User:Zpalomagar/THESIS OUTLINE/FIFTH DRAFT

FIFTH DRAFT

>>>>>>THIS VERSION IS STIL UNDER CONSTRUCTION<<<<<<

America invertida - Joaquin Torres

CARTOGRAPHIES OF INVISIBILITY

Format: An analytical essay exploring theoretical, historical and critical approaches to counter.cartographies.

Key Topics: Counter cartographies, collaborative practices, Community mapping, crowdsourcing, re-publishing maps and cartographies, map visual language, diagrams

I. Introduction

Background

FROM COLONIALISM TO TECH-REPRESENTATIONS

Cartographies have broadly been understood as an instrument of power and domination. They define the territory, draw its borders and resources and consolidate the power of economic blocks. Societies have been oppressed by maps converting them in victims of a representation that define how they have to live. Maps have frequently been related to technical and reliable knowledge, realities represented in cartographies are mainly considered true, but the scientific objectivity of the maps should be questioned, as well as their intentions. They appear to be supposedly neutral to hide their real interests (Mesquita, 2016).

Maps have had a crucial role in the history of colonialism. They have been used to order and dominate the colonizers over the colonized. Furthermore, they are considered an institutionalised practice that implied legitimisation of territories. Indigenous communities developed their own cartographies to put themselves in the maps and to defend their lands and rights. More indigenous territory has been claimed by maps than by guns. (Nietschmann, 1995). These communities started to reverse maps representation visualising their resistance and claims. Indigenous cartography was an important inspiration tool for non-hegemonic worldviews and emancipatory practices.

This critical approach to cartographies, deconstructing traditional maps and diagrams have been explored by artist, architects, designers and activist in the post-colonial era. In 1943, “America Invertida” from Joaquin Torres, revindicated under the slogan “The south is our north”, the intention of challenging the conventionalism in map-making. Since then, alternative cartographies have been a huge area of exploration as socio-political communication tools for artist like Öyvind Fahlström who represented geopolitical tensions of the Cold War and changes of capitalism or Mark Lombardi who visualised global political and economic networks. In the ’80s Nancy Peluso introduced a specific terminology for community mapping: “Counter- cartographies” to explore how maps could be used by communities to represent themselves and stake claims to resources.

When internet globalization exploded worldwide a new range of possibilities opened up with digital communication, which has played an essential role in the development of counter cartographies and the process of collaborative making, collection of data and representation. The Internet has also generated new formats of online claims like data activism (Dataviz activism - Market café magazine) or Hashtag protests (#Metoo). This digital era also brings abundant tools that allow map-making more accessible to people and give more possibilities for cartographic representation. Nevertheless, digital tools also imply restriction of representation when working with visual and graphic language like algorithm oppression (Ramón Amaro), western supremacy in digital representation and default hierarchical structures in visual diagramming. Therefore, we need to have a critical approach when creating a visual representation in the digital era.

Precisely because maps are powerful tools to communicate, It is necessary to keep questioning and reinterpreting them to make sure they are still useful, and always rethink which one is the best representation for societies. Radical cartographies are necessary tools to fill information gaps and to put vulnerable communities in maps and data sets. There is a need for developing “science with people” rather than for people, specially in those fields characterised by “ irreducible uncertainties and ethical complexities ( Funtowicz & Ravetz 1994).

Statement

Diagrams, cartographies and maps can be transformed into socio-political communication tools which empower communities and give visibility to their common interests, revealing invisible realities and making the reader raise awareness about social crisis. This mechanism challenge the traditional storytelling of cartographies becoming a collaborative design instrument that spread knowledge through alternative map-making processes.

II. Body of thesis

CHAPTER 1: ANATOMY OF COUNTER CARTOGRAPHIES: Elements, protocols and communicative strategies behind them. [2000 words]

• POINT A: The production of counter-maps break the standard rules in the process of map-making. It develops its own codes creating disobedient cartographies. The rule is there are no rules.
  • Deconstructing the world map. Mercator projection is not the default geographic reference. Lewis Carroll Anti-Mercator Poem and Empty Map, Surrealist World Map 1929.
  • Counter maps are inaccurate cartographies, not technical. Traditionally, maps have been recognized as reliable elements but the information transmitted there does not have to be real. Alfred Korzybsky: “The map is not the territory” the language create a map used by people to represent the reality that is perceived.
  • Freedom of reading: Where is the starting point?. Challenge traditional storytelling and hierarchies in visual representation. Jan Tschichold: “As a rule, we no longer read quietly line by line but glance quickly over the whole, and only if our interests are awakened do the study in detail”.
    
