|
|
| (28 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | | [[cldtlGRS2023|<span style="color:black; background-color:white; font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 15px;"><u>GRS2023 |
| | </u>]] |
| [[Claudio's Thesis - INTRO/OUTRO SteveSuggests]] | | [[Claudio's Thesis - INTRO/OUTRO SteveSuggests]] |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
| general tip
| |
|
| |
| make text more fragmented - keep the annotation form - the non linearity / cumulative associative
| |
|
| |
| === First draft of ''INTRO'' (first chapter of the thesis) ===
| |
|
| |
| <s><br />
| |
| <small>1. A brief presentation of the project - title, topics, tools (from PP)</small></s>
| |
|
| |
| <small><s>2. A reading of an epiphanic moment in my practice last year that I recognize as a significant starting point of this project (new text)</s></small>
| |
|
| |
| <small><s>3. What i'm interested in exploring now. A manifesto (for myself) of interests and intentions. Written as a loose, expansive list of things I'm interested in dealing with. (already in PP + expand with new text)</s></small>
| |
|
| |
| <small><s>4. How I want to work. A set of tools and attitudes (from PP mainly but expand with new text).</s></small>
| |
|
| |
| <small><s>5. Where I'm at now / What I'm doing right now (from PP mainly but expand with new text)</s></small>
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ---- | | ---- |
| ----
| |
| ----''(INTRO TO INTRO)''
| |
|
| |
|
| This text is called ''INTRO''. | | ==== '''<big>''INTRO'' (first chapter)</big>''' ==== |
| | This text is titled ''INTRO''. |
|
| |
|
| ''INTRO'' is a general outline of the starting point of what will be my graduation project, ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES''. It will present its premises, its pinciples, its protocols. The tools I will use, the attitudes I will rely on. The self-imposed limitations I will set myself as guidelines and prompts to work with. The thematic fields that the project will cross and address, the questions driving it, the devices I will use. | | ''INTRO'' is a general outline of the starting point of my graduation research project, ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES''. It will present its premises, its pinciples, the thematic fields that the project will cross and address, the questions driving it, the tools I plan to use, the attitudes I will rely on. |
|
| |
|
| ''INTRO'' is self analyisis of where I am at right now. Now that I have written my Project Proposal yet I have to devise an effective and convincing way to present it and frame it at the assessment in January. Now that I am starting to grasp the essence of the work I am making, that my intentions seem to become more clear and tangible, that I feel I am reaching a state of clarity and coherence between intentions and tools, yet I still have many things to figure out. | | ''INTRO'' is a self-analyisis of where I am at right now. Now that I have written my Project Proposal and I am starting to grasp what I am making yet I feel much will change and evolve and I still have many doubts to figure out. Also, it will serve me as an exercise to reach a temporary state of clarity over the next month and devise an effective and convincing way to present and frame my intentions at the assessment in January. |
|
| |
|
| I will then write another text - ''OUTRO'' - just before the final due date for thesis. It will be a complementary, mirror text to ''INTRO'', an attempt at recapping the work made and reflecting on its achievements and failures, discoveries and future trajectories. | | I will write another text - ''OUTRO'' - just before the final due date for thesis. It will be a complementary, mirror text to ''INTRO'', an attempt at recapping the work made and reflecting on its achievements and failures, its discoveries and future trajectories. Also, a more detailed description of the form that this project will take in the graduation show. |
|
| |
|
| ---- | | ---- |
|
| |
|
| | ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' is a visual research project that I will carry on over the coming months, towards the graduation. During the first year I focused on a rather broad yet quite specific field of research, which I would frame as the theory and practice of image-making, and, conversely, of the experience of images, considered in their complex implications - technological/technical, material, semiotic, affective/existential - between their digital and analog nature. In other words, I have been concerned with the conditions of possibility of images by constantly lingering on their limits. This project belongs to the same research path. |
|
| |
|
| ''INTRO'' | | ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' will be an elemental exploration of fundamental questions about seeing and being: the way we see, what we see, why we see, and where we stand. It will give form to a critical discourse and practice that weaves together and questions the experience of the world by seeing it, through light, on images and screens, the materiality of these - as physical/analog and virtual/digital objects, and the related quest to find meaning and stand in between these, living the tension between nihilism and the sublime. A personal reflection on the experience of seeing as well as a (self)reflection on the possibilities of the medium of (moving) images. |
|
| |
|
| | ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' will take the form of a cumulative, open-ended, expansive work on visual material from different sources and with different qualities. Its subjects will be (???, still defining this) |
|
| |
|
| ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' is a visual research project that I will carry on over the coming months, towards the final graduation. During the first year I focused on a rather broad yet quite specific field of research, which I would frame as the theory and practice of image-making, and, conversely, of the experience of images, considered in their complex implications - technological/technical, material, semiotic, affective/existential - with particular regard to the digital realm - but not exclusively. In other words, my work has been concerned with the conditions of possibility of images by constantly lingering on their limits. This project belongs to the same research path. It's an attempt at reaching its core and making it more radical both in content and form.
| | piercing light leaks and dark black holes, over- and under- exposed shots, webcam shots of empty beaches, blinding flashes and fast flickers, windows, curtains, screens, empty/lost eyes, pixels, digital noise, black and white blank frames [tbc...], |
|
| |
|
| ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' will be an elemental exploration of fundamental questions about seeing and being: the way we see, what we see, why we see, and where we stand. It will give form to a critical discourse and practice that weaves together and questions the experience of the world by seeing it through light on images and screens, the materiality of these - as physical/analog and virtual/digital objects, and the related struggle to find meaning and stand in between these, living the tension between nihilism and the sublime. A personal reflection on the experience of seeing as well as a (self)reflection on the possibilities of the medium of (moving) images. Also, a way to confront myself with the influences that make up my artistic background.
