Text on method second draft: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Text on my method''' | '''Text on my method''' | ||
During my BA I was working on my identity, my environment and me. Because I believed, in order to work on other subjects you need to know yourself better. To know myself better, I started to work on my identity based on my origin. Last year of my study shift from environment and my identity to space and identity of object, take place in my practice. And it continues during my Master study at Piet Zwart Institute. I stated to read and think about space and object in social context. Because space is surrounds us. It is everywhere. Space consists of natural space, social space, representations or theories of space, according to Lefebvre (Lefebvre, 1991). And object, | During my BA I was working on my identity, my environment and me. Because I believed, in order to work on other subjects you need to know yourself better. To know myself better, I started to work on my identity based on my origin. Last year of my study shift from environment and my identity to space and identity of object, take place in my practice. And it continues during my Master study at Piet Zwart Institute. I stated to read and think about space and object in social context. Because space is surrounds us. It is everywhere. Space consists of natural space, social space, representations or theories of space, according to Lefebvre (Lefebvre, 1991). And object, “''In order to develop social theory in this century we need to consider objects (non-human) on the same level as human''” (Latour, 1994). Beside Bruno Latour I used my cultural background. In eastern mystical philosophy, we believe every object has a soul. We need consider this idea that while we are using objects. | ||
Revision as of 14:05, 3 June 2015
Text on my method
During my BA I was working on my identity, my environment and me. Because I believed, in order to work on other subjects you need to know yourself better. To know myself better, I started to work on my identity based on my origin. Last year of my study shift from environment and my identity to space and identity of object, take place in my practice. And it continues during my Master study at Piet Zwart Institute. I stated to read and think about space and object in social context. Because space is surrounds us. It is everywhere. Space consists of natural space, social space, representations or theories of space, according to Lefebvre (Lefebvre, 1991). And object, “In order to develop social theory in this century we need to consider objects (non-human) on the same level as human” (Latour, 1994). Beside Bruno Latour I used my cultural background. In eastern mystical philosophy, we believe every object has a soul. We need consider this idea that while we are using objects.
In order to start from one of my early topics. I need to talk about Root project. Environment is one of the parameter that shapes our life. I started to travel to my village to know people and environment. I believe we shape environment and at the same time environment shapes us. I collected minerals and stones and used photography and video at the beginning Root project to document relationship between my roots and me. The relationship that I want to build up was not working at the beginning. Photographs and videos were not enough to tell my experiences, stories. Then I decided to build up a space for beholder to experience my relation with my roots. The idea of building up a space or production of space is coming from Lefebvre’s book “The Production of the spaces”. By using concept of “representations of space”, I created a dark room with full of soil and a photograph in a lightbox. Installation turned into representation of my village where audiences can experience, disconnected relation to my root. In the installation the earth is colder than the ambient temperature and the light box gave off ‘heat’.
The other part of my root project is reproduction of my origin. At the end of this project I realized that my village is not my root anymore. My father and me were born in Istanbul not in this village. As a result of this project this village is just a beginning of my origin. The stones and minerals that I collected from my village, I took them as a starting point like my grandfather and started to reproduce them in different ways such as Resin, 3d mapping and reflection. Reproduced stones looks like each other same as me and my grandfather. As an appearance reproduced stones are same but they are totally different from each other internally. And on the other hand during this project working with stones helped me to have a starting point to understand language of non-human to build up non hierarchical relationship in this anthropocentric contemporary world.
If you live in a city you forget the relationship with nature environment. Cities are consuming nature to make new spaces for new buildings. We have less communication with nature in this century. We forgot how we could live together. In this video work I wanted to investigate the relationship between nature and human in cities in order to deny that there are existential divisions between human and non-human nature. There is a tree in my garden and it has direct impact to my life as physical, psychological. I started to records its movements as a diary. I project this video vertical in order to point my window and there is a mirror on this video and reflect part of video to opposite site which is symbolize me.
In between, shift from my identity and environment to production of space and non-human subjects. This work is about identity of Turkish people and our environment, which is made by state. Fictionalized Illusion is based on protest in Istanbul. I was collecting a lot of archive photographs, family albums from flea markets in Istanbul. I used this archive photographs in order to work on Turkish political history. In Turkey’s ninety years history, there are four military coups. Every time these coups made for intervention to different people. Because, there is no room for differentness, among people who lives in Turkey. I made collages and divided them into three section in this work. It starts with colorful photographs shows how they are different from each other, it ends with a photograph of a commander’s face. Second section shows after military coup and people has blank inner. State removes their identity. Third parts consist of grey people. State imposed itself with a grey to its people. This grey color is coming from colorful stairs in Istanbul. After Gezi park protests, people painted stairs in to color then municipality painted these stairs in to grey. And I took same grey as they used in order to show color of state. I am going to exhibit this work in a room with small entrance. In Turkish culture, we used to have small entrances. You needed to crouch down to get inside in order to show your respect to people who are inside. I am going to use same entrance. The wall of installation will be grey. Because, this room is going to turn into representation of Turkish state.
Circle is 4 channel, 49 minutes sound installation. It is last result of my research on Production of the Space idea from Lefebvre and Bachelard. It makes a circle around you in order to effect you in the dark room. It opens you a spot where you can have direct relationship with an artwork. It affects your sense of hearing and seeing. The produced space starts to suggest you new emotions. The sound that I produced refer to “designed space”, experienced sound refer to “lived space” and suggested emotions refer to “space that we make sense ” using the triad of Lefebvre. The dialect relationship between these three spaces makes a product of space which space can be producible both up and down like a circle.
Production of space and non-human concepts became my main topic for a period. Counting is one of the results of this research. Using quote from Bruno Latour during my performance I count every objects and human together on the same level in the space that I am in. In order to give to non-human a space. If we want to give an equal level for non-human we need to call them with their names not just as an object. I am trying to understand relationship between human and non-human with this performance. I am asking a question, are we observers or ingredients of this society or both?
Thinking about human non-human relationship and production of space are my main research recently. The world that we live in is consist of space and objects. We believe an anthropocentric world. But is not true, where share it with space and non-human. Human being started to affect his environment, space and non-human. But we forget an essential thing; we can’t live without spaces and non-human. Through these subjects I want to tell my words in social context as an interpreter, of these issues in social context.
References
Books
Bachelard , Gaston, (1958), Poetic of space
Bourriaud, Nicolas,(2002),Relational Art
Florenksi, Pavel, Reverse Perspective, Pavel
Grayson, John, (1975), Sound Sculpture
Henry, David, ( 1995 ),Noise: a Human History of Sound and Listening, David Henry
Lane & Caryle, Angus,(2013) On Listening
Lefebvre, Henri, (1991),Production of the space
Ranciere,Jacques (2008), Le Spectateur Emancipe,
Sayin, Zeynep, (2006), Pornography of image
Sterne, Jonathan, (2012), Sound Studies
Tufeyl, Ibn, (1122), Hay Ibn Yakzan
Articles,
Benjamin, Walter, The Work of art in the Age of reproduction
Garcia, Tristam,No Matter What
Latour, Bruno, What are the missing Masses
URL's,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecocentrism