Writing Machines Notebook: Difference between revisions
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
=== Michael Winkler: Where Signs Resemble Thoughts === | === Michael Winkler: Where Signs Resemble Thoughts === | ||
* Michael Winkler: both an author and an artist | |||
* Llanguage is a code (we all came up with it and agreed on it) | |||
* The point of a code: someone else has to be able to understand | |||
* Winkler made symbols out of words by connecting the letters within a circle (there are other possible codes!) | |||
* Connecting the words with the symblos, it's possible to reflect on the word itself > serendipity | |||
* Interesting exercise to take language (and words) apart and look at the single components | |||
* Ideographic: (greek: ideo = that is seen; gramma: letter / written sign) | |||
* Other writing systems are (more) symbolic in themselves > with e.g. Chinese a system like winkler's would be way more compilcated > sign for "fire" looks like a bonfire, for "person" looks like a stick figure | |||
* Visually resembles the connection between stars (as in astrology) | |||
* Language as a code is underlying computing, but the codes in computing are very inaccessible to people using other writing systems | |||
* Xu Bing ! | |||
Revision as of 15:02, 15 October 2025
Annotations, sketches, shards, snippets, marginalia
Please use headers and edit subsections only to avoid parallel edit problems :)
Uncreative Writing: Bart's Note
Date: 17/09/2025
Reading group: Bart - Ema - Robin - Tommi - Youjung
Protocol: We take turns reading pieces of the physical book out loud. While one person is reading the others will take notes in a digital copy of the text.
Notes:
Another subheader :)
Methods 2025-10-01: Group Discussions Of Texts That Had Been Read
Georges Perec: The Art of Asking your Boss for a Raise (org.: L'art et la manière d'aborder son chef de service pour lui demander une augmentation)
Marcel Bénabou: Rule and Constraint (org.: La règle et la contrainte)
- Rule is a metric or a form while a constraint is a generative result
- Benabou argues in favour of constraint and points out to both strict and freedom-based literary schools of thought, as if they were missing the whole point of language: which is to be treated as an object in itself, not a mere conveyor of information.
- Some forms of constraint are accepted/desired: poetic forms like an alexandrine or a sonnet (also, haiku or limerick) have specific rhyme schemes, or a set number of syllables or lines
- Constraints does not confine the authors but liberates them, you escape from your own censorship.
- Constraints can enhance your creativity by limiting your toolset. Rules are for comprehension, constraints are for cerativity.
- Language is something material, i think about the container(like a book, laptop) but language & rules itself have a material, what differentiates grammar and crazy writing machines
- "Each page is a bed where letters lie"
- "Constraint forces the system out of its routine functioning, thereby compelling it to reveal its hidden resources"
- "Constraint goes beyond rules, people who have questioned language can escape the system and reveal hidden resources" – maybe a reason why someone starts to learn coding to understand the constraints
Raymond Queneau: A Story as You Like It
- Interesting to put this into the context of the time when it was created, modern day the stories are very complex but might have been interesting back in the days.
- All of the choices that you get at the end is very opinionated, everything is a opinion which is quite different from asking your boss for a raise. In this, reader casts a judgement to the choice and story.
Paul Fournel: The Theater Tree — A Combinatory Play
- Example for different ways of writing scripts/texts (like a "choose your own adventure games")
- Black mirror: pretended that the way the story was made is revelutionary, but actually it was not! Fournels ideas at the time also not revolutionary
- Similiar structure to Italo Calvino's books
Michael Winkler: Where Signs Resemble Thoughts
- Michael Winkler: both an author and an artist
- Llanguage is a code (we all came up with it and agreed on it)
- The point of a code: someone else has to be able to understand
- Winkler made symbols out of words by connecting the letters within a circle (there are other possible codes!)
- Connecting the words with the symblos, it's possible to reflect on the word itself > serendipity
- Interesting exercise to take language (and words) apart and look at the single components
- Ideographic: (greek: ideo = that is seen; gramma: letter / written sign)
- Other writing systems are (more) symbolic in themselves > with e.g. Chinese a system like winkler's would be way more compilcated > sign for "fire" looks like a bonfire, for "person" looks like a stick figure
- Visually resembles the connection between stars (as in astrology)
- Language as a code is underlying computing, but the codes in computing are very inaccessible to people using other writing systems
- Xu Bing !