Lor.ensō/projectproposal

What do you want to make?

I want to experiment with /explore various ways of developing a method -> to make an infrastructure for countermapping / anti-campaigning.

To show (human) complications, tensions and miscalculations as a reaction towards the renders, city marketing and planning (as I describe). With stories and anecdotes I collected and search for ways of developing a platform constructive reflection

In this process I want (re)search for ways to visualize the tension. I.e. using drawing as an alternative to the hollow representation that 'shape'

Rotterdam.

The human touch as reminder of the (in)humane complications to discuss perspectives and to create a catalog of findings, perspectives

I would like to experiment with both face to face sessions with friends, family, but also with people online and offline.

Not only questions but also playing with 'anecdotal annotation',

A way / method, to showcase virtual/physical clashes with contexts and representations. Possibility is, a visual essay based on an inner/outer mono or dialogue I'm currently having considering the rendered imagery of Rotterdam used in both (simulator) games and future architectural concepts of Rotterdam. But also going out of my bubble and reflect on multiple views rather than only my personal render.

I have a couple of things I want to test. To make the 'methodology development' more tangible I will approach it as if were some sort of software or game with version controls.

V.0.0.1

How do you plan to make it?

Through organizing a set of sessions that could be comparable to the colloquium. but then inside of Rotterdam or at least with people that moved as well.

"Search for examples of city planning / marketing / maintenance of the city/village/township where you are from*" 
collect img / promises / memories 					                     
then....... 
ask yourself / eachother "how does -location- relate to you as the inhabitant*?"
aaand thennn  
ask yourself / eachother "how do you relate to -location-?"

I see that there would be a second colloquium coming up for the sake of concept development.

I want to explore various ways of collecting information, context and also ways to make things tangible.

[Collective Location Relation Annotation Session]

A continued version of before-mentioned collection and reflection. But then adding own element of the XYZ+T?

1. gather context and get either frustrated or inspired or in the best scenario both,
2. print out the imagery or text and annotate how this doesn't apply to the person getting into it.
3. develop this into a pamphlet / poster
4. share the stories behind the output

[reflective documentation, point out the bugs]

[drawing, editing, annotations, public, game]

[catalog]

Using the stories of people and they situations and creating character sets of it with human metadata.

In my thesis proposal I play with the 6 sides of the cube

Culturally - budgetcuts, false iconism, counterculture, grassroots, community, festivals/gigs/events

This cube will then transform into a dice and the contexts, problems, barriers will then turn into decks of cards.

It will all revolve around Rotterdam, using map tiles as playing field.

"Search for examples of city planning / marketing / maintenance of the city/village/township where you are from*" 
collect img / promises / memories 					                     
then....... 
ask yourself / eachother "how does -location- relate to you as the inhabitant*?"
aaand thennn  
ask yourself / eachother "how do you relate to -location-?"

I see that there would be a second colloquium coming up for the sake of concept development.

What is your timetable?

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\PHASE ONE //

September / October

• Read up on previously saved sources. Start sketching and writing thoughts down, collecting both sides.
• Research, attend lectures, visit exhibitions
• Try to zoom out a bit and make a colloquium based on 'location satisfactory' surveys municipalities often give
• Have a lot of discussions to get things clear and also give yourself time to digest.
• Colloquium: start developing a method for an infrastructure for countermapping / anti-campaigning.
• Start making a visual catalog

November:

• Public moment do a walk-in type deal and develop some sort of way to ask for contributions.
• Reflect on the colloquium & public moment, gather first ideas and ways to develop a method.
• 23 november: deliver project proposal ~ digest, organise, prepare presentation
• 27 november: pre-assessment
• Continue the catalog

December

• 1-7 December: Attend the Worksession: a Cane, Sticky notes, Another body, look for connections, insights, network
• 13 December Deadline First Chapter Thesis
• 17 December: Assessment
• Note crucial feedback -> Develop a new version for collective annotation
• Gather interests multiple groups and organize meetups
• Continue the catalog

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\PHASE TWO//

January

[ possibly change / restate things if assessments go other ways ]

• Start meetups - at least one with peers and one with outsiders
• Experiment with different sessions, gather contexts through new colloquiums
• Notes and developments