| | collected and choreographed together in short, stand-alone sketches/fragments. An annotation process will run parallel, unfolding meaning in written form, producing text material that will end up in this thesis work and in the final piece for the graduation show. |
|
| |
|
| ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' will then take the form of a cumulative, open-ended, expansive constellation/compilation of rather abstract visual material from different sources and with different qualities. Its subjects will be piercing light leaks and dark black holes, over- and under- exposed shots, blinding flashes and fast flickers, windows, curtains, screens, eyes, pixels, digital noise, black and white blank frames [tbc...], collected and choreographed together as an open series of short, stand-alone sketches/fragments. An annotation process will run parallel, unfolding meaning in written form, and producing text material that will end up in the thesis work and - maybe - in the final piece for the graduation show. | | ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' will find its outcome at the graduation show as an experimental moving image work, in an installation form. I envision it either as a single-screen compilation or a multi-channel installation comprising of (4?) speculative episodes/parts, mutually interconnected yet self sufficient. |
|
| |
|
| ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' will find its outcome at the graduation show as an experimental moving image work, between 8 and 15 minutes in length, in an expanded installation form. It will probably have a fragmented, open - yet structured - form as a result of the non-linear process of its making.
| | They will be exercises of/attempts at seeing. For me while making, for the viewer watching (DEVELOP THIS hint more) |
|
| |
|
| ---- | | ---- |
| | |
|
| |
|
| I can pinpoint a specific moment in my practice last year that I now recognize as an early, intuitive yet strikingly clear turning point. A turning point that brought up and matched, suddenly, unexpectedly, images and ideas, topics and tools, theory an praxis. An epiphanic encounter that caught my attention, marked my practice and whose resonance I can find in the project I am about to engage with. | | <s>(will also evolve into a separate part OF THE THESIS? As I often struggle to clearly understand and therefore explain what I'm interested in, what and why I make, I will commit to an exercise of repeatedly writing short paragraphs trying to pinpoint the core concerns of what I make. A series of attempts at defining what I'm making - Write 1 sentence/short paragraph each day (?) in which I try to put down, in simple sentences, what I am interested in, as an artist, define the field in which i am moving.</s> |
| | ''<s>(WHAT) I'M INTERESTED IN (WHAT)</s>'' |
|
| |
|
| For the "Writing through editing" workshop - in the second semester of the first year of the course, we were asked to make a short 5 minute video using footage from the Open Beelden online archive. The piece I made was titled ''A cameraman filming aka FILMINGWATCHINGBURNING ('' <nowiki>https://youtu.be/l_7_ol6iXIo</nowiki>) and was built around a rather intriguing clip I accidentally found in the archive showing two cameramen filming each other on top of a skyscraper being built in New York in the 1920s. That short clip held a unique self-reflexive nature which immediately attracted me: its subject was not New York's fast vertical growth - which remained, literally - in the background, yet the very act of filmmaking, of making images of the world, by means of cameras and film. The subjects were the two filmmakers, filming each other while filming the world in front of them. I built my piece around that clip, editing it together with other footage - this time intentionally looked for, not found - that could bring out and develop that self-reflective nature even further. A film projector, a film strip burning, as well as various images of eyes. I wanted to weave together the act of seeing/watching, the act of making images through film, and a more intuitive notion of burning - light burns the chemicals to impress the celluloid, eyes burn when they stay open for too long or, a burning desire and need to see things. Along the whole piece, with varying intensity, I used a flickering effect, as a device to make the moving image apparatus visible and sensible the viewer; as a metaphor to recall the blinking of the eye, as well as the projector's presence; also, to trigger the physical perception of moving images and further play with the provoking idea of burning eyes.
| | <s><br /> |
| | | Through making ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES,''</s> |
| In the first half of the piece, I crafted a quite intense sequence featuring a fast edit of footage of the two cameramen, images of eyes and text-on-screen playing with variations of the phrases EYES WATCHING / WATCHING EYES, all layered with a flickering effect. All of a sudden, the screens goes black, abruptly. After a few seconds, a new text-on-screen appears, white letters on black: EYES BURNING.
| |
| | |
| A hard flickering sequence - white and black frames only - follows, emphasizing even more the sensation of burning eyes. The same text stays on screen, floating through the flickering frames. Then, a countershot image of an unfocused projector beaming light towards the camera appears - as if it was the source of that flickering sequence, and brings back the piece to figurative imagery. The piece goes on.
| |
| | |
| Something very powerful seemed to happen here, which I only realised when watching the final edit of the work. The moment the screen goes black, the viewer's eyes - until then hit and overstimulated by the mass of fast edited images - are caught unprepared. On that unexpected pitch black screen, afterimages appear, the flickering effect seems to continue, the physical effect of the images seen before, their backlash on the viewer's retinas, is felt. Then, on that same black, the text appears. EYES BURNING. A subtle yet precise description not only of some of the images seen before - eyes looking at the camera, shedding tears - but also of the actual physical sensation built and triggered by those very images and the way they had been edited, and felt by the viewer in that specific moment of the piece. Then, a coincidence, a coming together of images seen, physical perception and conceptual meaning.
