User:Simon/Reading, Writing & Research Methodologies SI9: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "==IFL introductions== Profiling shadow libraries: aaaaarg.fail, ubuweb & Project Gutenberg") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==IFL introductions== | ==IFL introductions== | ||
[[User:Simon/Profiling_shadow_libraries|Profiling shadow libraries: aaaaarg.fail, ubuweb & Project Gutenberg]] | [[User:Simon/Profiling_shadow_libraries|Profiling shadow libraries: aaaaarg.fail, ubuweb & Project Gutenberg]] | ||
==Annotations== | |||
How can annotation be useful to us, and a third party? | |||
Possible ways: | |||
Keep text and annotations together | |||
- scan and overlay transparencies (more like a graphical representation but perhaps not very readable) | |||
- write, re-write, cut and paste the annotations in a bigger paper all together | |||
- use the annotation bot (a digital tool)(it would be cool if you could underline, etc - yes! including graphic elements) | |||
- if digital, create the possibility to turn on and off the annotations to keep the original text | |||
- bind the pages into books and make a bootleg library with them | |||
Separate text and annotations (deconstruction / structure analysis) | |||
- only underlined text (in many ways: lines, circles, waves...) | |||
- list of questions, tags, notes + composition and mapping of them (different mapping techniques) | |||
- historical timeline | |||
- only drawings? | |||
- free graphical interpretation | |||
Computer driven annotation | |||
- scrape the text (words processing) | |||
- pattern recognition | |||
- delete all articles and implicit elements | |||
Combine the above possibilities | |||
- overlay of analog annotations to represent "heat patterns" (parts of the text with lots of/little engagement), as well as a digital version that is more legible | |||
HOW DO I KNOW WHAT I AM READING? We are discussing form how do we talk about content? | |||
How do you make the content readable for others? | |||
How do you communicate what you're interpreting? |
Revision as of 11:25, 9 July 2019
IFL introductions
Profiling shadow libraries: aaaaarg.fail, ubuweb & Project Gutenberg
Annotations
How can annotation be useful to us, and a third party?
Possible ways:
Keep text and annotations together
- scan and overlay transparencies (more like a graphical representation but perhaps not very readable)
- write, re-write, cut and paste the annotations in a bigger paper all together
- use the annotation bot (a digital tool)(it would be cool if you could underline, etc - yes! including graphic elements)
- if digital, create the possibility to turn on and off the annotations to keep the original text
- bind the pages into books and make a bootleg library with them
Separate text and annotations (deconstruction / structure analysis)
- only underlined text (in many ways: lines, circles, waves...)
- list of questions, tags, notes + composition and mapping of them (different mapping techniques)
- historical timeline
- only drawings?
- free graphical interpretation
Computer driven annotation
- scrape the text (words processing)
- pattern recognition
- delete all articles and implicit elements
Combine the above possibilities
- overlay of analog annotations to represent "heat patterns" (parts of the text with lots of/little engagement), as well as a digital version that is more legible
HOW DO I KNOW WHAT I AM READING? We are discussing form how do we talk about content?
How do you make the content readable for others?
How do you communicate what you're interpreting?