Talk:Thematic-Making It Public: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''Page dedicated to brainstorming, planning and preparation of the thematic''
''Page dedicated to brainstorming, planning and preparation of the thematic''


=Publication=


What has been done so far?


= To do =
What can be done?
* send email to all participants with their time.


=To Bring in=
Choose a work and produce a translation of it.
* @andre:
** audio recorder
** books


=Notes=
Next meeting we should be presented with a few translations. 
[[User:Castrobot/Making It Public-Notes]]


= Topics =


== Distribution Networks ==
==Jan 20==
MONDAY
* no translations
* start the epub from the report produced by steve.
* git rep
* is it something you want to do?
* https://github.com/pietzwart/making-it-public


10:00-11:30 Introduction Annet and Andre
* Making the epub from the translations and documentation


11:30-12:30 Aymeric Mansoux - ''Making it public for who? The limits of consensus in free culture access and distribution.''


12:30-13:30 Lunch break
== division of tasks==
* Natalya: content transformations from videos onto still images ( pixel scan) + code snipets
* Pleun: design 
* Colm: gathering and preface
* Samira: write, editor
* Nadine: coordinator
* Max: translation onto code
* Stone: content translation
* Julia: reflective text (TBA)
* Sara:


13:30-14:30 Amy Wu - ''Fanzines and underground networks of publications' distribution.''
==tools==
* Git
* Epub


14:30-15:00 Break


15:00-17:30 Practice


17:30-18:30 Dinner break
==Pleun - Index==
http://pzwart1.wdka.hro.nl/~pleun/makeitpublic/ 




18:30-22:30 Films
=Feedback=
==Stone==
* Not interested in topic. Finds little value in the format?
* Interested in design part, interested, similar to the web-design
* Working on a photobooks and non-the-less experimenting making epub


Introduction / comments by Martino Morandi (t.b.c.)
==Max==
* intense, long days (tiring)
* '''5 days''' could be more appropriate, since they allow the creating work, and for thoughts and work start to alignment
* interested in talks


Francoise Levie, The Man Who Wanted to Classify the World (2002) - 60 min
==Nadine==
* interesting the different perspectives on the same subject


Ben Lewis, Google and the World Brain (2012) - 90 min
==Colm== 
* topics for the days - titles, texts, talk - realizing how deep each threat of the topic helps.
* confuse: how far they should go? Would like the expected outcome was more clear from the beginning.


==Pleun==
* something happens when you go white far
* wish to have it every month


'''Pre-reading - for morning assignment'''
==natalya==
* look at an object like an epub - from something technical and practical, to a more experimental and exploratory object


Dick Hebdige, Subculture: the meaning of style (Chapter one, from culture to hegemony, pp.5-19)
==Julia==
http://www.erikclabaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/181899847-Subculture.pdf
* unsure about if 3 days or good, or should go long
* suspicious about the topic - everything around the topic was interesting
* was not clear where the connections were.  
* 3 days were about '''ways of doing''', rather than the content.


Ferdinand Tönnies, Community and Civil Society (Book one, the argument)
==Sara==
http://ebooks.cambridge.org/chapter.jsf?bid=CBO9780511816260&cid=CBO9780511816260A016&tabName=Chapter
* intense, but needed, specially after 1 month unemployment
* 1st impression was not of interest, but also because it was a foreign topic
* texts created interested
* pity to have not discussed the texts - since they are ways to process the rest of the readings and talks. Need to approach the text differently.
* Report (Steve) - as way of process
* work in groups and without hierarchies
* necessity for collective thinking -


Chantal Mouffe, Artistic Activism and Agnostic Spaces (2007)
==Annet==
http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/pdfs/mouffe.pdf
* necessary to work more with the students for the preparation phase. Talk them more on what to expect.
* guests - what did you feel?
* content - underestimated the context of the content.


* (students were not making the connections, being active withing the text)


'''GROUP: [please add your name]'''


1.


2.


3.
----
necessaity to prepare


4.




'''Pre-reading - for afternoon practice'''


From Print to Ebooks: a Hybrid Publishing Toolkit for the Arts http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/from-print-to-ebooks-a-hybrid-publishing-toolkit-for-the-arts/ http://networkcultures.org/digitalpublishing/
= To do =
* send email to all participants with their time.


=To Bring in=
* @andre:
** audio recorder
** books
** Film: "The Man Who Wanted to Classify the World"


'''Additional reading (not required, yet recommended)'''
= Planning =


Vannevar Bush. As We May Think. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/ [http://worrydream.com/refs/Bush%20-%20As%20We%20May%20Think%20%28Life%20Magazine%209-10-1945%29.pdf original article scan]
== Goals for the work sessions ==
* conceive and implement an electronic publication for the works developed under the context of the documentation project.
* discover the works, letting the works talk for themselves, before framing them 
* organize the works so that an entity (a narrative?) emerges from the publication 


Aymeric Mansoux. How Deep is Your Source. http://texts.bleu255.com/how-deep-is-your-source/
== (Possible) Task distribution for Publication ==


== Writing the Archive ==
=== Monday===  
TUESDAY


10:30-11:30 Introduction Annet and Andre
* Introduction to the Documentation project at MMDDC
* Introduction to Hybrid publishing


11:30-12:30 Sandra Fauconnier - Writing Wikimedia
* Documentation goals: publicity, funding, process
* Exploring the documentation materials and their different media( video, photography, text, print) -  
(As 1 single group OR 1 group per year for?)
* Exploring overlaps: funding + process for different purposes
* Strategies for digitizing off-line content
* Strategies for common and retrievable storage


12:30-13:30 Lunch break
=== Tuesday===
* the same groups as yesterday.