| |
| | |
| This effect was not intentional. Of course, it was the result, of a rational process of editing, yet I only realized its potential the moment I exported the final edit. It was an epiphanic moment, whose encounter was unexpected and striking. I don't think I got it immediately, I needed time to digest it, to think about it, yet - now - I feel it is an effective reference point in showing me a direction I want to pursue in my future practice, and that it contains, in a nutshell, many elements whose use and potential I want to explore in making this new project.
| |
| | |
| Abstract, minimal imagery, working with light as a raw material, self reflection on the medium, embodied/physical/haptic (?) experience of images. Engaging and challenging the viewer's experience of moving images, its position in regards to them, both on a conceptual level and on a physical one. [...]
| |
| | |
| These are all elements I want to deal with in making this new project.
| |
| | |
| <small><br />
| |
| '''<s>[Steve suggests: in the piece described above, you are also making the viewer conscious of the experience of viewing the piece, which is encoded with 'burning eyes/eyes burning'. Please consider what this mirroring of words does, EYES WATCHING / WATCHING EYES seems redundant, but for me it suggests a shift from the inside of the film to the outside, between the object (the film) and the viewer, between the semiotics and the affect. the dash / is like a hinge that meaning swings on. By this logic FILMINGWATCHINGBURNING could be FILMINGWATCHINGBURNING/BURNINGWATCHINGFILMING. The material and the experience of the material feedback. This is consistent with your desire to work on the border between blindness and sight; visibility and invisibility.]</s>'''</small>
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| | |
| ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' is an attempt at exploring and questioning what I acknowledge as the core interests of my research as an artist. | |
| | |
| It will <s>navigate between</s> be equally concerned with theoretical topics and formal reflections. Matching form and content - form-to-content, content-to-form - is a key goal for me. Their mutual conceptual necessity is fundamental for me.
| |
| | |
| I will explore a quite specific yet multifaceted rage of interests/topics, through a self-imposedly limited set of tools and attitudes, attempting at ... better defining and deepening my field of research - and existence - as an artist, ... establish a working process in my practice and sharpen my visual language.
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| | |
| ''(WHAT) I'M INTERESTED IN (WHAT)''
| |
| | |
| I’m interested in exploring the fundamental elements and conditions of vision, their limits and the possibilities of blindness.
| |
| | |
| I’m interested in light and its double potential to make things visible and to make blind. Its absence and presence, its double effects on images and vision. To drown in light, or to emerge from it. To appear and conceal. To make the world exist, or vanish.
| |
|
| |
|
| I want to move along the fine lines between visibility and invisibility, between transparency and opacity.
| | <s>I’m interested in exploring the fundamental elements and conditions of vision, its limits and the notion of blindness in relation to images and image-making.</s> |
|
| |
|
| I'm interested in those liminal moments when nothing (or everything) is seen as something, or when something that can't be seen becomes nothing. Things becoming nothing, something, everything in and through light, in and trough images.
| | <s>I’m interested in light and its double potential to make things visible and to make blind. Its absence and presence, its double effects on images and vision. To drown in light, or to emerge from it. To appear and conceal. To make the world exist, or vanish.</s> |
|
| |
|
| I'm interested in the paradoxical link between nihilism and the sublime. | | <s>I'm interested in the fine line between visibility and invisibility, between transparency and opacity.</s> |
|
| |
|
| I want to explore the tension between pure abstraction and mere materiality of images, between representation of the world and presentation of the medium, between seeing everything and not seeing anything. | | <s>I'm interested in those liminal moments when nothing (or everything) is seen as something, or when something that can't be seen becomes nothing. Things becoming nothing, something, everything in and through light, in and trough images.</s> |
|
| |
|
| I’m interested in the images and screens as supports for such paradoxical coexistence of showing and hiding.
| | <s>I'm interested in exploring the liminal states between seeing something, everything, nothing.</s> |
|
| |
|
| The experience of seeing - something, everything, nothing - will be the main subject for the project. Light will be its raw material.
| | <s>I'm interested in the paradoxical link between nihilism and the sublime.</s> |
|
| |
|
| Light as a ''flash''. The flash of light as a concept, an image, and a physical phenomenon. The flash as the basic unit of light; as a (im)pulse for/on vision. As a singular, sudden event of extreme light that paradoxically reveals and blinds. As a device for apparition and concealment, of existence and negation. As a metaphor and image for both nihilism and the sublime. Also, the flash as the fundament of every experience of moving images, and of digital screens too.
| | <s>I'm interested in explore the tension between pure abstraction and mere materiality of images, between representation of the world and presentation of the medium, between seeing everything and not seeing anything.</s> |
|
| |
|
| The concept of ''blind spot''. Ocular blind spots in retinal structures; blind(ing) elements in the "structure" of images (over/under exposures, out-of-focus, flickering ...); images and screens as blind objects; also, blind spots in perception of the world.
| | <s>I’m interested in images and screens as supports for such paradoxical coexistence of showing and hiding.</s> |
|
| |
|
| ''Failure'' of images is another key notion. I'm interested in the paradox of making fail-ed/-ing images as part of my image-making practice as a visual artist. I'm interested in exploring and working on events of failure of images. Failed images as images that question and subvert their expected representative value. Images that represents nothing-ness, that show themselves as images, that are blind and what blind the viewer, both physically and conceptually. | | <s>I'm interested in the concept of ''blind spot''. Ocular blind spots in retinal structures; blind(ing) elements in the "structure" of images (over/under exposures, out-of-focus, flickering ...); images and screens as blind objects; also, blind spots in perception of the world.</s> |
|
| |
|
| | <s>I'm interested in exploring light as a ''flash''. The flash of light as a concept, an image, and a physical phenomenon. The flash as the basic unit of light; as a (im)pulse for/on vision. As a singular, sudden event of extreme light that paradoxically reveals and blinds. As a device for apparition and concealment, of existence and negation. As a metaphor and image for both nihilism and the sublime. Also, the flash as the fundament of every experience of moving images, and of digital screens too.</s> |
|
| |
|
| Hereafter, I compile an expansive list of keywords that are somehow called into question by ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES''. I will consider translating it into a conceptual diagram/map to give a visual sense of their mutual implications, their relevance and position in the project.
