User:Chen Junyu/graduation/theise/project proposal/Notes for 1st Stage: Difference between revisions
Chen Junyu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Chen Junyu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Chapter1== | |||
art history and the history of media have always stood in an interdependent relationship and art has commented on,taken up or even promoted each new media developmet,the view of art history as media history ,as the history of this interdependent relationship that includes the role of artistic visions in the rise of new media of illusion, is still underdeveloped. art's close relationship to machines in particular and technology in general , including the mnew media of images and their distribution,spans all epochs,from classical antiquity to the present day. | |||
central argument : installing an observer in a hermetically closed-off image space of illusion did not make its first appearance with the technical invention of computer-aided VR . On the contrary, vr forms part of the core of the relationship of humans to images. it is grounded in art traditions, received scant attention up to now---was subject to the specfic media of their epoch,and used to transport content of a highly disparate nature. | |||
media that are the means whereby the eye is addressed with a totality of images. | |||
===='''Panorama'''====demands special consideration for 2 reasonsL 1, the illusion space represented the hightst developed form of illusionism and suggestive poewer of the problematical variety that used traditional methods of painting . 2 exemplary in that this effect was an intended one , a percalculated outcome of the application of technological, physiological and psychological knowledge. | |||
with the contemporary means at hand,1,it addressed the observer as directly a spossible,2,the study of the panorama can helpto lay the foundations of a systematic comparison. | |||
=========== | |||
interactive media have changed our idea of the image into one of a multisensory interactive space of experience with a time frame | |||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 1 November 2014
Chapter1
art history and the history of media have always stood in an interdependent relationship and art has commented on,taken up or even promoted each new media developmet,the view of art history as media history ,as the history of this interdependent relationship that includes the role of artistic visions in the rise of new media of illusion, is still underdeveloped. art's close relationship to machines in particular and technology in general , including the mnew media of images and their distribution,spans all epochs,from classical antiquity to the present day.
central argument : installing an observer in a hermetically closed-off image space of illusion did not make its first appearance with the technical invention of computer-aided VR . On the contrary, vr forms part of the core of the relationship of humans to images. it is grounded in art traditions, received scant attention up to now---was subject to the specfic media of their epoch,and used to transport content of a highly disparate nature.
media that are the means whereby the eye is addressed with a totality of images.
====Panorama====demands special consideration for 2 reasonsL 1, the illusion space represented the hightst developed form of illusionism and suggestive poewer of the problematical variety that used traditional methods of painting . 2 exemplary in that this effect was an intended one , a percalculated outcome of the application of technological, physiological and psychological knowledge.
with the contemporary means at hand,1,it addressed the observer as directly a spossible,2,the study of the panorama can helpto lay the foundations of a systematic comparison.
=
interactive media have changed our idea of the image into one of a multisensory interactive space of experience with a time frame