User:Roelroscama/creativeIndustries: Difference between revisions
Roelroscama (talk | contribs) |
Roelroscama (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
There seem to be interesting parrallels in: | There seem to be interesting parrallels in: | ||
- artists trying to be discovered through calls, paid entries to competitions etc. Willing to work un(der)paid for long itmes in the hope of fame/money/career | - artists trying to be discovered through calls, paid entries to competitions etc. | ||
- people running tech-startups investing massive amounts of time and resources in the hopes of discovering something to attract venture capital or being being bought-up by | Willing to work un(der)paid for long itmes in the hope of fame/money/career | ||
- people running tech-startups investing massive amounts of time and resources in the hopes of discovering something to attract venture capital | |||
or being being bought-up by technology firms. | |||
- gamblers willing to continue playing against the odds in the hopes of striking the one lucky time that justifies all. | - gamblers willing to continue playing against the odds in the hopes of striking the one lucky time that justifies all. | ||
Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
Eventhough most participants in these 'lotteries' lose, or do not gain in in a big way, they keep participating. Inspired by the few examples of those that became lucky. | Eventhough most participants in these 'lotteries' lose, or do not gain in in a big way, they keep participating. Inspired by the few examples of those that became lucky. | ||
Gamblers betting on games/lotteries often rely on pseudo-rationalization to justify why they of all people will win. Relying on lucky numbers, | Gamblers betting on games/lotteries often rely on pseudo-rationalization to justify why they of all people will win. Relying on lucky numbers, detecting patterns etc. to give them an edge. | ||
The same goes for start-ups and artists. Rationalizing their marginal existence and low odds on pseudo-rational reasoning. "If I do this job un(der)paid now.. I have a chance to get a paid one next time" | The same goes for start-ups and artists. Rationalizing their marginal existence and low odds of success on pseudo-rational reasoning. "If I do this job un(der)paid now.. I have a chance to get a paid one next time". (Then again this is a very economic way of reasoning and as [http://www.hansabbing.nl/DOCeconomist/SUMMARY.pdf Hans Abbing suggested], artists defy the laws of economics and value other forms of reward over economic gain.) | ||
As stock markets trading is done increasingly by algorithms and is no longer a traditional trader's job, those who sit on copious amount of money no longer invest in stock. Instead they choose to invest in potentially highly rewarding technology startups. A lottery of sorts in itself, where countless fruitless investments are justified by the one that strikes it big. | |||
== Different lottery schemes == | == Different lottery schemes == |
Revision as of 09:47, 26 May 2013
Background / De Koffieconcurrent
De koffieconcurrent was a shop that sold very affordable cups of coffee in the hallways of the Willem de Kooning Academy. It's business model was as simple as it was mad: To sell cheap coffee and to buy lottery scratchcards with the proceedings at the end of the day. The potential for insane returns and soaring profits was tempting and seemingly within reach for the duration of the month. After a month of running the Koffieconcurrent we made 24 euros with the sales of coffee. After investing these in scratchcards the balance totalled 22 euros.
The project on www.the-force-of-freedom.com
Lottery as a businessmodel
There seem to be interesting parrallels in:
- artists trying to be discovered through calls, paid entries to competitions etc. Willing to work un(der)paid for long itmes in the hope of fame/money/career - people running tech-startups investing massive amounts of time and resources in the hopes of discovering something to attract venture capital or being being bought-up by technology firms. - gamblers willing to continue playing against the odds in the hopes of striking the one lucky time that justifies all.
Eventhough most participants in these 'lotteries' lose, or do not gain in in a big way, they keep participating. Inspired by the few examples of those that became lucky.
Gamblers betting on games/lotteries often rely on pseudo-rationalization to justify why they of all people will win. Relying on lucky numbers, detecting patterns etc. to give them an edge.
The same goes for start-ups and artists. Rationalizing their marginal existence and low odds of success on pseudo-rational reasoning. "If I do this job un(der)paid now.. I have a chance to get a paid one next time". (Then again this is a very economic way of reasoning and as Hans Abbing suggested, artists defy the laws of economics and value other forms of reward over economic gain.)
As stock markets trading is done increasingly by algorithms and is no longer a traditional trader's job, those who sit on copious amount of money no longer invest in stock. Instead they choose to invest in potentially highly rewarding technology startups. A lottery of sorts in itself, where countless fruitless investments are justified by the one that strikes it big.
Different lottery schemes
Artworkers4Artworkers:
All participants pay a monthly fee to the program. Once a month a large grant awarded is awarded amongst the participants
social net for artists:
crowdbetting app scheme -> everyone partakes in the various lotteries for a monthly fee -> the web enables people from different countries (and differet lotteries to take part) -> the enhanced winning chance is a motiviation to join -> winning tickets are divided amongst the network.
or
art-socialism: splitting the revenues of works of people in the network -> if someone makes a sale, everyone gets paid a slice. guaranteeing everyone a stable income in the lottery art-market
or
App Solutionism
It must be an app.
Salespitch as medium
Nice Oddities