| | <s>I'm interested in the f''ailure'' of images. The paradox of making fail-ed/-ing images as part of my image-making practice as a visual artist. I'm interested in exploring and working on events of failure of images. Failed images as images that question and subvert their expected representative value. Images that represents nothing-ness, that show themselves as images, that are blind and that blind the viewer, both physically and conceptually.</s> |
|
| |
|
| This list is a prelude to the part 3 of this thesis (A CATALOG/COMPENDIUM OF CONCEPTS (Working title), which will further and deeper develop some of these notions in closer relation to the actual making of the project over the coming months.
| | <s>I'm interested in the repetition and variation, in the redundancy, of images.</s> |
|
| |
|
| (edit it)
| | <s>I'm interested in the durational experience/effect of watching.</s> |
|
| |
|
| | Hereafter, I compile an expansive list of keywords that will somehow be called into question by ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES''. I will consider translating it into a conceptual diagram/map to give a visual sense of their mutual implications, their relevance and position in the project. Elements from this list will be more specifically elaborated on in this thesis (''A CATALOG/COMPENDIUM OF CONCEPTS)'' in closer relation to the actual development of the project over the coming months. |
|
| |
|
| seeing/not seeing | | seeing/not seeing |
| Line 126: |
Line 80: |
|
| |
|
| representation | | representation |
|
| |
| black/white
| |
|
| |
| 0/1
| |
|
| |
| on/off
| |
|
| |
| being/not being
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| phisicality of images and image-making devices
| |
|
| |
| lenses, sensors, screens
| |
|
| |
| human eye structures
| |
|
| |
| software/hardware
| |
|
| |
| digital/analog
| |
|
| |
| virtual/physical
| |
|
| |
| technology/the technical
| |
|
| |
| experiencing images
| |
|
| |
| affective (?) effects of (digital) images
| |
|
| |
| existentialism
| |
|
| |
| nihilism/sublime
| |
|
| |
|
| materiality/abstraction | | materiality/abstraction |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| edges/borders/thresholds/margins/limits/interfaces | | edges/borders/thresholds/margins/limits/interfaces |
|
| |
|
| visual cultures, media theory
| | errors-glitches-artifacts-failures |
|
| |
|
| errors-glitches-artifacts-failures
| | flashes, flickers |
|
| |
|
| flashes
| | immateriality-materiality in/of (digital) images |
|
| |
|
| flickers
| | blind spots |
|
| |
|
| immateriality - materiality in/of (digital) images
| | gaze/image/screen |
|
| |
|
| blind spots
| | phisicality of images and image-making devices |
|
| |
|
| gaze / image / screen
| | depth/surface |
|
| |
|
| .
| | lenses, sensors, screens, human eye structures |
|
| |
|
| | software/hardware, digital/analog, virtual/physical |
|
| |
|
| .
| | technology/the technical |
|
| |
|
| .
| | existentialism, nihilism/sublime |
|
| |
|
| ---- | | ---- |
| Line 190: |
Line 112: |
| ''A SET OF TOOLS AND ATTITUDES AKA HOW I WANT TO WORK'' | | ''A SET OF TOOLS AND ATTITUDES AKA HOW I WANT TO WORK'' |
|
| |
|
| In working on BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES, I will deal with and question several things, theoretical topics formal concerns .... | | In working on ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' I will rely on some tools and attitudes that I want to set myself both as sidelines and prompts to guide my practice. |
|
| |
|
| I will navigate between form and content | | I want to embrace and develop an approach to images that is both, at the same time, sculptural and open-ended. A DIY, constant sketching, “non-finito” approach. Make rapid, rough, short sketches, yet consistently, as a way to explore possible forms and meanings. To keep eyes and doors open, to open eyes and doors. |
|
| |
|
| between
| | I want to work with images in a more dirty, reckless, less polished way. This does not mean I want to work carelessly. But carefree. And rather give more space to a process and a practice rather than to projects. . A practice against - or devoid of - the fear and the fetish of the final result. It is the way of working that I feel more at ease with and I believe it can be the most effective one in exploring and reaching the core topics and interests of my work. This does not mean I am not interested in reaching points in which I can show completed works to an audience. This ongoing practice will produce a body of fragments whose meaning is made by their whole, and whose whole will be the foundation for the making of my final graduation piece. |
|
| |
|
| fragmented sketching - work against the fetish of the final piece
| | I want to work and convey meaning mainly with and through images. I want to use text and sound as secondary devices to facilitate this. |
|
| |
|
| redundancy/repetition/variation
| | While I will still be using found footage, I want to work again also behind the lens, making and working with my own images too. I plan to use different cameras. I will rely on my handy Canon camcorder as a visual note-taking device, to capture images on the go. I am getting familiar with more advanced cameras from WDKA's rental facility to be able to make more high-quality footage. I also plan to try my hand at working partially with 16mm. To do so, I will take the introductory workshop and I will become member of Filmwerkplaats in February 2024. |
| | I want to work exclusively in black and white, as a way to reduce the information to the essential elements of images that I am interested in - light and shadows, textures. I might withdraw this choice later on, but color feels superfluous right now. |
|
| |
|
| sculptural attitude
| | I want to simplify my editing workflow. Keep my timeline slim, avoid excessive use of editing trickeries and rely more on the simple power of juxtaposing images alone. |
|
| |
|
| exercises in seeing. for me while making, for the viewer watching)
| | [... add/expand/remove something?] |
|
| |
|
| | | ---- |
| TOOLS / SELF IMPOSED LIMITATIONS
| |
| | |
| black and white
| |
| | |
| simple images
| |
| | |
| two channels of edting (4 tracks in total in davinci + 1 adj layer) - keep the editing tricks simple
| |
| | |
| film 16mm?
