User:)biyibiyibiyi(/RW&RM 04/proposal 0 1 0

What do you want to make?

I propose to produce a series of tutorials, manuals, blogs, and hacked objects within the context of DIY networking. Grass root DIY networking has been an topic of interest during the last fifteen years in Europe and North America, as a response towards pathologies of the modern networked world, such as opacity of network infrastructure and asymmetry of power between network monopolies and users (Dragona & Charitos, 2017). The building and facilitation of DIY networks utilize Free/Libre Open Source Software (F/LOSS) tools and adhere to its core principles of freedom to use, modify and redistribute. As F/LOSS advocate for radical openness and promise a democratic model of collaborative framework, certain barriers remain visible, such as low participating rate of female contributors, technical barriers for laypersons, and meritocracy within the system (Nafus, 2011). The writing of technical textual mediums of tutorials and manuals tend to imply these hindrances as well. While these textual mediums tend to be plain, instructive and serve as textual interfaces for participants to be able to utilize and modify the tools and hold discussions around the community, the sociality of these textual medium are often undermined. The expression “RTFM”, Read the F*** Manual illustrates an example of disassociation of caring social relationship between the creator and users (Nafus, 2011). My project attempt to re-investigate the role of textual mediums within DIY/DIWO networking projects. I want to emphasize the participatory potentials of technical textual mediums. I see technical textual mediums as sites to share, invite, interject discourses despite of participants' varied technical skills; through these reciprocal actions, the social dimension of technical texts can be amplified, and facilitate environment for further critical collective making.

How do you plan to make it?

The re-investigation of tutorials, manuals, blogs happens within three types of circulation process. Within the first process, I identify myself as the ignorant user. While trying to set up networks myself, I am in a perpetual state of encountering frustrations reading technical documentation. Upon identifying a technical difficulty, I try to make my frustration visible by contacting the source creator, or other members within the community who are more technically more knowledgeable. I identify this process not only as knowledge transfer process from technically abled to the less abled, but also a process of making public what are the aspects that hinder user from participating in open source collaborative networking.

The second process involves rewriting of the technical texts based on my experiences. In the process of rewriting, I want to address the context within which I perform technical instructions. These contexts are social, cultural and political. The purpose of situating technical instruction within social, cultural and political contexts is to create space to have discourses around technology unlimited to technical lingos.

The third process invite collective reflection by collective writing. As DIY/DIWO networking is a collective process, participants share common interests and objectives, at the same time differ in their individualities. Collective writing invites participants within the network to to share their individual experiences and make consensus on maintaining and facilitating the network.

What is your time table?

During October, I will continue on developing Channel Channel project. I am at the phase of writing tutorials and DIY kits for home brew VPN. Meanwhile, I am identifying aspects of the textual implication of tutorials that account toward experimental publishing. I am also experimenting with building a distributive VPN network based on P2P infrastructure. I hope to try the distributive network first on VPS. During the process of setting up the network I would like to identify and draft textual basis for the network, such codes of conduct and manifesto. Similar to treating the writing of tutorial as a form a experimental publishing.

In November, I will focus on researching the history of networking and DIY counter culture. I would like to integrate historical information of networking into the writing of technical textual mediums, as historical insight inform readers how layers of networking come into the present state, and inform contemporary practices of DIY networking. The scope of the research is within lineage of protocols, infrastructure and network, such as TCP/IP, Usenet and ARPANET; and ascendance of DIY counter culture in the hacktivist community such as of Computer Lib and Homebrew Computer Club.

In December, I want to work on synthesizing the research on networking history and DIY counter culture organically.

In January, I would like to invite users to test the distributive network I built. I still need to identify potential users. The feedback will in turn influence how I develop the mode of address of tutorials, kits and blogs.

In February and March, I want to focus on synthesizing my thesis and put forward a convincing argument concentrating on these topics: the social potentials of textual mediums in collaborative networking practice and integration of network history and DIY counter culture history to shed light to contemporary practice.

In April, May and June, I want to focus on building prototypes that manifest the aforementioned ideas. They will be published as stated in the beginning of my proposal. They will be published in distributive formats of tutorials, user manuals, and blog entries. The publication should indicate clear intention to contextualize and playfully explore the writing of these formats, therefore challenging hackneyed interpretations of technical tutorial and user manual as decontextualized and universal instructions.

why do you want to make it?

I intend to manifest my motivation of conducting this project in a Speculations toward Decentralization.

• To decentralize is to collaborate. As the resources and tools are decentralize and demystified, collaboration can happens on a non-hegemonic model, as opposed to supervisor / subordinate hierarchy. Within decentralized collaborative organization, workers take charge of the organization and retain flexibility for their individualism to make productive collaboration possible.

• To decentralize is to offer porosity. Challenging the vertical organization structure, a porous organization body is composed by divisions which relationships are dynamic and unfixed. Porosity allow communication and inspirations to happen between divisions.

• To decentralize is to corroborate. Centralized modes of organization produce homogeneity and prone to vulnerability. Decentralizing practices offer diversity in the ecosystem, making the ecosystem a robust one, rich with variations.

• To decentralize is to stanch. Centralization had left vulnerabilities and loopholes to society. To decentralize is to use decentralization's flexibility and promptness to amend to the vulnerabilities and loopholes.

• To decentralize is to speculate. Centralization allocates no space to speculate new social imaginaries. Decentralization welcomes speculating and contesting practices.

• To decentralize is to combat imperialism, colonialism and orientalism. The global inequality today are remnants from past legacies of hegemonic regimes and ideologies. Decentralizing tools force away the power from the authority and pass it the mass, empowering voices of the unheard. The empowerment of the marginalized and under-represented shakes the residual of these power structure, cultural and perspectival bias that had caused pain and suffering.

• To decentralize is to expose. Centralization conceal system's intention and is manipulative in its operations. Decentralization retain transparency to its objects and intentions.

• To decentralize is to localize and contextualize. Decentralizing practices happen in context in their localities, challenging uniform and decontextualized forms of organization. Local contexts add social and cultural layers to collaborations, which are held as unique.

• To decentralize is to play. Centralization posit high costs for tinkering and system failures. Decentralization allow playfulness and conviviality in experimentation.

• To decentralize is to dismantle privileges. Centralization is the congregation of wealth of privileges in disproportionate number of authorities. Decentralization makes accessible and transparent of resources, providing access to under-privileged.

• To decentralize is to temporalize. The rights to determine experience and materialization of time in hierarchical structures are not held in our hands. To decentralize allow us to experience the manifestation of time at our decision and will.

Who can help you and how?

Relation to previous practice

Relation to larger context