User:Simon/Annotation typologies: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
ANNOTATION *  
ANNOTATION *  
ASTERISK *  
ASTERISK *  
 
BOOK PRICE *
BOOK PRICE<br>
BOOKMARK *
 
CIRCLED TEXT *
BOOKMARK<br>
CREASED PAGE *
 
CROSS *
CIRCLED TEXT<br>
DEAD ANT *
 
DOG-EAR *
CREASED PAGE<br>
ERASER RUBBING *
 
ERRATA *
CROSS<br>
FINGERPRINT *
 
FOLD *
DEAD ANT<br>
HANDWRITTEN LETTER *
 
INK BLOT *
DOG-EAR<br>
LIBRARY DOCUMENT *
 
LIFTED PRINT *
ERASER RUBBING<br>
LINE *
 
LOOSE PAGE *
ERRATA<br>
NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK *
 
NOTES *
FINGERPRINT<br>
PAGES REMOVED *
 
POST-IT NOTE *
FOLD<br>
RECEIPT BOOKMARK *
 
REPLACED IMAGE *
HANDWRITTEN LETTER<br>
SCUFF *
 
SMUDGE *
INK BLOT<br>
SQUIGGLE *
 
STAIN *
LIBRARY DOCUMENT<br>
STRIKETHROUGH *
 
TICK *
LIFTED PRINT<br>
TORN PAGE *
 
TORN PAPER BOOKMARK *
LINE<br>
UNDERLINING *
 
WARPED PAGE *
LOOSE PAGE<br>
 
NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK<br>
 
NOTES<br>
 
PAGES REMOVED<br>
 
POST-IT NOTE<br>
 
RECEIPT BOOKMARK<br>
 
REPLACED IMAGE<br>
 
SCUFF<br>
 
SMUDGE<br>
 
SQUIGGLE<br>
 
STAIN<br>
 
STRIKETHROUGH<br>
 
TICK<br>
 
TORN PAGE<br>
 
TORN PAPER BOOKMARK<br>
 
UNDERLINING<br>
 
WARPED PAGE<br>
 
WEAR AND TEAR<br>
WEAR AND TEAR<br>


These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach.
These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach.

Revision as of 10:06, 1 June 2019

Typologies identified from a previous project, which explored "marks of use" in books from a section of the State Library of Victoria.

http://simonbrowne.biz/projects/from-the-books-slv-rbrr-000-099/

ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR * ANNOTATION * ASTERISK * BOOK PRICE * BOOKMARK * CIRCLED TEXT * CREASED PAGE * CROSS * DEAD ANT * DOG-EAR * ERASER RUBBING * ERRATA * FINGERPRINT * FOLD * HANDWRITTEN LETTER * INK BLOT * LIBRARY DOCUMENT * LIFTED PRINT * LINE * LOOSE PAGE * NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK * NOTES * PAGES REMOVED * POST-IT NOTE * RECEIPT BOOKMARK * REPLACED IMAGE * SCUFF * SMUDGE * SQUIGGLE * STAIN * STRIKETHROUGH * TICK * TORN PAGE * TORN PAPER BOOKMARK * UNDERLINING * WARPED PAGE * WEAR AND TEAR

These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach. Problems that arose were linguistic - it was difficult assigning a word to an example as this already had some assumption of intention (e.g. a doodle as an intentional drawing vs squiggle as unintentional drawing).

thoughts and reflections

Whereas my previous approach was one of identification based on nouns, which presented problems. In a sense, to name something is to own it. Things become property much more easily than actions. Perhaps a different approach of identifying actions may be more open and associative than a noun-based classification scheme.