| |
| | |
| sound?
| |
| | |
| there s something with
| |
| | |
| deepness and flatness
| |
| | |
| surface of the screen and its movement, its rupture
| |
| | |
| holes in surfaces
| |
| | |
| modules/units and structures/patterns/repetitions
| |
| | |
| redundancy to articulate tensions
| |
| | |
| idea for final output
| |
| | |
| a 16 mm film - screened as a analog projection loop - made as a compilation of short sketches - in between: short still fragmented texts that loosely relate to the images and partially elaborate on the topics involved
| |
| | |
| 1 projector x sketch? why not
| |
| | |
| use 16mm print stock film - very high contrast, I feel it very much suits the premises of my project - and cheaper
| |
| | |
| use of a simple, reduced, minimal language
| |
| | |
| short video fragments, still images (often screenshots from somewhere else)
| |
| | |
| editing / post production techniques as ways of layering new meaning on appropriated imagery
| |
| | |
| lo-fi, DIY attitude
| |
| | |
| black and white / monochrome / grayscales
| |
| | |
| structural elements and devices of (mostly digital) images and image-making (pixel grids, screens)
| |
| | |
| (video) loop form.
| |
| | |
| minimalism
| |
| | |
| reduction
| |
| | |
| abstraction
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| .
| |
| description - tautology - self-reflection
| |
| | |
| embrace an approach to images that is more sculptural and open-ended - a DIY, constant sketching, “non-finito” approach. Produce rapid, rough, short sketches, yet consistently, as a body of short fragments whose meaning is made by their whole. It is the way of working that I feel more at ease with and I believe it can be the most effective one in exploring and reaching the core topics and interests of my artistic work. I want to work with images in a more dirty, reckless, less polished way. Also, while I’m still interested in using found footage, I would like to work more substantially behind the lens, making and working with my own images too.
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| | ''WHERE I'M AT RIGHT NOW AKA WHAT I'M MAKING WHILE WRITING THIS TEXT'' |
|
| |
|
| Through a work of annotation, reflection and speculation, I will progressively track its unfolding and draw connections to those theoretical and artistic references that lay in the background of my work. In line with the open and explorative nature of the project, references and links will come up along the way. However, as a starting point, I will refer to two main fields of theory. On one side, media theory, visual studies, semiotics, aesthetics, theories of images, screens, of vision/visual perception/gaze. On the other side, I will reflect on influences from minimal and conceptual art tradition, structural filmmaking from the 60s/70s, as well as more contemporary moving image artists.
| | Working to present some more concrete plans for the assessment. |
| ----''WHERE I'M AT RIGHT NOW AKA WHAT I'M MAKING WHILE WRITING THIS TEXT''
| |
|
| |
|
| FEW LINES, NOT MUCH,it's already too long text
| | MANY DOUBTS, THE BIGGEST ONE: |
|
| |
|
| working digitally right now, plan to transition to 16mm from january, trying to figure out the workflow for that
| | IS THIS TOO FORMALISTIC, TOO SELF REFERENTIAL, NOT INTEREESTING, NOT SAYING ANYTHING ON THE EXTERNAL WORLD OUT THERE? IS IT JUST FORM WITHOUT CONTENT? IS THIS TOO SIMPLE? - THIS IS WHAT DAVID IS WARNING ME ABOUT - i am not really engaging with the topics i seem to be interested in. |
|
| |
|
| working to produce something concrete for the assessment already
| | HOW CAN I MAKE IT MORE MORE RELATABLE FOR AN AUDIENCE, HOW CAN I FIND ENTRY POINTS in my work FOR THE WORLD AND FOR OTHERS? |
| | |
| considering the place that text and sound will have, necessity of a narrative of some sort / how and to what extent give information to audience.
| |
|
| |
|
| | 1) opening up my practice, considering using more images "of the world" - less abstract |
|
| |
|
| | 2) considering the place that text and sound will have, the necessity to find a narrative of some sort, how and to what extent give information to audience. |
|
| |
|
| ---- | | ---- |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| (END OF INTRO) | | (END OF INTRO) |
| ---- | | ---- |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| intentions / interests - a first intro to concepts and interests and fields of exploration - a list? a manifesto for myself?
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| where i am at right now, what images I akready have, i am already working on?
