User:Queenfeline/Projectproposal: Difference between revisions
Queenfeline (talk | contribs) |
Queenfeline (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
==<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size:30pt;">potential thesis</span>== | ==<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size:30pt;">potential thesis</span>== | ||
===notes=== | |||
What do you WANT to write? (what will the text </br> | What do you WANT to write? (what will the text </br> | ||
be about? What do you want to explore? </br> | be about? What do you want to explore? </br> | ||
| Line 78: | Line 79: | ||
3. The power of reclaiming words as an activist act </br> | 3. The power of reclaiming words as an activist act </br> | ||
:::::: I want to write an analytical essay. I want to dive into the sociolinguistics and uncover how sexist and man-made our vernacular is and how we can take a step into changing that. Language is about representation. Who you speak about and how, directly affects that groups position in society and their experience in this world. I want to write about the phenomenon that female words get devalued over time and why that is. Adding to that i want to write about the active work of reclaiming these words to reclaim power (for ourselves and ultimately how we're seen and treated in society) | :::::: I want to write an analytical essay. I want to dive into the sociolinguistics and uncover how sexist and man-made our vernacular is and how we can take a step into changing that. Language is about representation. Who you speak about and how, directly affects that groups position in society and their experience in this world. I want to write about the phenomenon that female words get devalued over time and why that is. Adding to that i want to write about the active work of reclaiming these words to reclaim power (for ourselves and ultimately how we're seen and treated in society). Words literally create the world around us and has an impact on or experiences in this world. | ||
| Line 105: | Line 106: | ||
::::::Transitioning into: How 'female' words need active reclaiming in order to experience a revaluation. What reclaiming is and how it works (on the example on language). | ::::::Transitioning into: How 'female' words need active reclaiming in order to experience a revaluation. What reclaiming is and how it works (on the example on language). | ||
TO–DO | |||
– specify what i mean with 'female' word (wordslut) | |||
– | |||
===Intro=== | |||
::Introducing the upcoming chapters briefly: | |||
:::First, the relationship between language, power and representation. Why is language a feminist issue? How is it used to uphold and reinforce power structures? Who gets to speak and who is spoken about (in what way)? | |||
:::Second, the cultural taboo around “cunt”, its history (etymology) and its significance. When did this word emerge? What was the 'original' meaning and how did it change over time? How did the word became a site of misogyny? What is the “problem” reclamation is responding to? | |||
:::Third, the active fight for reclaiming a word. How does reclaiming work? Who gets to reclaim? How does the reclaiming of cunt teaches us who controls meaning? | |||
::State what i wish to transport with this essay: how reclaiming language reclaims power. Showing how reclaiming is a strategic act of resistance that exposes how meaning is socially constructed (embedding chapter one) and can be rewritten / changed. | |||
===Chapter 1=== | |||
::This chapter explores how language shapes and sustains power relations. | |||
::Who gets to speak, who is spoken about, and in what way? Through feminist linguistic theory, it will uncover how everyday speech patterns and word meanings reflect patriarchal values and how this creates linguistic inequality. | |||
::Deborah Cameron – how language doesn’t just reflect reality but creates it. How language is a weapon, used by the powerful to oppress their subordinates. How words define social visibility. Being “unnamed” or “misnamed” is a form of erasure / silencing / invisibility. | |||
===Chapter 2=== | |||
– | ::This chapter explores the etymology of the word “cunt”. | ||
::What did the word mean throughout history and how did the once neutral anatomical term (referring to the female genitals) become one of the most reviled words in the English language? | |||
::– The connection between linguistic taboos and the societal control over women’s bodies and sexuality. How the changing attitudes toward sexuality, modesty, and female anatomy under patriarchy influenced the change in meaning, resulting in silencing of female sexuality, alienation from the female body, and internalized shame. (How there is a broader linguistic phenomenon where female-coded terms become devalued for example mistress, madam, hussy. But maybe thats too much) | |||
===Chapter 3=== | |||
::This chapter explores how feminist movements and thinkers have reclaimed “cunt” as a term of empowerment and political resistance, and what this process reveals about who controls meaning. | |||
::How does semantic reclamation work? –> How marginalized groups reappropriate derogatory terms. | |||
::– Example: Inga Muscio’s ''Cunt: A Declaration of Independence'' (1998) and in todays pop-culture / internet | |||
::(The intersectional issues: race, class, sexuality. Who feels empowered and who alienated by reclamation? The critiques of white feminism and inclusivity within linguistic activism) | |||
::Making clear / showing that words have constructed meaning, made through societal consensus and not inherent meanings set in stone. Connecting to chapter 1, how meaning and power are connected and how reclaiming language means reclaiming power. Show how reclamation is also a refusal to let patriarchal discourse dictate women’s self-definition. | |||
===Conclusion=== | |||
::Bringing back the research question and stating a short and concise summary of the main arguments from the text. How feminist linguistic activism does not just change words, but changes the worlds we inhabit through them. | |||
===Glossary=== | |||
::My thesis needs (of course) a glossary duh! In here will we words like: woman / semantic reclamation / reappropriation | |||
semantic derogation / tbc... | |||
Revision as of 18:20, 15 October 2025
proposed proposals
Graduate proposal guidelines
potential glossary
What do you want to make?
