User:Chen Junyu/Graduation Project Seminar/ project proposal/Proposal3: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
Line 24: Line 24:
Here are some prototypes I have made. <br>
Here are some prototypes I have made. <br>
<br>[[File:Micro1.jpg|200px]]  [[File:7.JPG|200px]]  [[File:11.23.0.jpg|200px]]  [[File:11.26-2.jpg|200px]]<br>
<br>[[File:Micro1.jpg|200px]]  [[File:7.JPG|200px]]  [[File:11.23.0.jpg|200px]]  [[File:11.26-2.jpg|200px]]<br>
{{vimeo|111947308}}    {{vimeo|112118186}}
{{vimeo|113225212}}    {{vimeo|113225260}}
<br>  
<br>  
These two pics are the model of how the exhibition room looks like. I took some screenshots from google map in two spots in different angle. <br>
These two pics are the model of how the exhibition room looks like. I took some screenshots from google map in two spots in different angle. <br>

Revision as of 22:53, 30 November 2014

Project

The project will be an audiovisual installation. With the idea of "moving painting", the video clips will be multiple animation describes a same scene through different angle and scale. The video loops should be constructed by many frames of hand drawings as the general process of 2D animation. The difference of "moving painting" with general animation is it should be more detailed and relatively completeness, and the transform of aesthetic perception of the movement is important. The video will be projected onto different walls with multiple scale. There will not be "normal" size object appear in the videos, such as, a cigarette ends should be huge and a giant tree in the forest should be small as a tiny toy. For sound, there are two plans at this moment, one is to use a same stereo sound track, playing the environmental soundscape. The other one is adding different sound track to each screen, depends on the sale of the scene, how detailed the scene is, to generate sound with different volume, noisy and speed.

Introduction

After the research for EMO(Giants and Little People)[1] I have slightly moved further with the word "Scale". Since we born in this world, the scale of the world for us is always changing, it changes with the grow and shrink of our physical body, also relies on the understanding or our emotion/feeling to the world. At a macro level, out general understanding of this world is also changing by the time, such as the conversion of public perception from Geocentrism to Heliocentrism or the changing of peoples' feeling to nature presented in the western painting history.

Through advanced technique, there is no doubt that we can obeserve the function of cells which constructs our physical body, monitor every single moment of a chemical reaction and simulate the process of a black hole having its food. On one hand the scale for measuring the world is gaining its datas, on the other hand, it doesn't bring a big difference on our perception to the world. We still live in the same model of cities or towns designed and built hundred years ago, the scale of buildings or roads didn't experience big difference in the past years. We feel safe living in the artificial world, and, we are escaping from or eating out the outside nature. Maybe only when we stand alone in a wild forest without any human life's evidence, we finally can feel the original fear or the awareness of our tininess as human being did thougsand years ago.

When we talk about "nature", a general feeling is "nature" is something outside. It is not ture. If we look into the explanation of nature in wikipedia, in the first paragraph, it says :" 'Nature' refers to the phenomena of the physical world, and also to life in general. It ranges in scale from the subatomic to the cosmic." As a component of the earth, human being is also a part of "Nature". The air we breath everyday, the pollen floating in the air,the small potting which generates this pollen in our bedroom, they are also components of nature. Nature is not just something " out there", it is also something "in here". But, if we trace the etymology of "nature" --the latin word "natura", or "essential qualities, innate disposition", and in ancient times, literally meant "birth", something does changed. With the highly developing science and technology, we now have the ability to change the genes of creatures, and we already have done this. The "nature" in our impression, which is the " wild" in the proper context, now is more and more difficult to survive, or, can only survive by the power of civilization -- at that time, the "wild" is also not the original "wild", it is something lokks like "the wild" and living under the proof of civilization. And the concept of "Nature", also need to be changed with this inescapable artificial power.

Relation to previous practice

Animation, painting, spirit of craftsman, the perfect circle, nature, human figure and the nonperceptible magic around us... If all of this fragments

Relation to a larger context

Hiroshi Senju <The Fall> Hiroshi Senju focuses on drawing falls and other natural objects for years, and he created a precise way to present falls. By carefully chosing the material like the paper, pigments and tools, also the space for placing the work, the light surrounding, he builds up immersive environment successfully.

Moving Painting

Practical steps


Here are some prototypes I have made.

Micro1.jpg 7.JPG 11.23.0.jpg 11.26-2.jpg

http://vimeo.com/113225212

http://vimeo.com/113225260
These two pics are the model of how the exhibition room looks like. I took some screenshots from google map in two spots in different angle.

Pre-presentation4.jpg Prototype11.27.jpg

Pre-present2.jpg Pre-presentation1.jpg

References

Oliver Grau Virtual Art -- From Illusion To Immersion

Gyorgy Kepes The Nature and Art of Motion

Max Luthi The Fairytale as Art Form and Portrait of Man'

[English Scripts]Earth, Sea, and Sky: Nature in Western Art: Masterpieces from The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Michael Pollan "The Botany of Desire"