User:Eastwood/research writing: Difference between revisions
(→2017) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=== Essay Research === | === Essay Research === | ||
https://pad.bleu255.com/p/rwrm_notes_06-01-17 | https://pad.bleu255.com/p/rwrm_notes_06-01-17 | ||
started of with passports and identity | |||
evolved into idea of national identity, mobility | |||
institutionalised | |||
Passports, indentity which evolved into the idea of national identity, mobility, | |||
need to find history of passports | |||
phylosophy of identity. movement through World of the family. | |||
Political environment. | |||
need to look at a personal point of view | |||
look at family and their movement | |||
what information is needed | |||
case study on 'nationally diverse' family | |||
where do you come from? | |||
is it relevant to make that destinction? | |||
Trump Tolling | |||
http://everysecondcounts.eu/ | |||
Taiye Selasi: Don't ask where I'm from, ask where I'm a local | |||
https://www.ted.com/talks/taiye_selasi_don_t_ask_where_i_m_from_ask_where_i_m_a_local?utm_source=tedcomshare&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=tedspread | |||
dna test momondo | |||
https://www.momondo.nl/letsopenourworld/ | |||
Is your DNA a more genuine distinction of your "nationalities". Is ethnicity related to nationality. Is culture related to nationality? | |||
Ethnocentrism | |||
Overview Effect - seeing the world from outer space | |||
https://vimeo.com/55073825 | |||
The Space Between Us | |||
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3922818/ | |||
Why a passport identity exists? which are the reasons they exists? do they identify us? | |||
Can you look at yourself / your personality and find something 'typically' Australian, South African, Belgian? | |||
How family culture can get into your identity? | |||
Italian travelled to Argentina. He felt at home there because of similar culture (many Italians there) | |||
What defines a culture? | |||
Language | |||
How does language shape cultural identity? | |||
It's also a specific tool. In some countries it's easier to explain food, weather, nature, technology | |||
What was the reason we started having passports? | |||
History of passports | |||
History of the visa - started in 1958 | |||
Costs of visas | |||
Compare difficulties / process of getting a visa | |||
Look into reasons why you do / do not need a visa | |||
Poland doesn't need a visa to China because they think Poland is still communistic | |||
Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND) | |||
https://ind.nl | |||
== 2016 == | == 2016 == |
Revision as of 17:05, 6 February 2017
2017
Essay Research
https://pad.bleu255.com/p/rwrm_notes_06-01-17
started of with passports and identity evolved into idea of national identity, mobility institutionalised
Passports, indentity which evolved into the idea of national identity, mobility,
need to find history of passports phylosophy of identity. movement through World of the family. Political environment.
need to look at a personal point of view look at family and their movement
what information is needed case study on 'nationally diverse' family
where do you come from? is it relevant to make that destinction?
Trump Tolling http://everysecondcounts.eu/
Taiye Selasi: Don't ask where I'm from, ask where I'm a local https://www.ted.com/talks/taiye_selasi_don_t_ask_where_i_m_from_ask_where_i_m_a_local?utm_source=tedcomshare&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=tedspread
dna test momondo https://www.momondo.nl/letsopenourworld/ Is your DNA a more genuine distinction of your "nationalities". Is ethnicity related to nationality. Is culture related to nationality?
Ethnocentrism
Overview Effect - seeing the world from outer space https://vimeo.com/55073825
The Space Between Us http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3922818/
Why a passport identity exists? which are the reasons they exists? do they identify us?
Can you look at yourself / your personality and find something 'typically' Australian, South African, Belgian? How family culture can get into your identity?
Italian travelled to Argentina. He felt at home there because of similar culture (many Italians there)
What defines a culture?
Language How does language shape cultural identity? It's also a specific tool. In some countries it's easier to explain food, weather, nature, technology
What was the reason we started having passports? History of passports
History of the visa - started in 1958
Costs of visas Compare difficulties / process of getting a visa Look into reasons why you do / do not need a visa Poland doesn't need a visa to China because they think Poland is still communistic
Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND) https://ind.nl
2016
Essay
Reading Notes
Collection of notes on things I'm reading/read.
Vilém FLUSSER
Talking at the Osnabrück, European Media Art Festival, 1988
POST-HISTORICAL STRUCTURAL TRADITION
Our current form of literacy is no longer sufficient to communicate current concepts concerning our world. To more precisely reflect on our world we are not solely able to explain it with language, neither written or spoken. To understand the world, we are no longer able to rely solely on words, it is necessary to calculate the world.
Vilém Flusser suggests that the only way we are able to reflect on our current existence is through synthetic images. He describes the language of science and mathematics is a visual language of thought through numbers, giving the example of the number two as the representation of a couple or pair. From this he goes on to suggest that the most appropriate tool to facilitate this realisation of synthetic images is through computing. At the time of this interview Flusser claimed that he had not yet seen any examples of this and suggests that we do not know how to yet manipulate the technology.
Flusser explains that before the alphabet images were used to represent the world. Images served to represent non linear mythical thought, a projection of understanding upon the world tied into past present and future. At the invention of the alphabet this non-linear representation of the world gave way to a linear, historically causal and critical method. Now linear, historical thought has been disrupted by a calculative method of thinking, which Flusser likes to call a systemic or structural way of thinking.
Our current revolution can be likened to the revolution that gave us the origin to history. One that returns to a non-linear, image based narrative, that likens to a pre-historical way of thinking. We are now in the process of developing a post-historical structural way of thinking.
Historically the philosophy of image cast a mostly negative opinion of 'the image'. Greek and Jewish (Christian) philosophy and thought considered images either only a copy or simulation of thought and so we have been conditioned to distrust images. However now images should be considered articulations of thought, not mere copies by projection or models. Flusser calls for a new conversation around images.
STRUCTURAL v FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXITY
Systems can be considered complex in 2 ways. Systems with structural complexity and systems with functional complexity. Structurally complex systems are ones that are complex in their construction, or operation but not in their interaction or output. Functionally complex systems are systems can be used in many different ways or has a functional nuance without necessarily being structurally complex.
Flusser gives the comparison between TV (structurally complex) and Chess (functionally complex). The television a technologically complex electronic device that decodes data into visual moving image and sound that is broadcast live to the viewer, is very simple to interact with or manipulate within its set parameters. Chess, a game made up of solely physical objects can be played 100 different ways and have many different outcomes.
As things are being designed more structurally complex without being necessarily functionally complex leads us to become intellectually, aesthetically and ethical less active or even able. It is Flussers analysis that it is not the fault of the systems themselves, but rather the responsibility on the users of the systems to find functional complexity in structurally complex systems.
The importance in doing this is because functionally complex systems encourage creative thought (arguably a calculative way to look at our world) whereas structurally complex systems currently allow us to stagnate in thought.