- I am thinking about making a feminist glossary website with words in / from / around feminist context. There will be an "about" or explanation on the topic and why this website exists and how it works. You can find a manifesto of the mission this website find itself on. The website will have a list of all letters of the alphabet; Sorted to give them some structure. Each letter has a subpage with words starting with that letter and their definition / context / quote / etc. The website is going to have a submit tool, where I invite people to contribute to the glossary. I hope that a more open-ended, or generative rather than fixed glossary will emerge, where definitions are open to multiple interpretations, narratives, or contradictions. I want to invite all voices to the meaning-making process. The submitted add-ons to the words are open / can take any form (from quotes to personal meanings) and make room for recontextualising and reclaiming. Maybe there is also a section for comments, where people can talk about the contributions or the contributions themselves are that. I think the most interesting moment is when contributions contradict each other. Because it is about context and the one who speaks and listens. Reclaiming is specific to the group of oppressed and not everyone who feels like it.
- There is also going to be a tool for printing. You can select the words you find interesting / useful / important and make a .pdf that you can print and make a little zine out of.
- I want to make it easy to share and so well explained, that everyone can understand it and no one feels excluded. I think it is very important that we keep the discourse accessible, so people know what it i about and what they can do about it.
How do you plan to make it?
- coding the website and sharing it
What is your timetable?
- Start with coding the website.
- Write a manifesto / guidelines for submitting
- Hopefully get the basic framework done till the first public moment so people can already contribute to it. Let it grow over time with more and more words and contributions.
- I would also love to make a book version of it at some point closer to graduation to have a physical version of it. (add dates when printed to it so people know its only a extract from a specific moment of time.)
Why do you want to make it?
- Why make it includes two main questions. First, why should one concern oneself with words and language? and second, why make a glossary?.
- To answer the first question: Words hold power. Words help us make sense of our experiences. Words make our experiences communicable. Language is a human tool for organization, so inherently language is always a reflection of the society we find ourselves in. Our society is made by men for men, and everyone who does not identify with that is excluded and oppressed in one or many ways. To understand in what ways this exclusion and oppression takes place means gaining knowledge in how to fight it. So in using certain words we can reclaim power over the man-made language. Speaking is about representation. Who is allowed to speak and who is listened to? Who defines meaning and how does language reflect and reinforces power dynamics? Feminists are deeply concerned with language and linguistic to be able to speak and be heard in that and many other discourses. I also learned in researching this topic, that there are so many hidden sexist structures in our vernacular, that we uphold our own oppression without even noticing it. So i want to make people notice in themselves and in others how and in what ways language is used to suppress women and how we can actively fight that.
- To answer the second question: A dictionary claims to be neutral and encompasses every word ever. Even though there surely is a moment of deciding which words to put in and how to describe them, which cannot inherently be objective. Anyways, a glossary doesn't claim this neutrality and is in a classical sense a list of terms and words that are special to a certain context and that may be misunderstood (in that specific context) without explanation. I also see it as a moment to change the point of view on a word and recontextualise it. So what happens to a glossary if we abandon objectivity and embrace subjectivity? What if we let the lived experiences define our words and how we use them?
- So all in all I really hope that on the way to a more equal society, i can contribute my little piece to the pie and help the progress of building a language that is more inclusive and representative of all kinds of experiences not just mens.
Who can help you and how?
- I know that will need help in coding from my classmates and tutors. My friends, and basically everyone I know, can help in contributing to the database, adding words and definitions / quotes / anything that comes to mind. I also set up a little list on the cord board for people to leave words that should be in a feminist glossary.
