User:Kim/reading/The Laurence Rassel Show: Difference between revisions
(→4) |
(→4) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
'''Free licenses''' are not bad per se, but just not the solution to licensing problem (which they are bringing on) because they attune to the same principles. | '''Free licenses''' are not bad per se, but just not the solution to licensing problem (which they are bringing on) because they attune to the same principles. | ||
Terre | |||
<blockquote> | |||
Okay, I believe this constitutes a legal verbal contract, so we'll stop recording right now. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
== 5 == | == 5 == | ||
Revision as of 08:15, 31 October 2024
by Laurence Rassel and Terre Thaemlitz
on Terre's website
Excerpt Mix
2
Laurence Rassel operates anonymously as "critical rejection of systems of authorship" which "are inseparable from the troubles of patriarchy"
Between the death of her invisibility, a feminist assassination of the patriarchal Author figure ... .
3
A special message from Joan Smith (FROM “MORALITIES: SEX, MONEY AND POWER IN THE 21ST CENTURY”)
18th century as age of privatization of land an bodies. process of enclosure --> primarily womens bodies (controlling birth without birth control)
4
Nicholas
So basically yes, this is a kind of legal fiction.
Laurence
Imagine we have pure, cleared, original, new material ... .
Free licenses are not bad per se, but just not the solution to licensing problem (which they are bringing on) because they attune to the same principles.
Terre
Okay, I believe this constitutes a legal verbal contract, so we'll stop recording right now.