User:Kim/reading/Problems of Notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* can FLOSS counteract? | * can FLOSS counteract? | ||
* problems with FLOSS: | * problems with FLOSS: | ||
:* issue of collaboration and legislation | :* issue of collaboration and legislation (and how these relate to medium code) | ||
:* FLOSS emerging cultural practices fail to relate to outside (non-FLOSS art/ culture) | |||
::* these practices are not '''collaborative but distributive''' | |||
[https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/6086/AIM-239.pdf HAKMEM] | [https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/6086/AIM-239.pdf HAKMEM] | ||
[https://www.are.na/block/28634508 Tortoises?] | [https://www.are.na/block/28634508 Tortoises?] | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 15 September 2024
All Problems of Notation Will be Solved by the Masses: Free Open Form Performance, Free/Libre Open Source Software, and Distributive Practice
Simon Yuill
- recent valorization of 'collaboration' omits basic condition of collaboration - that all forms of production ultimately rely on various degrees and arrangements
- 'collaboration' becomes commodified (art, consumer as worker)
- can FLOSS counteract?
- problems with FLOSS:
- issue of collaboration and legislation (and how these relate to medium code)
- FLOSS emerging cultural practices fail to relate to outside (non-FLOSS art/ culture)
- these practices are not collaborative but distributive