User:Simon/The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "== The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction == Printed: 25.09.19<br> Dimensions: 90x120mm<br> Cover stock: Clairefontaine Trophee (ivory) 120gsm<br> Text stock: Clairefontaine Trophe...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction == | ==bootleg book: ''The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction''== | ||
Printed: 25.09.19<br> | Printed: 25.09.19<br> | ||
Dimensions: 90x120mm<br> | Dimensions: 90x120mm<br> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
CB_03.JPG|Back cover with bootleg acknowledgement | CB_03.JPG|Back cover with bootleg acknowledgement | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
[[Category:bootlegs]] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:37, 20 June 2020
bootleg book: The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction
Printed: 25.09.19
Dimensions: 90x120mm
Cover stock: Clairefontaine Trophee (ivory) 120gsm
Text stock: Clairefontaine Trophee (ivory) 120gsm
Binding: Staple bound
Pages: 16pp
Ursula K. Le Guin's short essay appears in a compilation called Dancing at the Edge of the World, which I've found impossible to find online through the usual pirate libraries such as Library Genesis, aaaaaarg.fail and Monoskop. Perhaps this points to a gender bias in what is perceived as knowledge (Le Guin was a woman wrote mostly science-fiction)? In lieu of not being able to find the compilation, I decided to print this book in a very small size (90x120mm) and retain the annotations from the PDF I found. I digitised them by making them into vectors, and printed the text and annotations in green. In this way I wanted to speculate on what would happen when a reader was confronted with annotations that seemed to be part of the source, not a para-text added after publication.
Front cover
Digitised annotations
Back cover with bootleg acknowledgement
