User:Stonestone/EssayT21: Difference between revisions
Stonestone (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(29 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="width:90%; font-family:Courier; padding:0px; float:left;font-size:15; border:1px dash black"> | |||
'''Stone. Grade: 6.5''' | |||
''' | |||
Steve's comments: You are getting to grips with your subject. But I have to mark you down because in places your notation is not too clear (who are you referencing, what text, what page?) and there is no bibliography in the above version. In future you could also make a clearer relation to your self-directed research. | |||
''' | |||
These are the grades: | |||
DISTINCTION | |||
10 (A+) | |||
MERIT | |||
9 (A) | |||
VERY GOOD PASS | |||
8 (A-) | |||
GOOD PASS | |||
7 (B+) | |||
PASS | |||
6 (B) | |||
NEAR PASS | |||
5 (C) | |||
FAIL | |||
4 (D) | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="width:90%; font-family:Courier; padding:0px; float:left;font-size:15;background: #DEB887; border:1px dash black"> | <div style="width:90%; font-family:Courier; padding:0px; float:left;font-size:15;background: #DEB887; border:1px dash black"> | ||
==Essay for Six Selections By The Oulipo: Getting Freedom from Contraints== | ==Broken Essay for Six Selections By The Oulipo: Getting Freedom from Contraints== | ||
===Introduction=== | |||
The text "Six Selections by the Oulipo" is a combination of 6 texts about Oulipo, which are:<br /> | The text "Six Selections by the Oulipo" is a combination of 6 texts about Oulipo, which are:<br /> | ||
50 years ago, a group of French literatures lover established Oulipo (workshop of potential literature). Raymond Queneau (one of the original founders besides Francois Le Lionnais) noted that Oulipo is not a school of literature,a literature | ''One Hudred Thousand Billion Poems'', ''Yours for the Telling'' by Raymond Queneau, ''A Brief History of the Oulipo'' by Jean Lescure, ''For a Potenteial Analysis of Combinatory | ||
Literature'' by Claude Berge, ''Computer and Writer: The Centre Pompidou | |||
Experiment'' by Paul Fournel and ''Prose and Anticombinatorics'' by Italo Calvino. Those articles give us a brief introduction and a glimpse of what is Oulipo and how Oulipo writers work.<br /> | |||
50 years ago, a group of French literatures lover established Oulipo (workshop of potential literature). Raymond Queneau (one of the original founders besides Francois Le Lionnais) noted that Oulipo is not a school of literature,a literature seminer or experiments, but a natural, artificial and amusing workshop where people are able to make up their own writing rules and restricts, in order to spark inspirations and find the vieling possibilities of literature. <br /> | |||
For instance: "Airplane" ( Abbreviation of words.The word "Jet" is the abbreviation abbreviation ), "Beau(belle) Present(e)" ( a poem which compound names of a person you cherished or hated ) or "s+n" ( replace each noun of an existing text by the "N"th noun after it found in a dictionary) etc.. .<br /> | For instance: "Airplane" ( Abbreviation of words.The word "Jet" is the abbreviation abbreviation ), "Beau(belle) Present(e)" ( a poem which compound names of a person you cherished or hated ) or "s+n" ( replace each noun of an existing text by the "N"th noun after it found in a dictionary) etc.. .<br /> | ||
In this essay, I will give my analysis of Oulipo from the perspective of the relationship between contraint and freedom of literature.<br /> | In this essay, I will give my analysis of Oulipo from the perspective of the relationship between contraint and freedom of literature.<br /> | ||
The core of Oulipo rules is based on | ===Contraints=== | ||
The core of Oulipo rules is based on settivng writing rules, which can be considered as "an add operation which is based on subtraction". That is why Oulipo is distinctly different from current schools of literature: hyper-ration, behind-closed-doors chasing for language skills and new forms. "The Oulipo escapes the Romantic cul-de-sac of unfettered imagination (or its Surrealist avatar, chance) by reintroducing external constraints, which are self-imposed."quoted from ''Oulipo: Freeing literature by tightening its rules.'' | |||
In another words, the artificial contraints are a symbol of Oulipo, with which writers can write in gameplay. <br /> | |||
Language is a complicated container or system combining with different functional parts. However, from Oulipo writers' point of view, it can also be an objected self-supported subject. Putting contraints into language makes the linguistic functions under-controlled.<br /> | Language is a complicated container or system combining with different functional parts. However, from Oulipo writers' point of view, it can also be an objected self-supported subject. Putting contraints into language makes the linguistic functions under-controlled.<br /> | ||
