((in)ter)dependence/Communities of Practise: Difference between revisions
(Add interdependence category tag) |
(Start 'paraphrasing' from Susan Leigh Star text) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Appears ''Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology'' (Susan Leigh Star, 2015, find it [https://hub.xpub.nl/bootleglibrary/book/863 here on the bootleg library]), that builds on the concept from ''Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation'' (Lave and Wenger, 1992). | |||
A community of practise... | |||
... is composed of people and things, | |||
themselves in ecological relation, | |||
with numbers of representations | |||
and signals, and ways of working | |||
... as a term emphasizes the ways in which people work together and act together to form communities | |||
... is a way of talking about a linked web of actions, people, and artifacts | |||
Objects in a community of practise... | |||
... come to be only in the context and action and use | |||
... exhibit a level of familiarity, 'taken-for-grantedness' | |||
... are on a trajectory of naturalization | |||
-- the removal of contingencies of an object's creation and its situated nature | |||
-- that has elements of ambiguity and duration | |||
-> it is not predetermined an object wil ever become naturalized or how long it will remain so | |||
People in a community of practise... | |||
... are considered 'newcomer' | |||
not through their relation with other people in the community | |||
but through their relation with the objects in the community | |||
... are on a trajectory of membership | |||
(which ranges from illegitimate peripheral participation | |||
to full membership) | |||
that consists of a series of encounters with the objects in the community | |||
and increasingly being in a naturalized relationship with them | |||
[[Category:((in)ter)dependence]] | [[Category:((in)ter)dependence]] |
Revision as of 12:53, 31 January 2024
Appears Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology (Susan Leigh Star, 2015, find it here on the bootleg library), that builds on the concept from Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Lave and Wenger, 1992).
A community of practise... ... is composed of people and things, themselves in ecological relation, with numbers of representations and signals, and ways of working ... as a term emphasizes the ways in which people work together and act together to form communities ... is a way of talking about a linked web of actions, people, and artifacts
Objects in a community of practise... ... come to be only in the context and action and use ... exhibit a level of familiarity, 'taken-for-grantedness' ... are on a trajectory of naturalization -- the removal of contingencies of an object's creation and its situated nature -- that has elements of ambiguity and duration -> it is not predetermined an object wil ever become naturalized or how long it will remain so
People in a community of practise... ... are considered 'newcomer' not through their relation with other people in the community but through their relation with the objects in the community ... are on a trajectory of membership (which ranges from illegitimate peripheral participation to full membership) that consists of a series of encounters with the objects in the community and increasingly being in a naturalized relationship with them