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| what tools will i use, what practice
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES''
| |
|
| |
| explore and give form to fundamental questions about seeing and being: the way we see, what we see, why we see, and where we stand.
| |
|
| |
| I’m interested in exploring the conditions of vision, their limits and the possibilities of blindness.
| |
|
| |
| I’m interested in light and its double potential to make things visible and to make blind. Its absence and presence, its double effects on images and vision. To drown in light, or to emerge from it. To appear and conceal. To make the world exist, or vanish. I want to move along the fine lines between visibility and invisibility, between transparency and opacity.
| |
|
| |
| I'm interested in those liminal moments when nothing (or everything) is seen as something, or when something that can't be seen becomes nothing. Things becoming nothing, something, everything in and through light, in and trough images.
| |
|
| |
| I'm interested in the paradoxical link between nihilism and the sublime.
| |
|
| |
| I want to explore the tension between pure abstraction and mere materiality of images, between representation of the world and presentation of the medium, between seeing everything and not seeing anything.
| |
|
| |
| I’m interested in the images and screens as supports for such paradoxical coexistence of showing and hiding.
| |
|
| |
| The experience of seeing - something, everything, nothing - will be the main subject for the project. Light will be its raw material.
| |
|
| |
| As of now, I'm particularly interested in approaching and working with light as a ''flash''. The flash of light as a concept, an image, and a physical phenomenon. The flash as the basic unit of light; as a (im)pulse for/on vision. As a singular, sudden event of extreme light that paradoxically reveals and blinds. As a device for apparition and concealment, of existence and negation. As a metaphor and image for both nihilism and the sublime. Also, the flash as the fundament of every experience of moving images, and of digital screens too.
| |
|
| |
| Another key concept for this research is the notion of ''blind spot''. Ocular blind spots in retinal structures; blind(ing) elements in the "structure" of images (over/under exposures, out-of-focus, flickering ...); images and screens as blind objects; also, blind spots in perception of the world.
| |
|
| |
| A third starting point is the idea of ''failure'' of images. I'm interested in the paradox of making fail-ed/-ing images as part of my image-making practice as a visual artist. I'm interested in exploring and working on events of failure of images. Failed images as images that question and subvert their expected representative value. Images that represents nothing-ness, that show themselves as images, that are blind and what blind the viewer, both physically and conceptually.
| |
|
| |
| Ultimately, with this project I want to establish a critical discourse and practice that weaves together and questions the experience of the world by seeing it through light on images and screens, the materiality of these - as physical/analog and virtual/digital objects, and the related struggle to find meaning and stand in between these, living the tension between nihilism and the sublime. A personal reflection on the experience of seeing as well as a (self)reflection on the possibilities of the medium of (moving) images. Also, a way to confront myself with the influences that make up my artistic background.
| |
|
| |
| I will work with a sculptural approach to images as raw materials to mould and manipulate, as well as with a conceptual/minimalist attitude and language. I want to challenge the viewer’s way of seeing - and being - conceptually, physically and affectively.
| |
|
| |
| ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' will then take the form of a cumulative, open-ended, expansive constellation/compilation of rather abstract visual material from different sources and with different qualities, such as appropriated imagery - both still and moving, original footage, DIY animation techniques. An annotation process will run parallel, unfolding meaning in written form, and producing text material that will end up in the thesis work and - maybe - in the final piece for the graduation show.
| |
|
| |
| Its subjects will be piercing light leaks and dark black holes, over- and under- exposed shots, blinding flashes and fast flickers, windows, curtains, screens, eyes, pixels, digital noise, black and white blank frames [tbc...], collected and choreographed together as an open series of short, stand-alone sketches/fragments.
| |
|
| |
| ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' will find its outcome at the graduation show as an experimental moving image work, between 8 and 15 minutes in length, in an expanded installation form. It will probably have a fragmented, open - yet structured - form as a result of the non-linear process of its making.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES'' will be carried out as an on-going, recursive practice. It will unfold as a fragmented yet structured production of a short sketches that give form and explore the core topics of this research. I will work with a mix of imagery from different sources and qualities. My own figure could also be involved - as a way to physically situate myself in and embody that experience of images that the project is specifically concerned with. As I am interested in working with light as a raw material, I am also considering the possibility of experimenting with some of the techniques that I learnt during the analogue film workshop that was held last year.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Over the coming months, I will consistently commit to this practice of sketching as a way to give forms to thoughts and intuitions revolving around the topics that the project deals with. Ideally, each fragment will open the path to others, and so forth. A necessary process of selection and editing will take place along the way - something will be put aside, something kept untouched, most will be repeatedly reworked.
| |
|
| |
| Specific formal choices will be made, in close relation with the field of research I am exploring. For example, I intend to use a rather gritty black-and-white and recurring flicker effects. Contemplative, slow paces and hectic, fast ones will coexist. Another device that I intend to employ is the repetition of and variation on the same images, its hypnotic, generative, epiphanic potential.
| |
|
| |
| Text could be featured too, giving the work an essayistic and speculative undertone which however will not be a dominant mode of address. I want to rely more on the power of images alone to convey meaning.
| |
|
| |
| Sound will not have a dominant role. At this stage of the process I am working with no sound at all, but I will consider if and how to use it to enhance - and not outweigh - the experience of images alone.
| |
|
| |
| In terms of the final display of this project, I envision it as an expanded installation made of multiple elements. This will be better defined in a later stage of the process. As I understand the critical importance of display to make such a project accessible to an audience, I will thoroughly think of and test various presentation possibilities along the way. Display devices, proportions, scales, dimensions, relations between elements will be specifically devised as an integral part of the project. My architectural background might influence this phase of the work.
| |
|
| |
| '''3. Why do you want to make it?'''
| |
|
| |
| I applied to this course to devote my practice to moving images. During the first year I challenged this intention, questioned my position and understood that my attitude is that of a visual artist working with images as materials rather than a filmmaker who tells stories.This project reflects this stance, and aims at further defining my field of practice and sharpening my visual language. I feel this is necessary to prepare me for the world outside of this course.