For example, Lipogram, which is known as one of Oulipo writing methods, sets up the rule as writing excluding one or more letters. In ''Dissappear'' , Georges Perec did not use the letter "e" which is the most common letter in French. In a report, Marcel Bénabou noted that during the period of writing this novel, Georges Perec listed all the words that he could use without "e", the list was endless. <br /> | For example, Lipogram, which is known as one of Oulipo writing methods, sets up the rule as writing excluding one or more letters. In ''Dissappear'' , Georges Perec did not use the letter "e" which is the most common letter in French. In a report, Marcel Bénabou noted that during the period of writing this novel, Georges Perec listed all the words that he could use without 0"e", the list was endless. <br /> | ||
Another typical work is ''One Hundred Thousand Billion Poems'' by Raymond Queneau. It "is a set of ten sonnets, printed on card with each line on a separated strip, like a heads-bodies-and-legs book, a type of children's book with which Queneau was familiar. As all ten sonnets have not just the same rhyme scheme but the same rhyme sounds, any lines from a sonnet can be combined with any from the nine others, so that there are 100,000,000,000,000 different poems". This work can be treated as a computer programme, which can be randomly or artificially made by audience. However, The work is readable and followed by sonnet rules strictly. <br /> | Another typical work is ''One Hundred Thousand Billion Poems'' by Raymond Queneau. It "is a set of ten sonnets, printed on card with each line on a separated strip, like a heads-bodies-and-legs book, a type of children's book with which Queneau was familiar. As all ten sonnets have not just the same rhyme scheme but the same rhyme sounds, any lines from a sonnet can be combined with any from the nine others, so that there are 100,000,000,000,000 different poems". This work can be treated as a computer programme, which can be randomly or artificially made by audience. However, The work is readable and followed by sonnet rules strictly. <br /> | ||
However, the mainstream would never accept "linguistic games". Marcus Valerius Martialis once said that indulging in tricks is shameful and stupid. As a matter of fact, every school of literature has their own rules, more or less. These rules can also be seen as contraints (tricks), only because they had already been accepted by public, in general.<br /> | |||
For instance, in traditional Chinese literature, there was a school called Jueju(绝句, broken off lines) which was popular in Tang Dynasty (from the period from 618 to 907). " Jueju poems are always quatrains; or, more specifically, a matched pair of couplets, with each line consisting of five or seven syllables" with the same rhymes. It requires author to fully use every character to create a successful poem. <br /> | |||
For instance, in traditional Chinese literature, there was a school called Jueju(绝句, broken off lines) which was popular in Tang Dynasty (from the period from 618 to 907). " Jueju poems are always quatrains; or, more specifically, a matched pair of couplets, with each line consisting of five or seven syllables" with the same rhymes. It requires author to fully use every character to create a successful poem.Thus, setting up rules is not a rare issue in literature field.<br /> | Thus, setting up rules is not a rare issue in literature field. <br /> | ||
In every literature genre, the reason why we setup rules and contraints, is not only because we want to play with words or letters, but also we can find out some potential things which we have missed when writing "regular" text, as a result, from which, the literature's conventions spilt out. <br /> | In every literature genre, the reason why we setup rules and contraints, is not only because we want to play with words or letters, but also we can find out some potential things which we have missed when writing "regular" text, as a result, from which, the literature's conventions spilt out. <br /> | ||
As the "alchemy" of language, Oulipo cooks the words with 100% | ===From Contraints to Freedom=== | ||
"Art lives from constraints and dies from freedom."Leonardo da Vinci. | |||
