User:Manetta/readinglist: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="width:700px;"> | <div style="width:700px;"> | ||
=reading list= | |||
==Yuk Hui - Metadata (2014) → http://cdckeywords.leuphana.com/metadata/== | ==Yuk Hui - Metadata (2014) → http://cdckeywords.leuphana.com/metadata/== | ||
Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
[1] | [1] essay about the CYC project, CYC: Building HAL → http://www.cs.unm.edu/~storm/docs/Cyc.htm | ||
: - description from the essay: "CYC is a very large, multi-contextual knowledge base and inference engine developed by Cycorp. The goal of the CYC project is to break the ‘ software brittleness bottleneck' once and for all . . . (1)" | |||
: - from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyc#Overview wikipedia]: "Like many companies, Cycorp has ambitions to use the Cyc natural language understanding tools to parse the entire internet to extract structured data." | |||
annotations: | |||
: - "The software brittleness bottleneck is a problem that has long occupied computer scientists, and stems from the fact that often times, if input is not within the input that the program is meant to handle, deviates from its expected input, it cannot handle the input."<br> | |||
: - "He argues that arrogance, and the drive to survive at all costs are human features, which do not translate into computers, not because they cannot be programmed to be arrogant, but instead because that is simply not the most '''efficient''' way to perform a task. He further argues that emotions would not even be part of such a program, because those too are inefficiencies in the human machine." | |||
: - but due to commercializing, the history of the project is not documented that well, and there are unanswered questions if the project has been used in certain applications | |||
== interview with Bruce Sterling - on the convergence of humans and machines → [http://www.nextnature.net/2015/02/interview-bruce-sterling-on-the-convergence-of-humans-and-machines/ at nextnature.net] == | |||
: - I think that '''artificial intelligence is a bad metaphor'''. It is not the right way to talk about what is happening. So, I like to use the terms “'''cognition'''” and “'''computation'''”. Cognition is something that happens in brains, physical, biological brains. Computation is a thing that happens with software strings on electronic tracks that are inscribed out of silicon and put on fibre board. | |||
: - The idea comes from '''metaphysical problems''': Is mathematics thinking? If a machine can play chess, is it thinking? There are a lot of things that machines can do, that algorithms can do, that software can do. They have very little to do with cognition. | |||
: - Cognition does not equal computation. You do not even want cognition to equal computation. You are getting '''in the way''' of making computation do things that are of genuine interest. | |||
: - [example] They are just taken in by Alan Turing’s mystification. If you are a human being, and you are doing computation, you are trying to multiply 17 times five in your head. It feels like thinking. Machines can multiply, too. They must be thinking. They can do math and you can do math. | |||
==Boris Groys - What is German media philosophy? → http://ghiraldelli.pro.br/wp-content/uploads/Groys.pdf== | ==Boris Groys - What is German media philosophy? → http://ghiraldelli.pro.br/wp-content/uploads/Groys.pdf== | ||
==Joseph Weizenbaum - Computer Power and Human Reason (1976)== | |||
Eliza creator<br /> | |||
and the response of ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Murray Jannet Murray], a woman of MIT) that sees it as fiction, and that people do not need to take it so seriously<br /> | |||
michael: "shouldn't we consider the iPad also as fiction: its frictionless magic glass?" | |||
==Alessandro Ludovico - Post-digital Publishing, Hybrid and Processual Objects in Print → http://www.aprja.net/?p=1738 == | |||
==Florian Cramer - What is post-digital? → http://post-digital.projects.cavi.dk/?p=599== | |||
==Angie Keefer - AN OCTOPUS IN PLAN VIEW → http://servinglibrary.org/read.html?id=7== | |||
==SO-IL, nominated for Prix du Rome 2014, Form follows Fiction → http://so-il.org/app/uploads/2014/10/Form-Follows-Fiction.pdf== | |||
==Alphabetization (part I) - Luis Camnitzer (on e-flux) → http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_888878.pdf == | |||
==Alphabetization (part II) - Luis Camnitzer (on e-flux) → http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_888891.pdf == | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<small>[[User:Manetta/annotations/first-annotation-pages-on-the-wiki | link to old annotation pages on this wiki]]</small> | |||
</div> | </div> |
Latest revision as of 22:16, 30 April 2015
reading list
Yuk Hui - Metadata (2014) → http://cdckeywords.leuphana.com/metadata/
Since the 70’s, computer scientists, especially those working in the domain of artificial intelligence, have attempted to construct automated knowledge systems and different technical schemes for the representation of knowledge. Among them, the most well known is the CYC project[1], which is premised on the belief that one can construct a representation system of common sense knowledges that users can search and learn from.
