Astrid van Nimwegen Trimester1-Draft: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
The things themselves have no consciousness; humans give things consciousness. By perception and interpretation. | The things themselves have no consciousness; humans give things consciousness. By perception and interpretation. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 24 November 2011
(this is a draft of a draft of a draft….?)
How the process becomes the work
‘The shifting of content within the medium’ : film versus video – Astrid van Nimwegen 21/11/2011
Since my medium became film instead of video I created more awareness of the medium itself.
My concept was about existentialism and mostly I used to register a movement through a certain timeline. This involves body/physical on the one hand and mind/psychological on the other hand, an equal synthesis of those two exposes a certain essence/soul/meaning or at least it questions the meaning of our existence and by this the viewers existence is mirrored and he is pushed to remember things he already know but wasn’t aware of anymore.
I only used video as ‘a tool to register’, by using 16mm film and expanding my knowledge of the history of the medium it is clearer to me how film in essence is made. I’m getting more grip on the process and I am more conscious about the medium. Because film has a physical and concrete ‘body’ it seems that the content is shifting now. Time is now literally, physical on the filmstrip itself, instead of present in the action in front of the videocamera.
The meaning of life is not in life itself but in living (experience) life: The meaning of my work is not in the work itself but in the process of making.
The things themselves have no consciousness; humans give things consciousness. By perception and interpretation.