13:30-14:30  Michael Murtaugh - ''Active Archives;  Erkki Kurenniemi: In 2048''
Think about the output format the epub.


14:30-15:00 Break
Stipulate a goal for your publication.


15:00-17:30 Practice
Address the steps that you'll need to get there.


17:30-18:30 Dinner break
What will be the limitations?


18:30-20:30 Continue Practice


20:30-21:30 Films / shorts (t.b.c.)
Homework: Make a written summary  (1 paragraph ) of your publication.


Selection of interviews http://cdc.leuphana.com/structure/digital-cultures-research-lab/projects/dcrl-questions/




'''Pre-reading - for morning assignment'''
* division into 3 teams, each dealing respectively with: '''Source material''', '''publishing pipeline''',   '''Front-end design'''
* '''implement a prototype''' that puts into practice the necessary tasks


Geoff Cox, Nicolas Malevé, Michael Murtaugh, Archiving the Data-body: human and nonhuman agency in the documents of Kurenniemi. http://activearchives.org/wiki/Archiving_the_Data-body:_human_and_nonhuman_agency_in_the_documents_of_Kurenniemi
==== Groups and Tasks:====
<s>* Source material
** digitization
** storage and organization on the wiki
** context, information


Lori Emerson. Reading Writing Interface: from the digital to the bookbound. (Introduction, Chapter 4 - The Fascicle as Process and Product) (link soon)
* Publishing pipeline
** getting the content from storage (wiki) into its publishable form
** publishable format(s)
** translations necessary to represent works under the publishable format


Matthew Fuller, It looks like you're writing a letter: Microsoft, in: Behind the Blip. http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0009/msg00040.html
* Front-end design
** publishable format(s)
** identity of publication(s)
</s>


=== Wednesday:===
* Continue to work on Tuesday prototypes
* results, issues, questions
* elaborate a proposal a simple for the continuation of the work


'''GROUP: [please add your name]'''
== Reading groups ==
===Monday:===  
* conflict


1.
=== Tuesday:===
* the web &amp; algorythms as a writing technologies 


2.
===Wednesday===


3.


4.


 
=Notes=
'''Additional reading (not required, yet recommended)'''
[[User:Castrobot/Making It Public-Notes]]
 
Michel Foucault, What is an author? http://www.movementresearch.org/classesworkshops/melt/Foucault_WhatIsAnAuthor.pdf
 
Matthew Kirschenbaum, What Is an @uthor? https://lareviewofbooks.org/essay/uthor
 
 
== Digital & Hybrid Publishing ==
WEDNESDAY
 
10:30-11:30 Introduction Annet and Andre
 
11:30-12:30 Florian Cramer - ''Off-line digital reading'' (t.b.c.)
 
12:30-13:30 Lunch break
 
13:30-14:30 Pia Pool - ''Digital publishing for publishers''
 
14:30-15:00 Break
 
15:00-17:30 Practice
 
17:30-18:30 Dinner break
 
 
'''Pre-reading - for morning assignment'''
 
Katherine Hayles, Writing Machines (chapters 1,2,3) http://monoskop.org/images/b/bf/Hayles_N_Katherine_Writing_Machines.pdf
 
Johanna Drucker, The Century of Artists' Books.
( Chapters 1 - The artist's Book as Idea and Form, 7 - Self-reflexivity in book Form) 
[http://vubissmart.hro.nl/webopac/List.csp?SearchT1=The+century+of+artists%27+books&Index1=Index1&Database=2&Location=NoPreference&SearchMethod=Find_1&SearchTerm1=The+century+of+artists%27+books&OpacLanguage=dut&Profile=Default&EncodedRequest=*98d*A4*8D*D96*83*3A*E2*D5*F0*FB*A4*83j*5E&EncodedQuery=*98d*A4*8D*D96*83*3A*E2*D5*F0*FB*A4*83j*5E&Source=SysQR&PageType=Start&PreviousList=Level1&WebPageNr=1&NumberToRetrieve=50&WebAction=NewSearch&StartValue=0&RowRepeat=0&ExtraInfo=&SortIndex=Title&SortDirection=1&Resource=&SavingIndicator=&RestrType=&RestrTerms=&RestrShowAll=&LinkToIndex= in WdKA library]
 
 
'''GROUP: [please add your name]'''
 
1.
 
2.
 