As the "alchemy" of language, Oulipo cooks the words with 100% sobriety and objectivity. In another words, the inspiration of writing is also been controlled. Their inspiration and creativity from the totally-controlled literature contraints they set by themselves.<br /> | |||
====Mathematics and Oulipo==== | |||
Mathematics, as the footstone of science, plays a very important role in Oulipo rules' setup. "Shape" and "number", as two basic elements in Maths world, makes everything in our daily life can be calculated or counted, instead of based on the vague sense, also known as the original ability of abstract thinking of humanbeing. The more the abstract is, the more a science can apply on other sciences. Thus, it is inevitable that Mathematics can be a useful tool for other subjects. As Karl Marx noted that "A science can be truly developing when it can apply Mathematics successfully." <br /> | |||
"All art should become science, and all science art." If Friedrich Schlegel's point of view is right, let's put literature as a huge kind of science, then, Oulipo can be a branch of the science". Oulipo, apparently, is developing by the extensive appliance of Maths. In contrast to the other schools of literature whose writing methods are mainly based on sense and feeling of authors, Oulipo brings us a mathematicly abstract and logic reading experience. Rules, | |||
As a matter of fact, Oulipo is consisted of not only professional lovers but also scientists and mathematicians. Raymond Queneau, known as one of the founders of Oulipo, also has the background of mathematics. He researched and came forward a new notion "Queneau Sequence". Besides, In his works ''Odile'' and "Les Enfants du limon", he also explained some maths questions and solved maths problems. That is the reason why Oulipo has abundant content and very strong logicality, which is closely related with the attribute of Mathematics. Building up rules with strong sense of logic can be compared to making a "cup", which signify that Oulipian can fill the cup with anything they want. | |||
Contraint is absolute, and freedom is relative. | |||
<br /> | |||
====Infinite Blink==== | |||
Recently, I put my all attention on making light installation "Infinite Blink", which is combined with LED and 3d/2d projection. LED, as the container of a projection. The blink container can be the contraint of projection, or even if, can be seen as the stage of water. It gives the projection a platform to spin or move along, at the same time, the container also limit the moving scale of the projection. Machines, which in my point of view, are one of the most controlled stuff in the world, which must be calculated logically by their creators. However, the functions and the appearances can be created in many ways. It is machines who set up rules, using rules and giving them lives is what the humans do. | |||
===Conclusion=== | ===Conclusion=== | ||
There are two standards to critic Oulipo works: Firstly, settings of rules (technical perspective), the other is the works themselves (literature perspective). A successful Oulipo work should successfully reaches these two critical points. No matter how complicated or difficult the contraints and rules are in Oulipo grammar, after all, Oulipo is still in the circle of literature, which means readers are able to and should enjoy reading it like reading the other "normal" works. | There are two standards to critic Oulipo works: Firstly, settings of rules (technical perspective), the other is the works themselves (literature perspective). A successful Oulipo work should successfully reaches these two critical points. No matter how complicated or difficult the contraints and rules are in Oulipo grammar, after all, Oulipo is still in the circle of literature, which means readers are able to and should enjoy reading it like reading the other "normal" works. | ||
<br /> | |||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
[Steve: how to extend this: a) make relation to own work b) look at conceptualist art works from early 60s on. c) How have these principles been extended into digital forms?] | |||
Oulipo wiki | Oulipo wiki | ||
</div> | |||
</ | <div style="width:90%; font-family:Courier; padding:0px; float:left;font-size:15;background:lightpink; border:1px dash black"> | ||
==Orwell Ver. : Broken Essay for Six Selections By The Oulipo: Getting Freedom from Contraints (in progress)== | |||
===Introduction=== | |||
The text "Six Selections by the Oulipo" is a combination of 6 texts about Oulipo. Those texts are ''One Hudred Thousand Billion Poems'', ''Yours for the Telling'' by Raymond Queneau, ''A Brief History of the Oulipo'' by Jean Lescure, ''For a Potenteial Analysis of Combinatory | |||
