EYE On Art: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==== Lucas (let me expand a bit, as I cannot be present on Monday 28th)==== | ==== Lucas (let me expand a bit, as I cannot be present on Monday 28th)==== | ||
As we will be dealing with a (historical) archive in some ways, I think it may be useful to tap into some of the history of experimental | As we will be dealing with a (historical) archive in some ways, I think it may be useful to tap into some of the history of experimental cinema, especially on expanded cinema. | ||
Expanded cinema refers to a wide practice of moving-image art/films from the 1960s onwards. Mainly refers to cinematic and film-based works that go beyond the two-dimensional single screen convention. | Expanded cinema refers to a wide practice of moving-image art/films from the 1960s onwards. Mainly refers to cinematic and film-based works that go beyond the two-dimensional single screen convention. | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Expanded cinema was a lively category especially from the 1970s – think Nam June Paik, Malcom le Grice, Jonas Mekas, Tony Conrad, Pieter Weibel, etc. | Expanded cinema was a lively category especially from the 1970s – think Nam June Paik, Malcom le Grice, Jonas Mekas, Tony Conrad, Pieter Weibel, etc. | ||
Perhaps the EYE archive has material on this to | Perhaps the EYE archive has material on this to play with. | ||
I propose to use this as a starting point, or as a historical precursor to current practices (ours included!) that go beyond traditional cinema and act in the intersection of digital, network culture, film and art… | I propose to use this as a starting point, or as a historical precursor to current practices (ours included!) that go beyond traditional cinema and act in the intersection of digital, network culture, film and art… | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 27 September 2015
This page is for collecting information and thoughts on the EYE On Art 2016 programme.
Team
Please add your name to the list if you're not there yet!
- Julie
- Christina
- Cihad
- Ally
- Solange
- Ruben
- Sarah
- Joana
- Lucas
- Thomas
- Arantxa
- Samira
- Julia
- Natalya
- Benjamin (?)
- Yuzhen
Stage 1: Themes/Questions/Topics/...
The idea is to first come to a collective theme/question/topic/description/... to form an umbrella for our works.
Please prepare for our next meeting by putting your ideas in the following list:
- Questions: What practices lie in the boundaries between cinema, art and digital technologies? What can be said about their interaction today? (lucas)
- ...
Lucas (let me expand a bit, as I cannot be present on Monday 28th)
As we will be dealing with a (historical) archive in some ways, I think it may be useful to tap into some of the history of experimental cinema, especially on expanded cinema.
Expanded cinema refers to a wide practice of moving-image art/films from the 1960s onwards. Mainly refers to cinematic and film-based works that go beyond the two-dimensional single screen convention.
Expanded cinema was a lively category especially from the 1970s – think Nam June Paik, Malcom le Grice, Jonas Mekas, Tony Conrad, Pieter Weibel, etc.
Perhaps the EYE archive has material on this to play with.
I propose to use this as a starting point, or as a historical precursor to current practices (ours included!) that go beyond traditional cinema and act in the intersection of digital, network culture, film and art…
Basically I would propose to look into cinematic works that involves more than a single 2-d projection on a screen, and that takes into account how technology has influenced us culturally.
Could take the form of / include thing from the archive like:
- multiple projections,
- mixed media,
- live action/ cinematic works with performance,
- intermedia,
- internet based films,
- audience participation.