User:Lucian Wester/project3: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
(Created page with " Trimester (1, 2 or 3), Year. OR Graduation Project, Year. '''NOTE: All documentation material, PDF, photos, videos, etc, must be uploaded to the wiki. No embedding or third p...")
 
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:
Abstract and bibs/ref + link to PDF (PDF must be uploaded to wiki). <br />
Abstract and bibs/ref + link to PDF (PDF must be uploaded to wiki). <br />
Use Steve's recommendations for abstract length and bibliographic style.
Use Steve's recommendations for abstract length and bibliographic style.
== texts thematic ==
Michel Gondry
You’ll like this film because you’re in it: the be kind rewind protocol.
Gondry starts with telling us about his utopian idea of communities making their own movies. And what he in the end creates is his utopian idea. Gondry states that he needed to make all the rules and sets in order to leave and create more space for the actual creative filmmaking. The participants otherwise didn’t know what to do or how to start.
Through his protocol a group would collectively make a film whereas in Hollywood al the decisions are made by the director, Gondry explains (although I think that a producer has also al lot of influence, why otherwise al the director cuts on DVDs?). But isn’t Gondry, on a Meta level, not the director of all the movies created within the gallery space?
Through his protocol there is not much space for experiment or different forms of filmmaking other than the by Gondry dictated Hollywood’s way.
The whole project eventually has not so much to do with creativity but rather more with giving a work process for a community to make a film. It is the community who needs the rules not the creativity.


== Additional Information ==
== Additional Information ==

Revision as of 09:58, 17 April 2012

Trimester (1, 2 or 3), Year.
OR
Graduation Project, Year.

NOTE: All documentation material, PDF, photos, videos, etc, must be uploaded to the wiki. No embedding or third party hosts allowed, for obvious archiving issues ;)

NOTE: Please use "your name, the title of your project, the year" as page name.

Description

350 words including aims of the theoretical and practical research as well as its outcome.

Media

Photos

  • At least 2, Max 5.
  • native resolution only (that is the highest resolution you have for your photo and whatever resolution if you make screencaps)
  • PNG format

Video

optional unless the final outcome of the project, or one of its main components, is a video/film/animation.

  • allowed containers/codecs combos:
    • WebM (preferred):
      • Video codec: VP8 (3-5 Mbps data rate)
      • Audio codec: Vorbis (-q 6)
    • Ogg:
      • Video codec: Theora (3-5 Mbps data rate)
      • Audio codec: Vorbis (-q 6)
    • MP4:
      • Video Codec: H.264 (3-5 Mbps data rate)
      • Audio Codec: AAC (160kbps or 384kbps if 5.1) or MP3 (-V0 or -b 320)
  • resolution: 720p if source >= 720p, native resolution otherwise, progressive.
  • FPS: 24, 25, 30.
  • Sample rate:
    • 44.1kHz if source is 44.1kHz or 88.2kHz
    • 48 kHz if source is 48kHz or 96kHz
    • 44.1 kHz for everything else.

Audio

optional unless the final outcome of the project, or one of its main components, is a sound piece/track.

  • allowed containers/codecs combos:
    • Ogg: Vorbis (-q 6) preferred
    • MPEG: MP3 (-V0 or -b 320)
    • FLAC (-8)
  • Sample rate:
    • 44.1kHz if source is 44.1kHz or 88.2kHz
    • 48 kHz if source is 48kHz or 96kHz
    • 44.1 kHz for everything else.
  • Do not transcode! For instance, if the sound generated is directly an MP3, do not re-encode it with the settings above or with a different codec. Only encode original uncompressed or lossless compressed sources.

Essay

Abstract and bibs/ref + link to PDF (PDF must be uploaded to wiki).
Use Steve's recommendations for abstract length and bibliographic style.

texts thematic

Michel Gondry

You’ll like this film because you’re in it: the be kind rewind protocol.

Gondry starts with telling us about his utopian idea of communities making their own movies. And what he in the end creates is his utopian idea. Gondry states that he needed to make all the rules and sets in order to leave and create more space for the actual creative filmmaking. The participants otherwise didn’t know what to do or how to start. Through his protocol a group would collectively make a film whereas in Hollywood al the decisions are made by the director, Gondry explains (although I think that a producer has also al lot of influence, why otherwise al the director cuts on DVDs?). But isn’t Gondry, on a Meta level, not the director of all the movies created within the gallery space? Through his protocol there is not much space for experiment or different forms of filmmaking other than the by Gondry dictated Hollywood’s way. The whole project eventually has not so much to do with creativity but rather more with giving a work process for a community to make a film. It is the community who needs the rules not the creativity.


Additional Information

optional

  • Project URL (if lives on an external site)
  • extra wiki links (in case you have relevant notes/journals/documentation in your User: page, this is useful particularly if you have been asked to articulate further or refine your project during your assessment)
  • Animated GIFs