Literature'' by Claude Berge, ''Computer and Writer: The Centre Pompidou | |||
Experiment'' by Paul Fournel and ''Prose and Anticombinatorics'' by Italo Calvino. Those articles give us a brief introduction and a glimpse of what is Oulipo and how Oulipo writers work.<br /> | |||
50 years ago, a group of French literature lovers established Oulipo. Oulipo means workshop of potential literature. Raymond Queneau who is one of the original founders noted that Oulipo is not a school of literature,a literature seminer or experiments, but a natural, artificial and amusing workshop where people make up their own writing rules and restricts, in order to spark inspirations and find the literature possibilities. <br /> | |||
For instance: "Airplane" ( Abbreviation of words.The word "Jet" is the abbreviation ), "Beau(belle) Present(e)" ( a poem which compound names of a person you cherished or hated ) or "s+n" ( replace each noun of an existing text by the "n"th noun after it found in a dictionary) etc. .<br /> | |||
In this essay, I will give my analysis of Oulipo from the perspective of the relationship between contraint and freedom of literature.<br /> | |||
===Contraints=== | |||
The core of Oulipo rules is based on setting writing rules. That is why Oulipo is distinctly different from current schools of literature, which chases for language skills and new forms. "The Oulipo escapes the Romantic cul-de-sac of unfettered imagination (or its Surrealist avatar, chance) by reintroducing external constraints, which are self-imposed."quoted from ''Oulipo: Freeing literature by tightening its rules.'' | |||
In another words, the artificial contraints are a symbol of Oulipo, with which writers can write in gameplay. <br /> | |||
Language is a complicated container or system combining with different functional parts. However, from Oulipo writers' point of view, it can also be an objected self-supported subject. Putting contraints into language makes the linguistic functions under-controlled.<br /> | |||
For example, Lipogram, which is known as one of Oulipo writing methods, sets up the rule as writing excluding one or more letters. In ''Dissappear'' , Georges Perec did not use the letter "e" which is the most common letter in French. In a report, Marcel Bénabou noted that during the period of writing this novel, Georges Perec listed all the words that he could use without 0"e", the list was endless. <br /> | |||
Another typical work is ''One Hundred Thousand Billion Poems'' by Raymond Queneau. It "is a set of ten sonnets, printed on card with each line on a separated strip, like a heads-bodies-and-legs book, a type of children's book with which Queneau was familiar. As all ten sonnets have not just the same rhyme scheme but the same rhyme sounds, any lines from a sonnet can be combined with any from the nine others, so that there are 100,000,000,000,000 different poems". This work can be treated as a computer programme, which can be randomly or artificially made by audience. However, The work is readable and followed by sonnet rules strictly. <br /> | |||
However, the mainstream would never accept "linguistic games". Marcus Valerius Martialis once said that indulging in tricks is shameful and stupid. As a matter of fact, every school of literature has their own rules, more or less. These rules can also be seen as contraints (tricks), only because they had already been accepted by public, in general.<br /> | |||
For instance, in traditional Chinese literature, there was a school called Jueju(绝句, broken off lines) which was popular in Tang Dynasty (from the period from 618 to 907). " Jueju poems are always quatrains; or, more specifically, a matched pair of couplets, with each line consisting of five or seven syllables" with the same rhymes. It requires author to fully use every character to create a successful poem. <br /> | |||
Thus, setting up rules is not a rare issue in literature field. <br /> | |||
In every literature genre, the reason why we setup rules and contraints, is not only because we want to play with words or letters, but also we can find out some potential things which we have missed when writing "regular" text, as a result, from which, the literature's conventions spilt out. <br /> | |||
===From Contraints to Freedom=== | |||
"Art lives from constraints and dies from freedom."Leonardo da Vinci. | |||
As the "alchemy" of language, Oulipo cooks the words with 100% sobriety and objectivity. In another words, the inspiration of writing is also been controlled. Their inspiration and creativity from the totally-controlled literature contraints they set by themselves.<br /> | |||
====Mathematics and Oulipo==== | |||