- I want to reach out to Michelle Teran, Ali Sahin from WdKA to get in touch and talk. They helped making the wor(l)dings book which is also a glossary and i think they might have some useful and interesting insights and opinions.
Relation to previous practice
- It combines my interests in language and words and the feminist fight for equality. I find it so fascinating to research words and find out where they come from and what they really mean, how meaning changes over time and with the context we use it in. And i was shook when I first learned how much sexism hides in the language and words I use almost daily. What I wanted to express and what I really said were different things and that feeling of alienation got me into learning more about it and changing the ways in which i speak and the importance and power language holds.
Relation to a larger context
- I want to contribute my tiny little piece to the fight for equality. I guess doing something is better than nothing even if it only reaches a small amount of people.
References/bibliography
- Wordslut – Amanda Montell
- Wor(l)ding: A Harvested Glossary for Social Justice in Arts Education and Beyond – Michelle Teran, Ali Sahin, Kari Robertson, Pablo Lerma
- Feminism and Linguistic Theory – Daborah Cameron
- Keywords for Radicals – Kelly Fritsch, Clare O'Connor, AK Thompson
(potential card game)
What do you want to make?
- I want to make a card game. It will be a box with cards in them. There is two sets of cards. One set contains random words. The other set contains catcalls / situations or maybe questions that makes the person share an experience. There will be an introduction that comes with a trigger warning. The game will work in the following way: One person pulls one card from the experience pile and shares a story or an experience where they felt they were treated unfairly. With the help of the others and by pulling a random word the group has to come up with a response (that contains the random word) to the explained situation.
How do you plan to make it?
- My plan on developing this project is to gather experiences or questions, that leads the person to share an experience and random words. I will print them on paper and cut them into cards. I will write a description on how to play this game. So to say, I will print a prototype and try to „play“ it with my friends and/or classmates. I will ask them to take notes while or after playing and give me their feedback and opinions.
What is your timetable?
Why do you want to make it?
- But why do I want to make this card game? I got this idea while reading about the importance on linguistics in the feminist movement. Deborah Cameron wrote in her book "Feminism and Linguistic Theory" about the act of consciousness raising. Groups of women gathered to simply talk about their experiences as women* walking this earth. It is a moment where women* uncover the roots and precise nature of their oppression. So the act of speaking about experiences, as in naming it or only putting it into words, sharing them and then getting others to acknowledge it, is an integral part of the feminist movement. With this card game I want to open a space where women* can share their experiences and raise consciousness on their oppression and leave with a feeling of togetherness and understanding. I hope that as a side effect, the players will become quick-witted in such situations in real life or leave them with a feeling of being stronger than the world makes them believe and more able to react when such situations happen in real life. Now this seems to be made only for women* of course this game can also be "played" by men*, as speaking about experiences in this world will leave everyone with a greater understanding for the others, no matter the gender. So I think raising consciousness in a safer space will be beneficial for everybody (also across generations).
Who can help you and how?
- My friends and classmates can help me find out if this first of all actually works.
- My family could also help me figure out if it is indeed an intergenerational thing.
- Everybody who is willing to talk to me about it is helping me to fine-tune the game and clarify my idea.
Relation to previous practice
- It relates to previous practices in a sense that it is about feminism and using our language in a good and helpful way. It is also my interest to raise consciousness not only in the feminist movement but everywhere.
Relation to a larger context
- It relates to the second wave feminist movement and brings practices they came up with in our time and context. It continues the fight against sexism.
References/bibliography
- Deborah Cameron – "Feminism and Linguistic Theory"
potential thesis
notes
What do you WANT to write? (what will the text
be about? What do you want to explore?
Be clear about HOW you want to tell your story.
Outline 3 key issues you want to explore:
1. The power that language holds
2. how sexist language is and how it shapes the way we live
3. The power of reclaiming words as an activist act
- I want to write an analytical essay. I want to dive into the sociolinguistics and uncover how sexist and man-made our vernacular is and how we can take a step into changing that. Language is about representation. Who you speak about and how, directly affects that groups position in society and their experience in this world. I want to write about the phenomenon that female words get devalued over time and why that is. Adding to that i want to write about the active work of reclaiming these words to reclaim power (for ourselves and ultimately how we're seen and treated in society). Words literally create the world around us and has an impact on or experiences in this world.
Chapter outline (what do i expect to find?)
- 1. The power language holds
- Here i want to show how the words we use literally create the world around us. Language gives names to our experiences. It reflects and reinforces our believes, the existing power structures and structures of oppression. Language is strategically used to exclude certain groups from the societal discourse (e.g. in form of linguistic alienation).