3.
 
4.
 
 
'''Additional reading (not required, yet recommended)'''
 
Friedrich Kittler, Gramaphone, Film, Typewriter - chapter 3 Typewriter
 
Alessandro Ludovico Post-Digital Print. http://monoskop.org/images/a/a6/Ludovico%2C_Alessandro_-_Post-Digital_Print._The_Mutation_of_Publishing_Since_1894.pdf
 
Video: Books in Browsers 2014: Johanna Drucker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz9aELG8aQs
 
 
== Examples ==
 
Electronic Literature & Its Emerging Forms: http://dtc-wsuv.org/elit/elit-loc/works/
 
http://collection.eliterature.org/1/
http://collection.eliterature.org/2/
 
Silvio Lorusso, Post-Digital Publishing Archive: http://p-dpa.net/
 
I love e-Poetry: http://iloveepoetry.com/

Latest revision as of 10:51, 20 January 2016

Page dedicated to brainstorming, planning and preparation of the thematic

Publication

What has been done so far?

What can be done?

Choose a work and produce a translation of it.

Next meeting we should be presented with a few translations.


Jan 20

  • Making the epub from the translations and documentation


division of tasks

  • Natalya: content transformations from videos onto still images ( pixel scan) + code snipets
  • Pleun: design
  • Colm: gathering and preface
  • Samira: write, editor
  • Nadine: coordinator
  • Max: translation onto code
  • Stone: content translation
  • Julia: reflective text (TBA)
  • Sara:

tools

  • Git
  • Epub


Pleun - Index

http://pzwart1.wdka.hro.nl/~pleun/makeitpublic/


Feedback

Stone

  • Not interested in topic. Finds little value in the format?
  • Interested in design part, interested, similar to the web-design
  • Working on a photobooks and non-the-less experimenting making epub

Max

  • intense, long days (tiring)
  • 5 days could be more appropriate, since they allow the creating work, and for thoughts and work start to alignment
  • interested in talks

Nadine

  • interesting the different perspectives on the same subject

Colm

  • topics for the days - titles, texts, talk - realizing how deep each threat of the topic helps.
  • confuse: how far they should go? Would like the expected outcome was more clear from the beginning.

Pleun

  • something happens when you go white far
  • wish to have it every month

natalya

  • look at an object like an epub - from something technical and practical, to a more experimental and exploratory object

Julia

  • unsure about if 3 days or good, or should go long
  • suspicious about the topic - everything around the topic was interesting
  • was not clear where the connections were.
  • 3 days were about ways of doing, rather than the content.

Sara

  • intense, but needed, specially after 1 month unemployment
  • 1st impression was not of interest, but also because it was a foreign topic
  • texts created interested
  • pity to have not discussed the texts - since they are ways to process the rest of the readings and talks. Need to approach the text differently.
  • Report (Steve) - as way of process
  • work in groups and without hierarchies
  • necessity for collective thinking -

Annet

  • necessary to work more with the students for the preparation phase. Talk them more on what to expect.
  • guests - what did you feel?
  • content - underestimated the context of the content.
  • (students were not making the connections, being active withing the text)




necessaity to prepare



To do

  • send email to all participants with their time.

To Bring in

  • @andre:
    • audio recorder
    • books
    • Film: "The Man Who Wanted to Classify the World"

Planning

Goals for the work sessions

  • conceive and implement an electronic publication for the works developed under the context of the documentation project.
  • discover the works, letting the works talk for themselves, before framing them 
  • organize the works so that an entity (a narrative?) emerges from the publication 

(Possible) Task distribution for Publication

Monday

  • Introduction to the Documentation project at MMDDC
  • Introduction to Hybrid publishing
  • Documentation goals: publicity, funding, process
  • Exploring the documentation materials and their different media( video, photography, text, print) -

(As 1 single group OR 1 group per year for?)

  • Exploring overlaps: funding + process for different purposes
  • Strategies for digitizing off-line content
  • Strategies for common and retrievable storage

Tuesday

  • the same groups as yesterday.

Think about the output format the epub.

Stipulate a goal for your publication.

Address the steps that you'll need to get there.

What will be the limitations?


Homework: Make a written summary (1 paragraph ) of your publication.


  • division into 3 teams, each dealing respectively with: Source material, publishing pipeline,   Front-end design
  • implement a prototype that puts into practice the necessary tasks

Groups and Tasks:

* Source material

    • digitization
    • storage and organization on the wiki
    • context, information
  • Publishing pipeline
    • getting the content from storage (wiki) into its publishable form
    • publishable format(s)
    • translations necessary to represent works under the publishable format
  • Front-end design
    • publishable format(s)
    • identity of publication(s)

Wednesday:

  • Continue to work on Tuesday prototypes
  • results, issues, questions
  • elaborate a proposal a simple for the continuation of the work

Reading groups

===Monday:===  

  • conflict

Tuesday:

  • the web & algorythms as a writing technologies 

Wednesday

Notes

User:Castrobot/Making It Public-Notes