| |
|
| |
| During the first year I focused on a rather broad yet quite specific field of research, which I would frame as the theory and practice of image-making, and, conversely, of the experience of images, considered in their complex implications - technological/technical, material, semiotic, affective/existential - with particular regard to the digital realm - but not exclusively. In other words, my work has been concerned with the conditions of possibility of images by constantly lingering on their limits. This project belongs to the same research path. It's an attempt at reaching its core and making it more radical both in content and form.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| '''5. Relation to previous practice'''
| |
|
| |
| I feel this project belongs to the same thematic trajectory that I developed during the first year. I am now trying to bring it further to its extreme consequences.
| |
|
| |
| In the past year, I worked mainly making short essayistic pieces as outputs of a rather structured, research- and text- based workflow, but I realized it is a way of working that I do not feel fully mine. In making this project I want to embrace an approach to images that is more sculptural and open-ended - a DIY, constant sketching, “non-finito” approach. Produce rapid, rough, short sketches, yet consistently, as a body of short fragments whose meaning is made by their whole. It is the way of working that I feel more at ease with and I believe it can be the most effective one in exploring and reaching the core topics and interests of my artistic work. I want to work with images in a more dirty, reckless, less polished way. Also, while I’m still interested in using found footage, I would like to work more substantially behind the lens, making and working with my own images too.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| However, as a starting point, I will refer to two main fields of theory. On one side, media theory, visual studies, semiotics, aesthetics, theories of images, screens, of vision/visual perception/gaze. On the other side, I will reflect on influences from minimal and conceptual art tradition, structural filmmaking from the 60s/70s, as well as more contemporary moving image artists.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| My way of working is relatively loose and non-linear, based on a daily practice of research, sketching, experimentation, selection, led by intention as much as by chances and encounters along the way. I can’t - and don’t want to - follow a scripted workflow. For these reasons, it would be hardly useful - and truthful - to plan a strict timetable for the project.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| from STEVE
| |
|
| |
| Send me an intro (which is already written in your thesis outline) and first chapter draft (which you can experiment and play with) on the 20th, and I will send written feedback on that text ahead of our meeting on the 23rd.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| '''DEADLINE FOR THIS: 4TH OF DECEMBER????'''
| |
GRS2023
Claudio's Thesis - INTRO/OUTRO SteveSuggests
INTRO (first chapter)
This text is titled INTRO.
INTRO is a general outline of the starting point of my graduation research project, BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES. It will present its premises, its pinciples, the thematic fields that the project will cross and address, the questions driving it, the tools I plan to use, the attitudes I will rely on.
INTRO is a self-analyisis of where I am at right now. Now that I have written my Project Proposal and I am starting to grasp what I am making yet I feel much will change and evolve and I still have many doubts to figure out. Also, it will serve me as an exercise to reach a temporary state of clarity over the next month and devise an effective and convincing way to present and frame my intentions at the assessment in January.
I will write another text - OUTRO - just before the final due date for thesis. It will be a complementary, mirror text to INTRO, an attempt at recapping the work made and reflecting on its achievements and failures, its discoveries and future trajectories. Also, a more detailed description of the form that this project will take in the graduation show.
BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES is a visual research project that I will carry on over the coming months, towards the graduation. During the first year I focused on a rather broad yet quite specific field of research, which I would frame as the theory and practice of image-making, and, conversely, of the experience of images, considered in their complex implications - technological/technical, material, semiotic, affective/existential - between their digital and analog nature. In other words, I have been concerned with the conditions of possibility of images by constantly lingering on their limits. This project belongs to the same research path.
BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES will be an elemental exploration of fundamental questions about seeing and being: the way we see, what we see, why we see, and where we stand. It will give form to a critical discourse and practice that weaves together and questions the experience of the world by seeing it, through light, on images and screens, the materiality of these - as physical/analog and virtual/digital objects, and the related quest to find meaning and stand in between these, living the tension between nihilism and the sublime. A personal reflection on the experience of seeing as well as a (self)reflection on the possibilities of the medium of (moving) images.
BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES will take the form of a cumulative, open-ended, expansive work on visual material from different sources and with different qualities. Its subjects will be (???, still defining this)
piercing light leaks and dark black holes, over- and under- exposed shots, webcam shots of empty beaches, blinding flashes and fast flickers, windows, curtains, screens, empty/lost eyes, pixels, digital noise, black and white blank frames [tbc...],
collected and choreographed together in short, stand-alone sketches/fragments. An annotation process will run parallel, unfolding meaning in written form, producing text material that will end up in this thesis work and in the final piece for the graduation show.
BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES will find its outcome at the graduation show as an experimental moving image work, in an installation form. I envision it either as a single-screen compilation or a multi-channel installation comprising of (4?) speculative episodes/parts, mutually interconnected yet self sufficient.
They will be exercises of/attempts at seeing. For me while making, for the viewer watching (DEVELOP THIS hint more)
(will also evolve into a separate part OF THE THESIS? As I often struggle to clearly understand and therefore explain what I'm interested in, what and why I make, I will commit to an exercise of repeatedly writing short paragraphs trying to pinpoint the core concerns of what I make. A series of attempts at defining what I'm making - Write 1 sentence/short paragraph each day (?) in which I try to put down, in simple sentences, what I am interested in, as an artist, define the field in which i am moving.
(WHAT) I'M INTERESTED IN (WHAT)
Through making BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES,
I’m interested in exploring the fundamental elements and conditions of vision, its limits and the notion of blindness in relation to images and image-making.
I’m interested in light and its double potential to make things visible and to make blind. Its absence and presence, its double effects on images and vision. To drown in light, or to emerge from it. To appear and conceal. To make the world exist, or vanish.