- Furthermore i want to write about the phenomenon that words who get connected to females, experience an devaluation over time. What seems like happens by accident is a reflection on the sexist society we find ourselves in. In comparison to that, 'male' words almost always experience an revaluation. Why is that?
- 1. The power language holds
- 2. How sexist language shapes our lives
- I want to uncover fields of everyday life that hold more sexism then we expect or are aware of. From address terms to curse words. Understanding that language itself is not sexist but the way we use it.
- 2. How sexist language shapes our lives
- 3. The powerful act of reclaiming language
- This chapter is gonna contain how the reclaiming of a 'female' word needs active work to experience an revaluation.
- 3. The powerful act of reclaiming language
holy shit is is all still way to broad...
- Uh maybe i do all this on the example of one word! (e.g diva/bitch/cunt...) Then the structure would more likely look like that:
- 1. The etymology of the word
- So to say a glimpse in the history of the word. How is has been used throughout the years and how the dictionary defined then and now.
- 2. De- and revaluation
- De- and revaluation of words in general. So how and why does that happen? Then more specifically on the example on the word. How and why did it happen in this case?
- 3. The act of reclaiming a word for oneself and the societal consequences
- Transitioning into: How 'female' words need active reclaiming in order to experience a revaluation. What reclaiming is and how it works (on the example on language).
TO–DO – specify what i mean with 'female' word (wordslut) –
Intro
- Introducing the upcoming chapters briefly:
- First, the relationship between language, power and representation. Why is language a feminist issue? How is it used to uphold and reinforce power structures? Who gets to speak and who is spoken about (in what way)?
- Second, the cultural taboo around “cunt”, its history (etymology) and its significance. When did this word emerge? What was the 'original' meaning and how did it change over time? How did the word became a site of misogyny? What is the “problem” reclamation is responding to?
- Third, the active fight for reclaiming a word. How does reclaiming work? Who gets to reclaim? How does the reclaiming of cunt teaches us who controls meaning?
- State what i wish to transport with this essay: how reclaiming language reclaims power. Showing how reclaiming is a strategic act of resistance that exposes how meaning is socially constructed (embedding chapter one) and can be rewritten / changed.
- Introducing the upcoming chapters briefly:
Chapter 1
- This chapter explores how language shapes and sustains power relations.
- Who gets to speak, who is spoken about, and in what way? Through feminist linguistic theory, it will uncover how everyday speech patterns and word meanings reflect patriarchal values and how this creates linguistic inequality.
- Deborah Cameron – how language doesn’t just reflect reality but creates it. How language is a weapon, used by the powerful to oppress their subordinates. How words define social visibility. Being “unnamed” or “misnamed” is a form of erasure / silencing / invisibility.
Chapter 2
- This chapter explores the etymology of the word “cunt”.
- What did the word mean throughout history and how did the once neutral anatomical term (referring to the female genitals) become one of the most reviled words in the English language?
- – The connection between linguistic taboos and the societal control over women’s bodies and sexuality. How the changing attitudes toward sexuality, modesty, and female anatomy under patriarchy influenced the change in meaning, resulting in silencing of female sexuality, alienation from the female body, and internalized shame. (How there is a broader linguistic phenomenon where female-coded terms become devalued for example mistress, madam, hussy. But maybe thats too much)
Chapter 3
- This chapter explores how feminist movements and thinkers have reclaimed “cunt” as a term of empowerment and political resistance, and what this process reveals about who controls meaning.
- How does semantic reclamation work? –> How marginalized groups reappropriate derogatory terms.
- – Example: Inga Muscio’s Cunt: A Declaration of Independence (1998) and in todays pop-culture / internet
- (The intersectional issues: race, class, sexuality. Who feels empowered and who alienated by reclamation? The critiques of white feminism and inclusivity within linguistic activism)
- Making clear / showing that words have constructed meaning, made through societal consensus and not inherent meanings set in stone. Connecting to chapter 1, how meaning and power are connected and how reclaiming language means reclaiming power. Show how reclamation is also a refusal to let patriarchal discourse dictate women’s self-definition.
Conclusion
- Bringing back the research question and stating a short and concise summary of the main arguments from the text. How feminist linguistic activism does not just change words, but changes the worlds we inhabit through them.
Glossary
- My thesis needs (of course) a glossary duh! In here will we words like: woman / semantic reclamation / reappropriation
semantic derogation / tbc...