeo|246142446}} | ||
Revision as of 12:30, 7 December 2017
Test shots to:
- examine how different camera bodies impact the footage we take
- examine physical experience of shooting with different bodies
- examine camera stability with different cameras/equipment
Procedure:
A path was choreographed for the actor to follow. All the footage uses a Samsung phone to record, physically attached to the camera bodies listed below. This allows the only variable in the process of filming to be the physical body/equipment in affecting the shot, rather than the stabilizing/qualitative aspects that form part of each body's recording mechanism.
The top left footage is shot with a handheld Samsung phone
The top right footage is shot with a Lasercut Rollieflex body
The bottom footage is shot with a Sony HVR Z7E on a figrig
Note: footage shot with a Canon 5D Mark II on a figrig is curropted and unviewable