Mathematics, as the footstone of science, plays a very important role in Oulipo rules' setup. "Shape" and "number", as two basic elements in Maths world, makes everything in our daily life can be calculated or counted, instead of based on the vague sense, also known as the original ability of abstract thinking of humanbeing. The more the abstract is, the more a science can apply on other sciences. Thus, it is inevitable that Mathematics can be a useful tool for other subjects. As Karl Marx noted that "A science can be truly developing when it can apply Mathematics successfully." <br /> | |||
"All art should become science, and all science art." If Friedrich Schlegel's point of view is right, let's put literature as a huge kind of science, then, Oulipo can be a branch of the science". Oulipo, apparently, is developing by the extensive appliance of Maths. In contrast to the other schools of literature whose writing methods are mainly based on sense and feeling of authors, Oulipo brings us a mathematicly abstract and logic reading experience. Rules, | |||
As a matter of fact, Oulipo is consisted of not only professional lovers but also scientists and mathematicians. Raymond Queneau, known as one of the founders of Oulipo, also has the background of mathematics. He researched and came forward a new notion "Queneau Sequence". Besides, In his works ''Odile'' and "Les Enfants du limon", he also explained some maths questions and solved maths problems. That is the reason why Oulipo has abundant content and very strong logicality, which is closely related with the attribute of Mathematics. Building up rules with strong sense of logic can be compared to making a "cup", which signify that Oulipian can fill the cup with anything they want. | |||
Contraint is absolute, and freedom is relative. | |||
====Infinite Blink==== | |||
Recently, I put my all attention on making light installation "Infinite Blink", which is combined with LED and 3d/2d projection. LED, as the container of a projection. The blink container can be the contraint of projection, or even if, can be seen as the stage of water. It gives the projection a platform to spin or move along, at the same time, the container also limit the moving scale of the projection. Machines, which in my point of view, are one of the most controlled stuff in the world, which must be calculated logically by their creators. However, the functions and the appearances can be created in many ways. It is machines who set up rules, using rules and giving them lives is what the humans do. | |||
===Conclusion=== | |||
There are two standards to critic Oulipo works: Firstly, settings of rules (technical perspective), the other is the works themselves (literature perspective). A successful Oulipo work should successfully reaches these two critical points. No matter how complicated or difficult the contraints and rules are in Oulipo grammar, after all, Oulipo is still in the circle of literature, which means readers are able to and should enjoy reading it like reading the other "normal" works. | |||
</div> |
Latest revision as of 13:08, 2 March 2016
Stone. Grade: 6.5 Steve's comments: You are getting to grips with your subject. But I have to mark you down because in places your notation is not too clear (who are you referencing, what text, what page?) and there is no bibliography in the above version. In future you could also make a clearer relation to your self-directed research. These are the grades:
DISTINCTION 10 (A+) MERIT 9 (A) VERY GOOD PASS 8 (A-) GOOD PASS 7 (B+) PASS 6 (B) NEAR PASS 5 (C) FAIL 4 (D)
Broken Essay for Six Selections By The Oulipo: Getting Freedom from Contraints
Introduction
The text "Six Selections by the Oulipo" is a combination of 6 texts about Oulipo, which are:
One Hudred Thousand Billion Poems, Yours for the Telling by Raymond Queneau, A Brief History of the Oulipo by Jean Lescure, For a Potenteial Analysis of Combinatory
Literature by Claude Berge, Computer and Writer: The Centre Pompidou
Experiment by Paul Fournel and Prose and Anticombinatorics by Italo Calvino. Those articles give us a brief introduction and a glimpse of what is Oulipo and how Oulipo writers work.
50 years ago, a group of French literatures lover established Oulipo (workshop of potential literature). Raymond Queneau (one of the original founders besides Francois Le Lionnais) noted that Oulipo is not a school of literature,a literature seminer or experiments, but a natural, artificial and amusing workshop where people are able to make up their own writing rules and restricts, in order to spark inspirations and find the vieling possibilities of literature.
