User:Marlon/projectproposal: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==


'''The Template''' This year I'm looking into 'template culture', inspired by a Samsung smartphone commercial that promises its customers a chance to 'design their lives'. A mobile app or an account on a social networking site might give us a semblance of control, as a tool to express ourselves or to display our distinct personalities. But in reality, there is something quite depersonalizing about it: we're all taking the same type of pictures on the same type of phone and uploading them to the same website. What are we online, people or avatars? Do we really have any control over these tools or are just templates and filters with minimal customization options? How does this relate to lifestyle and advertisement?
'''The Template''' This graduation year I am looking into ''template culture'', inspired by a Samsung smartphone commercial that promises its customers a chance to 'design their lives'. Mobile phones, apps and social networking sites are branded as services we can use to express ourselves online or to display our distinct personalities. But in reality, there is something quite depersonalizing about it: we are all taking the same type of pictures on the same type of phone and uploading them to the same website.
 
Not only do these devices and websites guarantee some kind of palette to 'paint your life' more beautiful, but extra features will help users manage every aspect of their busy lives. Not manage, compose! A semblance of control is promoted, not just related to lifestyle, but over the use of these applications as well. You decide the content, style and the presentation. But is this promise fulfilled or are they not just templates (or interfaces, filters) with minimal customization options? And do these templates, by giving users the option to customize and personalize, only generate a mass of homogenous content?


This topic is connected to my interest in user-generated content and amateur artwork created within the limitations of these tools. And how the online communities of the World Wide Web are used as a platform to display this art. Not for profit, but not always strictly legal either. For example: movie subtitles for illegally downloaded movies, Harry Potter fanfiction, Youtube reviews, Instagram beauty pageants.
This topic is connected to my interest in user-generated content and amateur artwork created within the limitations of these tools. And how the online communities of the World Wide Web are used as a platform to display this art. Not for profit, but not always strictly legal either. For example: movie subtitles for illegally downloaded movies, Harry Potter fanfiction, Youtube reviews, Instagram beauty pageants.

Revision as of 14:28, 6 November 2013

Okt 16, 2013

Introduction

The Template This graduation year I am looking into template culture, inspired by a Samsung smartphone commercial that promises its customers a chance to 'design their lives'. Mobile phones, apps and social networking sites are branded as services we can use to express ourselves online or to display our distinct personalities. But in reality, there is something quite depersonalizing about it: we are all taking the same type of pictures on the same type of phone and uploading them to the same website.

Not only do these devices and websites guarantee some kind of palette to 'paint your life' more beautiful, but extra features will help users manage every aspect of their busy lives. Not manage, compose! A semblance of control is promoted, not just related to lifestyle, but over the use of these applications as well. You decide the content, style and the presentation. But is this promise fulfilled or are they not just templates (or interfaces, filters) with minimal customization options? And do these templates, by giving users the option to customize and personalize, only generate a mass of homogenous content?

This topic is connected to my interest in user-generated content and amateur artwork created within the limitations of these tools. And how the online communities of the World Wide Web are used as a platform to display this art. Not for profit, but not always strictly legal either. For example: movie subtitles for illegally downloaded movies, Harry Potter fanfiction, Youtube reviews, Instagram beauty pageants.

Methodology My research should also focus on form, on the graphic/visual language of digital culture, the boundaries and technical limitations of a medium. This has been my trusted method of working: recontextualising, repurposing or reusing content I find online. Instead of only focusing on this content (the images, the comments, the posts) I would like to investigate how this well of information is presented to us. Through the interfaces, templates and control panels we encounter while we're browsing, uploading and contributing.

Relation to previous practice

Pirate Bay Archive:

Karel Bilek created an archive of the Pirate Bay, a website that indexes (illegal) content available for download. The archive, an 75MB .XML file (a format used to store data), contains over 1,6 million links to torrent files. That would make it possible to recreate The Pirate Bay if it would ever be taken offline. As a very simple exercise I randomly displayed one item of the list on a website, with a link to the download. This gives users access to an enormous amount of content, but without the 'search option' it loses almost all its functionality. I appreciate the idea of a relatively small file representing such a vast amount of content. What other uses could it have, besides being the basis of a search engine like website?