I'm interested in the fine line between visibility and invisibility, between transparency and opacity.
I'm interested in those liminal moments when nothing (or everything) is seen as something, or when something that can't be seen becomes nothing. Things becoming nothing, something, everything in and through light, in and trough images.
I'm interested in exploring the liminal states between seeing something, everything, nothing.
I'm interested in the paradoxical link between nihilism and the sublime.
I'm interested in explore the tension between pure abstraction and mere materiality of images, between representation of the world and presentation of the medium, between seeing everything and not seeing anything.
I’m interested in images and screens as supports for such paradoxical coexistence of showing and hiding.
I'm interested in the concept of blind spot. Ocular blind spots in retinal structures; blind(ing) elements in the "structure" of images (over/under exposures, out-of-focus, flickering ...); images and screens as blind objects; also, blind spots in perception of the world.
I'm interested in exploring light as a flash. The flash of light as a concept, an image, and a physical phenomenon. The flash as the basic unit of light; as a (im)pulse for/on vision. As a singular, sudden event of extreme light that paradoxically reveals and blinds. As a device for apparition and concealment, of existence and negation. As a metaphor and image for both nihilism and the sublime. Also, the flash as the fundament of every experience of moving images, and of digital screens too.
I'm interested in the failure of images. The paradox of making fail-ed/-ing images as part of my image-making practice as a visual artist. I'm interested in exploring and working on events of failure of images. Failed images as images that question and subvert their expected representative value. Images that represents nothing-ness, that show themselves as images, that are blind and that blind the viewer, both physically and conceptually.
I'm interested in the repetition and variation, in the redundancy, of images.
I'm interested in the durational experience/effect of watching.
Hereafter, I compile an expansive list of keywords that will somehow be called into question by BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES. I will consider translating it into a conceptual diagram/map to give a visual sense of their mutual implications, their relevance and position in the project. Elements from this list will be more specifically elaborated on in this thesis (A CATALOG/COMPENDIUM OF CONCEPTS) in closer relation to the actual development of the project over the coming months.
seeing/not seeing
showing/hiding
seeing/watching/staring/gazing
vision/blindness
visibility/invisibility
transparency/opacity
representation
materiality/abstraction
edges/borders/thresholds/margins/limits/interfaces
errors-glitches-artifacts-failures
flashes, flickers
immateriality-materiality in/of (digital) images
blind spots
gaze/image/screen
phisicality of images and image-making devices
depth/surface
lenses, sensors, screens, human eye structures
software/hardware, digital/analog, virtual/physical
technology/the technical
existentialism, nihilism/sublime
A SET OF TOOLS AND ATTITUDES AKA HOW I WANT TO WORK
In working on BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES I will rely on some tools and attitudes that I want to set myself both as sidelines and prompts to guide my practice.
I want to embrace and develop an approach to images that is both, at the same time, sculptural and open-ended. A DIY, constant sketching, “non-finito” approach. Make rapid, rough, short sketches, yet consistently, as a way to explore possible forms and meanings. To keep eyes and doors open, to open eyes and doors.
I want to work with images in a more dirty, reckless, less polished way. This does not mean I want to work carelessly. But carefree. And rather give more space to a process and a practice rather than to projects. . A practice against - or devoid of - the fear and the fetish of the final result. It is the way of working that I feel more at ease with and I believe it can be the most effective one in exploring and reaching the core topics and interests of my work. This does not mean I am not interested in reaching points in which I can show completed works to an audience. This ongoing practice will produce a body of fragments whose meaning is made by their whole, and whose whole will be the foundation for the making of my final graduation piece.
I want to work and convey meaning mainly with and through images. I want to use text and sound as secondary devices to facilitate this.
While I will still be using found footage, I want to work again also behind the lens, making and working with my own images too. I plan to use different cameras. I will rely on my handy Canon camcorder as a visual note-taking device, to capture images on the go. I am getting familiar with more advanced cameras from WDKA's rental facility to be able to make more high-quality footage. I also plan to try my hand at working partially with 16mm. To do so, I will take the introductory workshop and I will become member of Filmwerkplaats in February 2024.
I want to work exclusively in black and white, as a way to reduce the information to the essential elements of images that I am interested in - light and shadows, textures. I might withdraw this choice later on, but color feels superfluous right now.
I want to simplify my editing workflow. Keep my timeline slim, avoid excessive use of editing trickeries and rely more on the simple power of juxtaposing images alone.
[... add/expand/remove something?]
WHERE I'M AT RIGHT NOW AKA WHAT I'M MAKING WHILE WRITING THIS TEXT
Working to present some more concrete plans for the assessment.
MANY DOUBTS, THE BIGGEST ONE:
IS THIS TOO FORMALISTIC, TOO SELF REFERENTIAL, NOT INTEREESTING, NOT SAYING ANYTHING ON THE EXTERNAL WORLD OUT THERE? IS IT JUST FORM WITHOUT CONTENT? IS THIS TOO SIMPLE? - THIS IS WHAT DAVID IS WARNING ME ABOUT - i am not really engaging with the topics i seem to be interested in.
HOW CAN I MAKE IT MORE MORE RELATABLE FOR AN AUDIENCE, HOW CAN I FIND ENTRY POINTS in my work FOR THE WORLD AND FOR OTHERS?
1) opening up my practice, considering using more images "of the world" - less abstract
2) considering the place that text and sound will have, the necessity to find a narrative of some sort, how and to what extent give information to audience.
(END OF INTRO)