For instance: "Airplane" ( Abbreviation of words.The word "Jet" is the abbreviation abbreviation ), "Beau(belle) Present(e)" ( a poem which compound names of a person you cherished or hated ) or "s+n" ( replace each noun of an existing text by the "N"th noun after it found in a dictionary) etc.. .
In this essay, I will give my analysis of Oulipo from the perspective of the relationship between contraint and freedom of literature.
Contraints
The core of Oulipo rules is based on settivng writing rules, which can be considered as "an add operation which is based on subtraction". That is why Oulipo is distinctly different from current schools of literature: hyper-ration, behind-closed-doors chasing for language skills and new forms. "The Oulipo escapes the Romantic cul-de-sac of unfettered imagination (or its Surrealist avatar, chance) by reintroducing external constraints, which are self-imposed."quoted from Oulipo: Freeing literature by tightening its rules.
In another words, the artificial contraints are a symbol of Oulipo, with which writers can write in gameplay.
Language is a complicated container or system combining with different functional parts. However, from Oulipo writers' point of view, it can also be an objected self-supported subject. Putting contraints into language makes the linguistic functions under-controlled.
For example, Lipogram, which is known as one of Oulipo writing methods, sets up the rule as writing excluding one or more letters. In Dissappear , Georges Perec did not use the letter "e" which is the most common letter in French. In a report, Marcel Bénabou noted that during the period of writing this novel, Georges Perec listed all the words that he could use without 0"e", the list was endless.
Another typical work is One Hundred Thousand Billion Poems by Raymond Queneau. It "is a set of ten sonnets, printed on card with each line on a separated strip, like a heads-bodies-and-legs book, a type of children's book with which Queneau was familiar. As all ten sonnets have not just the same rhyme scheme but the same rhyme sounds, any lines from a sonnet can be combined with any from the nine others, so that there are 100,000,000,000,000 different poems". This work can be treated as a computer programme, which can be randomly or artificially made by audience. However, The work is readable and followed by sonnet rules strictly.
However, the mainstream would never accept "linguistic games". Marcus Valerius Martialis once said that indulging in tricks is shameful and stupid. As a matter of fact, every school of literature has their own rules, more or less. These rules can also be seen as contraints (tricks), only because they had already been accepted by public, in general.
For instance, in traditional Chinese literature, there was a school called Jueju(绝句, broken off lines) which was popular in Tang Dynasty (from the period from 618 to 907). " Jueju poems are always quatrains; or, more specifically, a matched pair of couplets, with each line consisting of five or seven syllables" with the same rhymes. It requires author to fully use every character to create a successful poem.
Thus, setting up rules is not a rare issue in literature field.
In every literature genre, the reason why we setup rules and contraints, is not only because we want to play with words or letters, but also we can find out some potential things which we have missed when writing "regular" text, as a result, from which, the literature's conventions spilt out.
From Contraints to Freedom
"Art lives from constraints and dies from freedom."Leonardo da Vinci.
As the "alchemy" of language, Oulipo cooks the words with 100% sobriety and objectivity. In another words, the inspiration of writing is also been controlled. Their inspiration and creativity from the totally-controlled literature contraints they set by themselves.
Mathematics and Oulipo
Mathematics, as the footstone of science, plays a very important role in Oulipo rules' setup. "Shape" and "number", as two basic elements in Maths world, makes everything in our daily life can be calculated or counted, instead of based on the vague sense, also known as the original ability of abstract thinking of humanbeing. The more the abstract is, the more a science can apply on other sciences. Thus, it is inevitable that Mathematics can be a useful tool for other subjects. As Karl Marx noted that "A science can be truly developing when it can apply Mathematics successfully."