.NFO-files:

.NFO files are a prominent tradition within the file sharing subculture. In the past the limited technical possibilities set boundaries for how the file looked and although the software used to create these files has developed significantly, the overall look of an .NFO file has remained the same, all due to its nostalgic value.

As a graphic designer, I am impressed with how the creators of these files manage to construct something great with very little: a limited toolbox of white on black or black on white symbols is used to make impressive pieces of work. Though most of the .NFO files are kept clean and simple, some show elaborate drawings and typography – the files have changed from a necessity to a form of expression. It is the "corporate identity" of individuals or groups of people that manifest themselves online.

Peer-to-peer-to-Peer-to-peer:

A collage of images, downloaded via Google Images and printed on seperate pages, that symbolize peer-to-peer networks. The printed pages overlap, connecting the peers of one diagram to those of another, forming a larger network of peer-to-peer networks.

Peers can form a network of nodes in which they share data peer-to-peer, without any central coordination. Currently the term "peer-to-peer" is at the height of its popularity, something you see reflected in the striking amount of images visualising the system that circulate the Web. Though the system stays the same, its use is in constant development. This "evolution" can be observed when looking at these images: the older images are smaller in file-size, with low-tech graphics depicting desktop computers, while the newer versions illustrate the increasing social impact of the peer-to-peer system.

- - - - -

Tsunami by proxy

An older, but similar project, focused on virality in relation to the World Wide Web. It is a collection of around 1200 postcards, printed with popular images found online that depict the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster in Japan. (Natural) disasters are visual stories and the images that most accurately capture the imagination of the viewer are very popular online, even if they are stills from movies or images from other disasters.

Reading list

Books

1. Andrejevic, M (2004) Reality TV
Chapter Two: The Promise of the Digital Revolution

2. Galloway, A (2012) The Interface Effect

3. Manovich, L (2008) Software Takes Command

Notes

Practical steps

October/November:

To avoid getting stuck in thinking, reading and conceptualizing, I've started making (very) small projects. Projects that are finished in a day, sometimes in an hour. These are experiments in different forms across a selection of media, that have so far generated mostly visual output. The process and results will be documented in a work log, even when they're 'silly', 'superficial', unoriginal or complete failures. Hopefully in four weeks I have accumulated quite a number of smaller projects, of which one or two could lead to further investigation and eventually turned into a bigger, conceptually stronger project.


Here follows a list of ideas, which all focus on the idea of recontextualizing online content: by extracting it from the Internet, changing the medium, or by making something digital physical. Online/offline, static/dynamic.

1. I will look into NFO-files, as a way to research limitations and restrictions. An NFO-file creator has a 'toolbox' that only contains 95 printable characters. This project consists of (small) experiments, investigating the possibility of making an .NFO-file physical (or extracting it from its original frame: the software programs that can 'read' them). The ASCII characters function as the building blocks of an .NFO-file, but what will happen if these characters are replaced with different symbols or physical objects?

2. What does your Instagram filter say about you?[1] Instagram is a photosharing, social networking service for smartphones. It offers users the ability to put a special photographic filter on the pictures they upload. I'm curious how these filters would look like outside of their social networking smartphone context? Could you filter an empty image, a physical space or maybe another filter?

2b. The Instagram pageant. A beauty contest on Instagram, where girls ask visitors to rate their appearance (#rateme). The new 'hot or not?'. Losers get a red X across their faces. Grids of pictures remind me of grids of filters.

3. Pirate Bay Archive: research in to an aspect of the file, but not the content. Is there a way to visualize both the small size of the archive and the amount of content it gives access to?

4. An endless loop of 'loading' images.

References