Nevertheless, industries still used metadata schemes during this period in order to enhance the interoperability of machines, but with a more humble name: mark-up languages. We can see very clearly a technical lineage of industrial standardisation with these mark-up languages, for example, from SGML, to HTML, to XML and XHTML, to Web Ontologies (Hui 2012).
[1] essay about the CYC project, CYC: Building HAL → http://www.cs.unm.edu/~storm/docs/Cyc.htm
- - description from the essay: "CYC is a very large, multi-contextual knowledge base and inference engine developed by Cycorp. The goal of the CYC project is to break the ‘ software brittleness bottleneck' once and for all . . . (1)"
- - from wikipedia: "Like many companies, Cycorp has ambitions to use the Cyc natural language understanding tools to parse the entire internet to extract structured data."
annotations:
- - "The software brittleness bottleneck is a problem that has long occupied computer scientists, and stems from the fact that often times, if input is not within the input that the program is meant to handle, deviates from its expected input, it cannot handle the input."
- - "He argues that arrogance, and the drive to survive at all costs are human features, which do not translate into computers, not because they cannot be programmed to be arrogant, but instead because that is simply not the most efficient way to perform a task. He further argues that emotions would not even be part of such a program, because those too are inefficiencies in the human machine."
- - but due to commercializing, the history of the project is not documented that well, and there are unanswered questions if the project has been used in certain applications
interview with Bruce Sterling - on the convergence of humans and machines → at nextnature.net
- - I think that artificial intelligence is a bad metaphor. It is not the right way to talk about what is happening. So, I like to use the terms “cognition” and “computation”. Cognition is something that happens in brains, physical, biological brains. Computation is a thing that happens with software strings on electronic tracks that are inscribed out of silicon and put on fibre board.
- - The idea comes from metaphysical problems: Is mathematics thinking? If a machine can play chess, is it thinking? There are a lot of things that machines can do, that algorithms can do, that software can do. They have very little to do with cognition.
- - Cognition does not equal computation. You do not even want cognition to equal computation. You are getting in the way of making computation do things that are of genuine interest.
- - [example] They are just taken in by Alan Turing’s mystification. If you are a human being, and you are doing computation, you are trying to multiply 17 times five in your head. It feels like thinking. Machines can multiply, too. They must be thinking. They can do math and you can do math.
Boris Groys - What is German media philosophy? → http://ghiraldelli.pro.br/wp-content/uploads/Groys.pdf
Joseph Weizenbaum - Computer Power and Human Reason (1976)
Eliza creator
and the response of (Jannet Murray, a woman of MIT) that sees it as fiction, and that people do not need to take it so seriously
michael: "shouldn't we consider the iPad also as fiction: its frictionless magic glass?"
Alessandro Ludovico - Post-digital Publishing, Hybrid and Processual Objects in Print → http://www.aprja.net/?p=1738
Florian Cramer - What is post-digital? → http://post-digital.projects.cavi.dk/?p=599
Angie Keefer - AN OCTOPUS IN PLAN VIEW → http://servinglibrary.org/read.html?id=7
SO-IL, nominated for Prix du Rome 2014, Form follows Fiction → http://so-il.org/app/uploads/2014/10/Form-Follows-Fiction.pdf
Alphabetization (part I) - Luis Camnitzer (on e-flux) → http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_888878.pdf
Alphabetization (part II) - Luis Camnitzer (on e-flux) → http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_888891.pdf