Assignment Zeeuws Museum: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
(Created page with "Inspiration from the Zeeuw Museum in Middelburg, Zeeland '''De Roeping van Mattheus''' by '''Marinus van Reymerswale''', so they think. I choose this painting because I was...")
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Inspiration from the Zeeuw Museum in Middelburg, Zeeland
[[File:Reactie_Zeeuw_Museum.pdf|thumb|200px|right|Reaction Zeeuws Museum]]
'''De Roeping van Mattheus''' by '''Marinus van Reymerswale''', so they think.
== Inspiration from the Zeeuw Museum in Middelburg, Zeeland '''De Roeping van Mattheus''' by '''Marinus van Reymerswale''' ==
 


I choose this painting because I was inspired by the story, the story before it gets to the museum. Before it was in 5 pieces of wood, painted. They restored it, but a lot of information got lost. In an interview what you can watch at the website (see link below), they could not confirm that Marinus really painted it. So is it an original or a copy? They couldn’t figure it out, but still they place the name of Marinus under need the painting. This got me questing, so with my work I want this question to get to the public. With this work, they can figure it out for them self of the work is an original or an copy. The five pieces stands for what the painting was before they restore it. Before the loss of curtain information.  
I choose this painting because I was inspired by the story, the story before it gets to the museum. Before it was in 5 pieces of wood, painted. They restored it, but a lot of information got lost. In an interview what you can watch at the website (see link below), they could not confirm that Marinus really painted it. So is it an original or a copy? They couldn’t figure it out, but still they place the name of Marinus under need the painting. This got me questing, so with my work I want this question to get to the public. With this work, they can figure it out for them self of the work is an original or an copy. The five pieces stands for what the painting was before they restore it. Before the loss of curtain information.  


[http://youtu.be/85vuXYTXV9o Interview: Is the painting a copy?]
[http://youtu.be/85vuXYTXV9o Interview: Is the painting a copy?]


[[File:De-roeping-van-mattheus-Marinus_van_Reymerswale.jpg|500px]] [[File:Tasten_in_het_Duister_2_-_Solange_Frankort.jpg|760px]]
[[File:De-roeping-van-mattheus-Marinus_van_Reymerswale.jpg|500px]] [[File:Tasten_in_het_Duister_2_-_Solange_Frankort.jpg|760px]]

Latest revision as of 20:31, 5 January 2015

Reaction Zeeuws Museum

Inspiration from the Zeeuw Museum in Middelburg, Zeeland De Roeping van Mattheus by Marinus van Reymerswale

I choose this painting because I was inspired by the story, the story before it gets to the museum. Before it was in 5 pieces of wood, painted. They restored it, but a lot of information got lost. In an interview what you can watch at the website (see link below), they could not confirm that Marinus really painted it. So is it an original or a copy? They couldn’t figure it out, but still they place the name of Marinus under need the painting. This got me questing, so with my work I want this question to get to the public. With this work, they can figure it out for them self of the work is an original or an copy. The five pieces stands for what the painting was before they restore it. Before the loss of curtain information.

Interview: Is the painting a copy?


De-roeping-van-mattheus-Marinus van Reymerswale.jpg Tasten in het Duister 2 - Solange Frankort.jpg