User:Tancre/readings/APrefaceToTransgression: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
Profanation without object, empty profanation that turn inward upon itself, bear on nothing but each other. World that no longer recognize any positive meaning in sacred (transgression?) <br>  
Profanation without object, empty profanation that turn inward upon itself, bear on nothing but each other. World that no longer recognize any positive meaning in sacred (transgression?) <br>  
Transgression as the sole manner to discover the pure sacred and a way to recompose its empty form, absence, through which becomes more scintillating. <br>  
Transgression as the sole manner to discover the pure sacred and a way to recompose its empty form, absence, through which becomes more scintillating. <br>  
Language from sexuality doesn't reveal secrets but that he exists without a God. We announce through ourselves that God is dead. All of our actions are addressed to this absence in a profanation that at once identifies it, dissipates it, exhausted itself in it and restore it to the empty purity of its transgression.
Language from sexuality doesn't reveal secrets but that he exists without a God. We announce through ourselves that God is dead. All of our actions are addressed to this absence in a profanation that at once identifies it, dissipates it, exhausted itself in it and restore it to the empty purity of its transgression. <br>
Modern sexuality as a superficial discourse of a natural animality, while obscurely addressing to Absence.  <small>''(Eponime – L'abbé C)''</small>

Revision as of 13:13, 27 September 2018

Notes on "A Preface To Transgression" (1963) by Michel Foucault


Christian world → main moment of natural understanding of sexuality through fallen bodies and sin.Tradition of mysticism and spirituality incapable to divide the continuous form of desire, rapture, penetration, ecstasy, that leave us spent. Experience that seems to lead to the heart of a divine love (outpouring and source returning upon itself)

Contemporary experience → regained the full truth of sexuality as a process of nature. Now it can emerge in the clear light of language.
What characterize the modern sexuality (from Sade to Freud) is not to have found the language of his logic but that through the violence of this language they have found an empty zone where it establish the limits of every form is bestowed upon it.

// Impossibility to give form to the language of sexuality, it shows always the limits of the language // Non rappresentational nature of sexuality

Sexuality points to nothing beyond itself, no prolongation except in a frenzy which disrupts it. No liberation of sexuality but we found its limit,
limit of consciousness, only reading of unconscious,
limit of the law, sole substance of universal taboos,
limit of language, it shows how much the language can advance in the sand of silence,
limit of ourselves, designate us as a limit VS basis of our isolation or individuality.

Only division possible in an empty world (objects, beings,spaces) to desecrate. Profanation without object, empty profanation that turn inward upon itself, bear on nothing but each other. World that no longer recognize any positive meaning in sacred (transgression?)
Transgression as the sole manner to discover the pure sacred and a way to recompose its empty form, absence, through which becomes more scintillating.
Language from sexuality doesn't reveal secrets but that he exists without a God. We announce through ourselves that God is dead. All of our actions are addressed to this absence in a profanation that at once identifies it, dissipates it, exhausted itself in it and restore it to the empty purity of its transgression.
Modern sexuality as a superficial discourse of a natural animality, while obscurely addressing to Absence. (Eponime – L'abbé C)