Nami-thesis outline: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<b>2. Main mechanisms of navigation on the web (main movements/behaviours of users)</b><br> | <b>2. Main mechanisms of navigation on the web (main movements/behaviours of users)</b><br> | ||
1.1) Analysis mechanisms of Scrolling, Clicking, Typing, Hovering, Dragging in existing webpages like Expedia, hotels.com, The New York Times, Google, DuckDuckGo..etc (pros and cons) (these target webpages can be changed. At the moment it’s not super clear.)<br> | 1.1) Analysis mechanisms of Scrolling, Clicking, Typing, Hovering, Dragging in existing webpages like Expedia, hotels.com, The New York Times, Google, DuckDuckGo..etc (pros and cons) (these target webpages can be changed. At the moment it’s not super clear.)<br> | ||
1.2) <br> | 1.2) <br><br> | ||
<b>3. A suggestion for alternative web navigation to emancipate</b><br> | <b>3. A suggestion for alternative web navigation to emancipate</b><br> | ||
Revision as of 17:04, 3 November 2021
Thesis Outline
Abstract
This thesis will be an essay throughout analysis of navigation agendas in commonly used in current web design practice and experiments of designing and testing alternative navigating suggestions to users(?) and UI/UX designers.
Contents
1. User autonomy in experiences on web context
1.1) Difference between Behavior and Action in a digital context
1.2) Critical point of mine about users being passive (+ Efficiency orient agenda is always fine?)
1.3) Is that a sharable matter? (survey and analyse the result)
2. Main mechanisms of navigation on the web (main movements/behaviours of users)
1.1) Analysis mechanisms of Scrolling, Clicking, Typing, Hovering, Dragging in existing webpages like Expedia, hotels.com, The New York Times, Google, DuckDuckGo..etc (pros and cons) (these target webpages can be changed. At the moment it’s not super clear.)
1.2)
3. A suggestion for alternative web navigation to emancipate
3.1) analysis + test
3.2) still some fallbacks..?
Conclusion