    
• POINT B: Counter-cartographies create an alternative grammar of visual representation, challenging conventionalism in visual representation and decomposing complexities through a global language that allows better dissemination and understanding of these documents.
  • Popularised information with Isotypes: Otto Neurath & Gerd arntz (German Museum of War Economy). 
  • Alternative graphic protocols are created in order to envision misrepresented phenomenon which don't have a obvious visual translation. Filling gaps in visual representation. Pictographic Grammar (Bureau d’Études- Non-visual conventions).
  • Pictograms for collective mapping - Iconoclasistas.
    
    
• POINT C: Radical cartographies are maps converted into advertising elements in which attention calls and references to the reader are made straightaway.Counter-maps are not intended for a technical and specialized public but understood as a powerful element to be propagated among a wide range of communities.
  • Slogans/ Call for action: Cartographies as advertising.
  • Diagrams and maps are aesthetic objects between art, architecture, activism and design , beauty is a strong persuasive strategy in counter cartographies (Map art/ Data art). Mark Lombardi, Öyvind Fahlström. 
  • Identity mirror. Communities feel identifies and represented with design elements. Iconoclasistas - Who owns the land?

CHAPTER 2: THE POWER OF COLLABORATIVE MAPPING: Crowdsourcing practices as a technique to build democratic cartographies. [2000 words]

• POINT A: Crowdsourced processes are the basis of the elaboration of democratic datasets based on people claims and realities and not in bureaucratic and political protocols.
  • Why to contribute: Idealism or local need?. James Surowiecki - Wisdom of crowds. The most reliable sources of local information are the communities of a certain area (Communities VS Big data).
  • Unavailability of information: Filling data gaps. The supremacy of western data. Missing maps platform. Bourj Al Shamali's maps (organisation that don’t share the maps with the citizens. Google maps blurry areas. Data borders.
  • Digital tools have a crucial role in Collaborative processes. Availability of use of GIS - PPGIS ( Public Participation GIS). OSM (Open Street Map) - Toolbox for digital representation.
    
    
• POINT B: The process of community mapping is a mechanism to create communities around a common interest having inclusion, transparency and empowerment values as connections among participants.
  • Create local communities through maps: Parish mapping (more 1000 communities in UK linked to maps); The Green Map System (a global eco-cultural movement energised by local knowledge, action and responsibility).
  • Mapathon - session for collective mapping and community making online.
    
    
• POINT C: The production of counter cartographies is not limited to experts but it expands to the rest of the people willing to contribute, you can be an occasional cartographer.
  • Workshop as laboratory: Iconoclasistas, A new social cartography in the Amazon.
  • Mapping for Human rights: Amnesty international open letter how to map for Human rights
  • Manuals for community mapping (DIY): Manual for collective mapping - Iconoclasistas; Making maps: A visual guide to Map Design for GIS - John Krygier and Denis Wood. Illustrated guide for Ballon mapping

CHAPTER 3: SHARING RADICAL MAPS WITH PEOPLE, GIVING THEIR KNOWLEDGE BACK!: Post digital strategies for re-publishing cartographies. [2000 words]

• POINT A: The publication of counter-cartographies have socio-political ambitions and motivations, which are understood as a basis for transforming these design elements in tools to build better societies.
  • Political pressure. Mapping sexual harassment in Egypt.
  • Calls for action / create a social movement. Community gardens maps NYC.
  • Didactic. Protest map, Cartoon and propaganda.
  • Critique. Uneven digital geographies project.
• POINT B: The diffusion of experimental cartographies must challenge overwhelming digital media and look for other alternative mediums through which to connect with the audience. Are physical supports Post-digital mediums to spread cartographic knowledge?
  • Make it part of the city: Mural Anti eviction map, Knitted Flood Wall.
  • Experimental narratives: Lize Mogel - Performing infrastructure, Political poetic session - Anti eviction maps.
  • Self-printing diagrams: Political action maps in Germany.
• POINT C: Cartographies became more powerful when they are published in collections allowing the reader find interconnections across space and time (Radical Atlas).
  • Unfinished collection, ongoing publication. Individual maps has limitation of information, Atlas not
  • Some Collections of maps: Ej Atlas, An Atlas of radical cartography, Anti-Eviction Atlas, This is not an Atlas
  • This is not an Atlas, is an Atlas
• POINT D: The diffusion of radical cartographies it's an open access publication, the information that is represented pursue a common good so being faithful to its own objective must be accessible to as many people as possible
  • Creative Commons license. Reappropriation, reproduction and redefinition of maps.
  • Streaming cartographic publications. Always available, always updated. Mapping safe passages project.
  • Anti-counter cartographies: the other side of open access. When companies appropriate collective mapping processes to have profit.

III. Conclusion

Summarize the main points.
Make a strong/ memorable final statement: For centuries cartographies had been defined by state and domination and now the reflect individuals’ voices. Thanks to technology and collaborative tools this process is currently accessible to many more people and practised to fight for the defence of people's rights.