User:Eleanorg/1.2/Integrated assessment: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==wuestions from integrated assessment==
* "Redundancy is essential to an archive" - necessity of having multiples, back-ups. So 'fragility' of the image is a bit naive. Nice idea of 'embracing redundancy' in opposition to traditional computer science quest to get rid of redundancy. Should people host overlapping sections of the image instead of just 1 pixel?
* Why make basic unit 1 pixel? Wouldn't it be interesting to push ppl's boundaries, ask them how many pixels they'd be willing to host?
* What is more important - issue of censorship or issue of solidarity? (answer - censorship is a way into solidarity)
[http://pzwart3.wdka.hro.nl/~egreenhalgh/cgi-bin/pixelScrape/showImage.cgi Adopt a pixel here!]
[http://pzwart3.wdka.hro.nl/~egreenhalgh/cgi-bin/pixelScrape/showImage.cgi Adopt a pixel here!]
* [[User:Eleanorg/1.2/Thematic/Halfway Presentation | Presentation wiki page]]
* [[User:Eleanorg/1.2/Thematic/Halfway Presentation | Presentation wiki page]]

Revision as of 16:25, 3 April 2012

wuestions from integrated assessment

  • "Redundancy is essential to an archive" - necessity of having multiples, back-ups. So 'fragility' of the image is a bit naive. Nice idea of 'embracing redundancy' in opposition to traditional computer science quest to get rid of redundancy. Should people host overlapping sections of the image instead of just 1 pixel?
  • Why make basic unit 1 pixel? Wouldn't it be interesting to push ppl's boundaries, ask them how many pixels they'd be willing to host?
  • What is more important - issue of censorship or issue of solidarity? (answer - censorship is a way into solidarity)


Adopt a pixel here!

Misc