Unintended Images: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|Thumbnail=Screen Shot 2014-10-26 at 16.10.08.jpg
|Thumbnail=Screen Shot 2014-10-26 at 16.10.08.jpg
|Website=www.artyomkocharyan.com
|Website=www.artyomkocharyan.com
|Description=Artyom’s work entitled “New Image” is a series of images of that have been made using Google Image search results. In his work Artyom explores the relations between images and the technology that is responsible for their production and distribution. Namely how technological endeavors came to affect the dynamics within image culture.
|Description=Artyom’s work entitled “Related Images” is a series of digital paintings that are based on search results of Google Images. In his work Artyom examines the dynamics of current image culture, namely their proliferation within the online world.
With the advance of digital cameras and Internet images moved from the era of analogue photography and printed media as its agency of distribution, to the new era of digital imagery and numerous online databases. Google Images is arguably the most important distributor of images within this context. It serves as the agency that stands in between the user and the images that are stored in different corners of the web. It function as an encyclopedia that is able to give a visual representation of any given subject, even to ones of abstract and metaphysical nature.}}


Photography, shortly after its invention, took on itself the responsibility of documenting history and giving us images of our world that was previously granted to painting. Photography was the first image of the kind, one that is conceived through technologies – camera, that were products of modern science. Photography democratized the image making proses allowing anyone to produce an image with a click of a button. As well us taking images out from the realm of aesthetics and art which was peculiar to painting, and making them relevant to almost every aspect of culture. As technology developed giving us television and the general media establishment, the bigger part of our world became to be seen through those images than by our own eyes. In today’s online world images function as distinct communication medium and seem do be a better fit to the quick and accumulated online culture where they serve as windows through which we can access the world far beyond our reach.  
As a result of proliferation the online world become a space where images appear to their viewer within multiplicity, Google image search is such an example. By gathering multiple images within one page Google creates a new ‘large image’ that is constructed form multiple ones. Without it being its primary concern. Understandably so, Google disregards the aesthetical form of the ‘large image’ since it positions individual images according to their relevance rather then their visual content.
As a result, this ‘large images’ appear as ‘broken’ and fragmented, and have no coherence to be read as a single image.  


Photography as an image is known for its ability to give an objective representation of the world – it shows the world ‘as it is’. This notion although has been disproved by number of studies, is till excepted by the wider culture. Because of it scientific nature, namely the fact that the subject prescribes itself on the film without the involvement of human hand – without human subjectivity, photography came to gain its objective status. This notion went as far as making photography an image that can stand as a ‘proof’ for something. Similarly Google Images established itself as an agency that gives a precise and accurate representation of a subject. Its algorithms that developed in such way to display the most relevant and the most popular images of the subject. So its objective notion seems to rely again on its scientific factor, namely on the algorithmic analysis that automatically choose the content and arranging them by their on the page by their relevance.
Artyom’s work reflects on the incoherence that comes with the multiplicity of images. He uses screenshots of different Google search result, which he manipulates within Photoshop by using a ‘healing’ or a  ‘patching’ tool. For his series Artyom drew inspiration from several paintings, particularly those of Pieter Bruegel the Elder, which regardless of their overcrowded and noisy aesthetics managed to remain their wholeness as an image. Those paintings took into account the gaze of the viewer, providing pathways through which the human eye could travel the image. Similar Artyom’s work attempts to rehabilitate those ‘broken’ images and reintroduce a coherence that would allow them to be read as a whole.
}}

Revision as of 12:40, 21 May 2015

Unintended Images
Creator Artyom
Year 2015
Bio Artyom Kocharyan (AM) is visual artist based in Rotterdam. His work explores the contemporary visual culture, namely the culture of images that increasingly dominate the world of communication. Artyom’s work is concerned with the representation aspect of images and their ability to determine our vision of the world. Artyom is engaged with the representation apparatus that is peculiar to current digital and online culture.
Thumbnail
Screen Shot 2014-10-26 at 16.10.08.jpg
Website www.artyomkocharyan.com

Artyom’s work entitled “Related Images” is a series of digital paintings that are based on search results of Google Images. In his work Artyom examines the dynamics of current image culture, namely their proliferation within the online world.

As a result of proliferation the online world become a space where images appear to their viewer within multiplicity, Google image search is such an example. By gathering multiple images within one page Google creates a new ‘large image’ that is constructed form multiple ones. Without it being its primary concern. Understandably so, Google disregards the aesthetical form of the ‘large image’ since it positions individual images according to their relevance rather then their visual content. As a result, this ‘large images’ appear as ‘broken’ and fragmented, and have no coherence to be read as a single image.

Artyom’s work reflects on the incoherence that comes with the multiplicity of images. He uses screenshots of different Google search result, which he manipulates within Photoshop by using a ‘healing’ or a ‘patching’ tool. For his series Artyom drew inspiration from several paintings, particularly those of Pieter Bruegel the Elder, which regardless of their overcrowded and noisy aesthetics managed to remain their wholeness as an image. Those paintings took into account the gaze of the viewer, providing pathways through which the human eye could travel the image. Similar Artyom’s work attempts to rehabilitate those ‘broken’ images and reintroduce a coherence that would allow them to be read as a whole.