User:C3/Research: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
=='''p̸r̸o̴t̴o̵t̵y̸p̴i̸n̶g̴ ̶n̷e̶w̴ ̴e̴d̸u̷c̶a̷t̷i̷o̷n̷?̴'''== | =='''p̸r̸o̴t̴o̵t̵y̸p̴i̸n̶g̴ ̶n̷e̶w̴ ̴e̴d̸u̷c̶a̷t̷i̷o̷n̷?̴'''== | ||
I would be interested in making crash tests in the form of talks/workshops/whatever aimed at trying to bridge the gap between people and computers (technology in general maybe). Computer literacy might be the term that refers to this, by the way, I know that people think that they don't need this at all, that [https://sub.davidoreilly.com/p/the-push-of-a-button pushing a button] is all they need to get trough contemporary life, but I argue that since more and more aspects of life itself get platformed (meaning, they get "digitalized") learning general knowledge of how technology operates can help prevent black box magic and create the base for agency development of the individual (which hopefully then spreads it).<br> | |||
How to do all of this? Well, I think that I'll try to merge talking with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Arnheim Visual Thinking], with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction Abstraction], with [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXl4U1gFTto Ways Of Seeing], with props, with people \__(•_•)__/.<br><br><br> | |||
'''Note 1:''' Abstraction leads to black box systems, so I will have to figure out a way to use it as an entry point (to then unwrap the usually-hidden process) rather then the end one. | |||
'''Note 2:''' This is an attempt to create the possibility of choice, which comes from awareness. Currently, most people are in a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_effect/ default state], this passive condition actively influence our shared overall balance. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koyaanisqatsi/ Our current life is out of balance], in hopes for better times, these thoughts are meant to develop into practices of self and collective care. | |||
::::''this entry was written past 21 so it might be confused''. | |||
Latest revision as of 00:22, 20 October 2024
¿
Dead Poets Society(1989)
Coding is Political
Tempmail
Rosetta Code
e̷v̷e̶r̷y̵t̶h̶i̴n̴g̶ ̵i̷s̵ ̴t̶e̷x̴t̴
c̸o̵m̵p̷u̴t̵e̵r̵ ̷p̴h̴y̷l̵o̵s̵o̶p̵h̸i̴e̶s̷ ̵
s̷p̸a̷t̸i̴a̵l̶ ̶a̶s̷p̴e̵c̷t̸s̵ ̶o̷f̴ ̴t̶e̶c̴h̵n̶o̷l̷o̸g̶y̸
p̴r̶a̵c̵t̶i̵c̴e̷s̶ ̴o̶f̸ ̷c̸a̷r̸e̶
p̸r̸o̴t̴o̵t̵y̸p̴i̸n̶g̴ ̶n̷e̶w̴ ̴e̴d̸u̷c̶a̷t̷i̷o̷n̷?̴
I would be interested in making crash tests in the form of talks/workshops/whatever aimed at trying to bridge the gap between people and computers (technology in general maybe). Computer literacy might be the term that refers to this, by the way, I know that people think that they don't need this at all, that pushing a button is all they need to get trough contemporary life, but I argue that since more and more aspects of life itself get platformed (meaning, they get "digitalized") learning general knowledge of how technology operates can help prevent black box magic and create the base for agency development of the individual (which hopefully then spreads it).
How to do all of this? Well, I think that I'll try to merge talking with Visual Thinking, with Abstraction, with Ways Of Seeing, with props, with people \__(•_•)__/.
Note 1: Abstraction leads to black box systems, so I will have to figure out a way to use it as an entry point (to then unwrap the usually-hidden process) rather then the end one.
Note 2: This is an attempt to create the possibility of choice, which comes from awareness. Currently, most people are in a default state, this passive condition actively influence our shared overall balance. Our current life is out of balance, in hopes for better times, these thoughts are meant to develop into practices of self and collective care.
- this entry was written past 21 so it might be confused.