User:Simon/Trim4/fieldwork/feedback from initial bootleg library sessions: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "= Feedback from initial bootleg library sessions: introduction = Some feedback collected during introductory sessions: ==== Languages ==== {| class="wikitable" ! scope="col"...") |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Feedback from initial bootleg library sessions: introduction = | __NOTOC__ | ||
Some feedback collected during introductory sessions: | |||
==Feedback from initial bootleg library sessions: introduction== | |||
Some feedback collected during introductory sessions, December 2019: | |||
==== Languages ==== | ==== Languages ==== |
Latest revision as of 18:39, 18 June 2020
Feedback from initial bootleg library sessions: introduction
Some feedback collected during introductory sessions, December 2019:
Languages
user feedback | decision |
---|---|
1. Descriptions of non-English texts: what is the best protocol? 2. Finding texts in non-English languages - possibly hard to find digital files, easier to find in print? |
1. They should be in the language of the text, with an English translation if possible 2. Digitise printed texts using the bookscanner |
Categorising
user feedback | decision |
---|---|
1. There is a lot of redundancy on the "categories" page. Categories are defined by tags - which are written subjectively, or downloaded from existing data on the uploaded books. There should be a distinction between categorising texts, and tagging them. 2. Tags are case-sensitive, leading to multiple entries of the same tag (e.g. Media Theory vs Media theory vs media theory) |
1. Create a series of general categories, and then tags can exist as sub-categories. Further to this, can tags also be used dynamically? E.g. being able to highlight more popular tags? Tagging people? 2. Force all tags to be in lowercase |
Cataloguing
user feedback | decision |
---|---|
1. We noticed that if an article is uploaded from JSTOR, the book automatically takes the JSTOR logo as the cover. Is this because it is watermarked on the first page of the PDF? |
1. Could watermarking be a way to make covers of future uploaded PDFs? |