"All art should become science, and all science art." If Friedrich Schlegel's point of view is right, let's put literature as a huge kind of science, then, Oulipo can be a branch of the science". Oulipo, apparently, is developing by the extensive appliance of Maths. In contrast to the other schools of literature whose writing methods are mainly based on sense and feeling of authors, Oulipo brings us a mathematicly abstract and logic reading experience. Rules,
As a matter of fact, Oulipo is consisted of not only professional lovers but also scientists and mathematicians. Raymond Queneau, known as one of the founders of Oulipo, also has the background of mathematics. He researched and came forward a new notion "Queneau Sequence". Besides, In his works Odile and "Les Enfants du limon", he also explained some maths questions and solved maths problems. That is the reason why Oulipo has abundant content and very strong logicality, which is closely related with the attribute of Mathematics. Building up rules with strong sense of logic can be compared to making a "cup", which signify that Oulipian can fill the cup with anything they want.
Contraint is absolute, and freedom is relative.
Infinite Blink
Recently, I put my all attention on making light installation "Infinite Blink", which is combined with LED and 3d/2d projection. LED, as the container of a projection. The blink container can be the contraint of projection, or even if, can be seen as the stage of water. It gives the projection a platform to spin or move along, at the same time, the container also limit the moving scale of the projection. Machines, which in my point of view, are one of the most controlled stuff in the world, which must be calculated logically by their creators. However, the functions and the appearances can be created in many ways. It is machines who set up rules, using rules and giving them lives is what the humans do.
Conclusion
There are two standards to critic Oulipo works: Firstly, settings of rules (technical perspective), the other is the works themselves (literature perspective). A successful Oulipo work should successfully reaches these two critical points. No matter how complicated or difficult the contraints and rules are in Oulipo grammar, after all, Oulipo is still in the circle of literature, which means readers are able to and should enjoy reading it like reading the other "normal" works.
Reference
[Steve: how to extend this: a) make relation to own work b) look at conceptualist art works from early 60s on. c) How have these principles been extended into digital forms?]
Oulipo wiki
Orwell Ver. : Broken Essay for Six Selections By The Oulipo: Getting Freedom from Contraints (in progress)
Introduction
The text "Six Selections by the Oulipo" is a combination of 6 texts about Oulipo. Those texts are One Hudred Thousand Billion Poems, Yours for the Telling by Raymond Queneau, A Brief History of the Oulipo by Jean Lescure, For a Potenteial Analysis of Combinatory
Literature by Claude Berge, Computer and Writer: The Centre Pompidou
Experiment by Paul Fournel and Prose and Anticombinatorics by Italo Calvino. Those articles give us a brief introduction and a glimpse of what is Oulipo and how Oulipo writers work.
50 years ago, a group of French literature lovers established Oulipo. Oulipo means workshop of potential literature. Raymond Queneau who is one of the original founders noted that Oulipo is not a school of literature,a literature seminer or experiments, but a natural, artificial and amusing workshop where people make up their own writing rules and restricts, in order to spark inspirations and find the literature possibilities.
For instance: "Airplane" ( Abbreviation of words.The word "Jet" is the abbreviation ), "Beau(belle) Present(e)" ( a poem which compound names of a person you cherished or hated ) or "s+n" ( replace each noun of an existing text by the "n"th noun after it found in a dictionary) etc. .
In this essay, I will give my analysis of Oulipo from the perspective of the relationship between contraint and freedom of literature.
Contraints
The core of Oulipo rules is based on setting writing rules. That is why Oulipo is distinctly different from current schools of literature, which chases for language skills and new forms. "The Oulipo escapes the Romantic cul-de-sac of unfettered imagination (or its Surrealist avatar, chance) by reintroducing external constraints, which are self-imposed."quoted from Oulipo: Freeing literature by tightening its rules.
In another words, the artificial contraints are a symbol of Oulipo, with which writers can write in gameplay.
Language is a complicated container or system combining with different functional parts. However, from Oulipo writers' point of view, it can also be an objected self-supported subject. Putting contraints into language makes the linguistic functions under-controlled.
For example, Lipogram, which is known as one of Oulipo writing methods, sets up the rule as writing excluding one or more letters. In Dissappear , Georges Perec did not use the letter "e" which is the most common letter in French. In a report, Marcel Bénabou noted that during the period of writing this novel, Georges Perec listed all the words that he could use without 0"e", the list was endless.