February / March

• Continue meetups: prototype the format -> dice + context decks + map
• Brainstorm / feedback with people
• Think about the outcomes: Tabletop Simulator / Physical Game
• Start sketching the potential outcomes: Dice, Cards, Map?: designs of thesis and outcome must align
• Notes and developments
• 14 March Deadline Second Draft thesis (texts to 2nd readers)  
• 8 March Deadlines Second readers' comments

April

• Continue meetups: test design
• Finetune
• Notes and development
• 18 April DEADLINE THESIS (0:00 hrs)

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\PHASE THREE//

May

• Finalize the dice, cards and map.
• Final test

June

• Final feedback and finetuning and deliver
• documentation
• Assessment
• Graduate

July

• Build up and present
  

Please include a timeline of which steps you will take and the order in which those things will be done, in other words, what needs to be done and when.

Why do you want to make it?

Describe your motivation for undertaking this project.

I am having mixed feelings about Rotterdam± the city I was born in. A city that has been suffering the second city syndrome for a while.

Being on the list of poorest, least healthy. Having some sort of bad reputation based on multiple elements. Then resulting into trying to develop a better city, getting on the list of cool cities. Developing gentrification and seeming to be more (inter)nationally appealing cities.

socially, accessibly, bureaucratically, architecturally, virtually, culturally

I am searching for a right way to visualize the tensions.  The human touch as reminder of the (in)humane complications.  I'm in confusion by the idea of vision / images of the city through virtual representation. Mostly, because I feel that is an image that lacks multiple layers of complex contexts:

Culturally - budgetcuts, false iconism, counterculture, grassroots, community, festivals/gigs/events

It is

Who can help you and how?

XPUB tutors/peers/alumni

.ZIP

Friends and Family

Open Call: anyone interested in / the people that want to participate.

The people in Gent during the worksession

People outside the bubble

List the people that could help you realise your project and how they could help you, in other words, the support you hope to receive.

Relation to previous practice

Describe how your research connects to previous projects you have done. Here you can use the descriptions you made during the Methods seminar or make new descriptions.

Bachelor works:

3D / Worldbuilding - The Monster of Albert Heijn / Happytalism / Concrete Desert

Video - How to enter the art academy with a Wheelchair

Design thinking: GENERATION Y?

XPUB

SI23

• PUBLIC TRANSPORT
• COUNTERMAPPING =BUGS OF MISCONDUCT
• Method(ol(atry)ogy) is a way of surviving experience
• /door/PORT

SI24

• ROTTERDAM 2040 / CybeRdam2077  - PolderPunk?
• --------Benchmarking-------
• poinxs (points of inaccess)
• Pedestrian / virtual walk
• Accessibility

Relation to a larger context

https://canvaswan.com/into-the-digital-cartographic-void

How not to be seen / Hito Steyerl

Constant workshop

Rotterdam is it happening

VERS BETON

ongezonde stad n andere lijsten

References

A list of references[1] used in the text supplemented with key works that are currently informing your practice.[2]

[1] As with your previous essays, the references need to be formatted according to the Harvard method.)

[2] Remember that dictionaries, encyclopedias and wikipedia are not references to be listed. These are starting points which should lead to more substantial texts and practices.)

3D CONTINUUM

https://volumetricregimes.xyz/index.php?title=The_Industrial_Continuum_of_3D

https://monoskop.org/images/0/04/Kittler_Friedrich_1996_The_City_Is_a_Medium.pdf

https://placesjournal.org/article/a-city-is-not-a-computer/

https://salvage.zone/salvaging-situationism-race-and-space/

Rene Boer - Smooth City

LASSE VAN DEN BOSCH CHRISTENSEN - I, FOR ONE, WELCOME OUR NEW OVERLORDS

additions±

CANVAS WAN - Into the digital void

JESSE SIEGEL - DEFAULT ALPHA

Mariken OVerdijk / The city as anthology: movements at the margins of public space

How Not To Be Seen

https://www.notbored.org/UU.html

FLANEUR CRITICISM [https://salvage.zone/salvaging-situationism-race-and-space/](https://salvage.zone/salvaging-situationism-race-and-space/)

VERS BETON

http://www.rechtopdestad.nl/