Another typical work is One Hundred Thousand Billion Poems by Raymond Queneau. It "is a set of ten sonnets, printed on card with each line on a separated strip, like a heads-bodies-and-legs book, a type of children's book with which Queneau was familiar. As all ten sonnets have not just the same rhyme scheme but the same rhyme sounds, any lines from a sonnet can be combined with any from the nine others, so that there are 100,000,000,000,000 different poems". This work can be treated as a computer programme, which can be randomly or artificially made by audience. However, The work is readable and followed by sonnet rules strictly.
However, the mainstream would never accept "linguistic games". Marcus Valerius Martialis once said that indulging in tricks is shameful and stupid. As a matter of fact, every school of literature has their own rules, more or less. These rules can also be seen as contraints (tricks), only because they had already been accepted by public, in general.
For instance, in traditional Chinese literature, there was a school called Jueju(绝句, broken off lines) which was popular in Tang Dynasty (from the period from 618 to 907). " Jueju poems are always quatrains; or, more specifically, a matched pair of couplets, with each line consisting of five or seven syllables" with the same rhymes. It requires author to fully use every character to create a successful poem.
Thus, setting up rules is not a rare issue in literature field.
In every literature genre, the reason why we setup rules and contraints, is not only because we want to play with words or letters, but also we can find out some potential things which we have missed when writing "regular" text, as a result, from which, the literature's conventions spilt out.
From Contraints to Freedom
"Art lives from constraints and dies from freedom."Leonardo da Vinci.
As the "alchemy" of language, Oulipo cooks the words with 100% sobriety and objectivity. In another words, the inspiration of writing is also been controlled. Their inspiration and creativity from the totally-controlled literature contraints they set by themselves.
Mathematics and Oulipo
Mathematics, as the footstone of science, plays a very important role in Oulipo rules' setup. "Shape" and "number", as two basic elements in Maths world, makes everything in our daily life can be calculated or counted, instead of based on the vague sense, also known as the original ability of abstract thinking of humanbeing. The more the abstract is, the more a science can apply on other sciences. Thus, it is inevitable that Mathematics can be a useful tool for other subjects. As Karl Marx noted that "A science can be truly developing when it can apply Mathematics successfully."
"All art should become science, and all science art." If Friedrich Schlegel's point of view is right, let's put literature as a huge kind of science, then, Oulipo can be a branch of the science". Oulipo, apparently, is developing by the extensive appliance of Maths. In contrast to the other schools of literature whose writing methods are mainly based on sense and feeling of authors, Oulipo brings us a mathematicly abstract and logic reading experience. Rules,
As a matter of fact, Oulipo is consisted of not only professional lovers but also scientists and mathematicians. Raymond Queneau, known as one of the founders of Oulipo, also has the background of mathematics. He researched and came forward a new notion "Queneau Sequence". Besides, In his works Odile and "Les Enfants du limon", he also explained some maths questions and solved maths problems. That is the reason why Oulipo has abundant content and very strong logicality, which is closely related with the attribute of Mathematics. Building up rules with strong sense of logic can be compared to making a "cup", which signify that Oulipian can fill the cup with anything they want.
Contraint is absolute, and freedom is relative.
Infinite Blink
Recently, I put my all attention on making light installation "Infinite Blink", which is combined with LED and 3d/2d projection. LED, as the container of a projection. The blink container can be the contraint of projection, or even if, can be seen as the stage of water. It gives the projection a platform to spin or move along, at the same time, the container also limit the moving scale of the projection. Machines, which in my point of view, are one of the most controlled stuff in the world, which must be calculated logically by their creators. However, the functions and the appearances can be created in many ways. It is machines who set up rules, using rules and giving them lives is what the humans do.
Conclusion
There are two standards to critic Oulipo works: Firstly, settings of rules (technical perspective), the other is the works themselves (literature perspective). A successful Oulipo work should successfully reaches these two critical points. No matter how complicated or difficult the contraints and rules are in Oulipo grammar, after all, Oulipo is still in the circle of literature, which means readers are able to and should enjoy reading it like reading the other "normal" works.